cajonlardo wrote: » How are traders losing money? tens of thousands don't go into the city with lunch boxes and fizzy drinks. No way people come from around the country and don't buy a few bits.
gladrags wrote: » That's exactly what you are doing,or trying to do. Hijack this thread and lie,for self serving and irrelevant interests.
Highflyer13 wrote: » What is the next step now?
Deleted User wrote: » Dublin traders would love that! They're already losing out from people avoiding the area due to planned protests. However, I agree that one big meeting would be more effective than having a lot of small ones.
BoJack Horseman wrote: » Which was? ( like drawing blood from a turnip this)
gladrags wrote: » Read the thread
kefir32 wrote: » Won't be satisfied until this idiotic organisation is quashed.
Irish Steve wrote: » Not sure where the figures for attendances are coming from, we went up to the Ashbourne parade, but didn't march as I'm not prepared to put my support behind the No charge camp, or the SF agenda, both of which were a fundamental part of the Ashbourne parade. When it left the assembly point, there's no way there were 2000 people there, I'd have put the numbers are between 200 and 300 at that point. May well have increased due to late arrivals, but it would have to have increased significantly to hit the sort of numbers they are claiming.
BoJack Horseman wrote: » As the only political parties who want it gone have less than zero chance of having a Dáil majority, your wish will remain unfulfilled.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » The numbers are coming from the Right2Water twitter account.
Highflyer13 wrote: » What is the next step now? Will there be more organized protests? They should have another big one in Dublin and bus in people from all over the country. Id say it would be bigger than the Oct 11th march,
hmmm wrote: » There is no next step. Everyone who is protesting wants something different.
kefir32 wrote: » Never say never
tayto lover wrote: » Monster protest in Dublin in Dec (think it's the 13th but not sure).
keith16 wrote: » Yes indeed. Something different than Irish Water. Something different than cronyism, quangos and ham fisted attempts at squeezing more money out of Irish people. Something different than political appointments, and utter incompetence. Something different than an inflated bonus cultures for said incompetence. You are very correct when you say everyone wants something different.
cajonlardo wrote: » I've said it before. If S.F had the numbers at these marches they could walk into Govt buildings in the morning.
donvito99 wrote: » That's nonsense. SF could walk into Gov buildings with a load of Armalites if they wanted to, but won't by the consent of a majority of the people.
kefir32 wrote: » We have a prophet predicting the future, thanks for that
BoJack Horseman wrote: » Let's pop back in May 2016 & see if Joe Higgins or Ben Gilroy are taoiseach. I'm gonna be bold & say no. You can think that will happen if you wish. Everyone needs to dream I guess.
cajonlardo wrote: » Not sure why you ae directing that at me? She is anti water charge. There was an organised peaceful and lawful protest. in a democratic country. I am baffled as to where the problem is?Tell you what. Why don't all you lot go ahead and organise a Pro Water Charge March. When you get tens of thousands marching we might take notice of something you say.
Stargate wrote: » Best post of the day by far !
Irish Steve wrote: » Not sure where the figures for attendances are coming from,.
VinLieger wrote: » Which is run by union's who never inflate figures to achieve their agenda's......
lanos wrote: » the opinion polls would suggest otherwiseBTW do you think Mary Lou McDonald has ever handled an Armalite what about Aengus Ó Snodaigh or Pearse Doherty or Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin or Peadar Tóibín this is the real face of Sinn Fein professional educated candidates without self-interest motivating them now don't bother mentioning ferris, adams or mcGuinnesss even these are dinosaurs and won't be relevant soon.
Beaner1 wrote: » I have a pro water charges facebook group that's doing well.
cajonlardo wrote: » Not sure why you ae directing that at me? She is anti water charge. There was an organised peaceful and lawful protest. in a democratic country. I am baffled as to where the problem is? Tell you what. Why don't all you lot go ahead and organise a Pro Water Charge March. When you get tens of thousands marching we might take notice of something you say.
lanos wrote: » this is the real face of Sinn Fein professional educated candidates without self-interest motivating them now don't bother mentioning ferris, adams or mcGuinnesss even these are dinosaurs and won't be relevant soon.
VinLieger wrote: » Nobody is pro water charges, of course I don't want to pay for water or anything else I just have enough cop on to understand that we have to otherwise in 10-20 years we will all be on boil water notices and living with third world standards of water infrastructure.