VinLieger wrote: » Hardly a smear against the people there, I was simply saying from what I have heard SF and other socialists have placed banners at the forefront of several protests in a cheap attempt to make themselves look like they are at the head of the protests. Also unless you can prove no SF or socialists were involved it's not a lie either, calm down a bit yeah?
donvito99 wrote: » Doing other protesters a level of disservice.
VinLieger wrote: » Which then get's completely hijacked by the socialist's and SF by all accounts
Fred Swanson wrote: » This post has been deleted.
Fred Swanson wrote: » So you are denying that SF were not part of the protests?
cajonlardo wrote: » I've said it before. If S.F had the numbers at these marches they could walk into Govt buildings in the morning.
cajonlardo wrote: » Seriously hope you aren't in the Legal business if you think that link proves anything other than S.F were present at marches I've said it before. If S.F had the numbers at these marches they could walk into Govt buildings in the morning.
donvito99 wrote: » That's nonsense. SF could walk into Gov buildings with a load of Armalites if they wanted to, but won't by the consent of a majority of the people.
The_Valeyard wrote: » Was at the GPO. MC was terrible. Lost all interest once the fluoride girl spoke. Seperate issue. Fair play to everyone turning out though.
VinLieger wrote: » Surely that has to be the biggest issue shown today they are getting hijacked by other special interests, fair play to everyone who turned out even if I don't agree with what the majority are protesting against which is simply not wanting to pay for water but I really hate to see any issue getting hijacked by self serving politician's or people trying to use this display for their own selfish purposes
gladrags wrote: » Hijack this thread and lie,for self serving and irrelevant interests.
gladrags wrote: » That's exactly what you are doing,or trying to do. Hijack this thread and lie,for self serving and irrelevant interests.
donvito99 wrote: » He's expressing his honest opinion about protests being used as a means to further political careers. Because someone has a different view as you does not mean the thread's hijacked.
hju6 wrote: » No he is deflecting
VinLieger wrote: » According to the Journal's Liveblog Mary Lou was at the one in Cabra
Highflyer13 wrote: » What is the next step now? Will there be more organized protests? They should have another big one in Dublin and bus in people from all over the country. Id say it would be bigger than the Oct 11th march,
kefir32 wrote: » I will pay for water but has to be commensurate reduction in usc and total abolition of Irish waster/water.
BoJack Horseman wrote: » Deflecting what exactly?
gladrags wrote: » A lie