Rightwing wrote: » I'm afraid he didn't just make that up:http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/all-households-must-pay-broadcasting-charge-237169.html Every liable household, without exception, will have to pay the new public service broadcasting charge. The charge will replace the television licence towards the end of next year.Nobody, it has been emphasised, will be able to argue against paying the charge on the grounds they do not have a television, computer, or any other device that can receive public service broadcasting. Communications Minister Pat Rabbitte wants to see the charge introduced by late 2014.
gladrags wrote: » Joe Costello interviewed on the 9pm news,said that the government needs to act quickly on Irish Water.He said that a referendum should considered, in order to ascertain,what the people want. He also said that the referendum,should also consider privatisation.
Red Pepper wrote: » I agree but you should have seen the protest in Galway, there was a very strong Sinn Fein element.
Creative Juices wrote: » Yeah I sensed that too. One man had a huge Irish flag right in front of the stage with the slogan Tiochfaidh Ár Lá written across it. The white portion of the flag had 2 rifles crossed with flags at the end - a tricolour and the papal flag. Ridiculous really.
listermint wrote: » Yes let one tool paint the whole movement. This is not sinn fein organised or sinn fein sponsored. Is there now a big FG push to paint all participants as members of the IRA? Jesus I didn't know they had 150000 members that's news to me
Iwasfrozen wrote: » The movement needs to self regulate or scumbags like him will give them a bad name. Why was he allowed to march with that flag? Why didn't other protesters take it off him? Are we to construe that their lack of action signified acceptance of him beliefs?
Highflyer13 wrote: » This government could well collapse in the new year. The next week will be very interesting. A lot of dissenting mutterings about Leinster House.
suicide_circus wrote: » Free country I guess, unlike the water
Iwasfrozen wrote: » The movement needs to self regulate or scumbags like him will give them a bad name. Why was he allowed to march with that flag? Why didn't other protesters take it off him? Are we to construe that their lack of action signified agreement with his beliefs?
Creative Juices wrote: » He was a big fella surrounded by a group of his buddies. I don't know if anyone asked him to take it down but he was certainly waving it about with vigour. I am not saying that the protests are Sinn Fein inspired or organised but they are certainly making hay from it which is to be expected but that particular flag was just dumb.
donvito99 wrote: » But SF still has the unrealistic fetish with the 32 counties
Iwasfrozen wrote: » Well I'm sorry but if dirt like that are allowed to march they will color people's perception of the movement. Whether fairly or unfairly.
gladrags wrote: » I was speaking to a group of Gardai in the city centre by chance yesterday,as the protesters were congregating,in Dublin. They told me that there was no trouble whatsover,not one incident. Another Garda said that it was the same at the last march in October. So lets not get carried away,their was no violence,and no unrest. One or two people waving flags does not harm anyone. Cheers
Banjo String wrote: » Are who available, the IRA army council that have disbanded Are you even remotely familiar with the peace process?
realdanbreen wrote: » Why is it still referred to as a peace 'process'. Is it a sort of implied threat(as Mcguinness implied when adams was arrested) that 'they haven't gone away you know'.
Deleted User wrote: » FFS:mad: stop hijacking this thread - stay on topic - this is meant to be about Irish Water and water charges.
listermint wrote: » The lads are taking queues out of endas big book of deflection. If you've got nothing to say about the matter at hand choose something ridiculous like one big bollix out of 150000 people waving a tiocfaidh ar la flag.
Creative Juices wrote: » Oh I am so sorry if my experience and perception upset your sensibilities. I shouldn't have even mentioned the example I provided for the SF influence that only I perceived. Apologies again. I'll try to be better.
Banjo String wrote: » No, I answered a question is all. efb is your man you're after tbh.
efb wrote: » The polls had to hem winning Dub SW, but those Water Charges tripped them up!!!!
Larbre34 wrote: » You do not put stuff in the constitution about bloody utilities. There is enough superfluous stuff in there as it is about society that has nothing to do with structuring a republic. Joe Costello or anyone else who suggests a referendum is a cretin.
twowheelsgood wrote: » Any protest that would make a TD resign absolutely would be a success. A councillor? I think the "right to water" gang have their sights set a bit higher than that. :pac: