nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Gameweek 10 transfers

G1032

Well
What are you all doing this week? After last weeks saga I think I'll just do Fabianski to either Krul or Foster. I'll free up 0.5m which might be needed to get Sanchez in soon

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Alfred Borden

Feel stupid for getting rid of Siggy but its the only way to work Sanchez into my team. taking comfort that he might be injured and his next three games are not too appealing anyways.

CSF

km79 wrote: »

Yes he would miss a very very easy game vs QPR and be well rested for Europe

And with Liverpool away the following week I thought it might not be outside the realms of possibility that Mourinho might do what he has done on a number of occasions at Real (I think it was under Mourinho at least) with the intentional suspensions.

Again, like a significant amount of my postings, probably wishful thinking.

km79

CSF wrote: »

If Fabregas was to play against Shrewsbury and be booked would he be out for this weekend's game?

Yes he would miss a very very easy game vs QPR and be well rested for Europe

CSF

If Fabregas was to play against Shrewsbury and be booked would he be out for this weekend's game?

Griever931

GiftofGab wrote: »

How much did you have in the bank?

1.2m

GiftofGab

Griever931 wrote: »

Hazard in for Sterling.

How much did you have in the bank?

Shedite27

Shedite27 wrote: »

West Ham Central @WestHam_Central
BREAKING: West Ham striker Diafra Sakho is FIT to play against Stoke City this weekend. (Via @SkySportsNewsHQ)
1:45 PM - 27 Oct 2014

Bugger. More reliable source....

Jack Sullivan @jsullivanwhu · 2h 2 hours ago
Sakho will be out for 1-4 weeks after Saturday's game ! Max out for 2 games

1 weeks is best case
4 weeks is worst case
#COYI #WHU

Griever931

Hazard in for Sterling.

Shedite27

Lemlin wrote: »

Sakho is apparently going to miss anything between two and four weeks.

West Ham Central @WestHam_Central
BREAKING: West Ham striker Diafra Sakho is FIT to play against Stoke City this weekend. (Via @SkySportsNewsHQ)
1:45 PM - 27 Oct 2014

Lemlin

Chesty08 wrote: »

Cheers for that.

With 0.1 ITB would you straight swap Sakho for someone & take 4 point hit or wait til wkend to hear more on the others

If you have a decent sub to come in, I'd leave it. Sakho will miss max 2 games it appears with the international break.

SantryRed

If Fabregas goes up another 0.1m, I can afford him to Hazard. Think I'll do that transfer once he goes up which I'd expect him to.

Am also tempted to go ADM -> Sanchez or Hazard, and possibly have 2 Chelsea midfielders and Costa. Think that might be overkill though.

Chesty08

Lemlin wrote: »

Costa should be fine by next weekend. Apparently he had a fitness test yesterday and they thought he was a bit "weak" to play. He trained on Saturday.

I'd also expect Siggy not to be too bad as he felt his groin before the game but still played.

Sakho is apparently going to miss anything between two and four weeks.

Cheers for that.

With 0.1 ITB would you straight swap Sakho for someone & take 4 point hit or wait til wkend to hear more on the others

Lemlin

Chesty08 wrote: »

Transferred in Sakho only now he's injured.

With Siggy &Costa in my team major surgery is needed.

What a mess I've put myself in

Costa should be fine by next weekend. Apparently he had a fitness test yesterday and they thought he was a bit "weak" to play. He trained on Saturday.

I'd also expect Siggy not to be too bad as he felt his groin before the game but still played.

Sakho is apparently going to miss anything between two and four weeks.

Chesty08

Transferred in Sakho only now he's injured.

With Siggy &Costa in my team major surgery is needed.

What a mess I've put myself in

PARlance

wonski wrote: »

I remember the same conversation last season and...it didn't happen.

Can't remember the details now.

Think that may have been Silva/City in Dec of last year iirc.

Shedite27

GiftofGab wrote: »

Can any Everton fans confirm if he will still get his game?

Nope, nobody can confirm that.

According to Everton fans, Alcaraz is rubbish, but Distin is the alternative. Distin was rumoured to have had a run in with the manager, but he played last week in Europe.

50/50 as to which will play any of the next 6 weeks.

wonski

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

I don't expect him to be in the squad tomorrow, but Mourinho is well known for having his players pick up deliberate bookings so they aren't suspended for key matches.

I remember the same conversation last season and...it didn't happen.

Can't remember the details now.

Ziegler1988

wonski wrote: »

Conspiracy theories are great but do you really think Fab will start this game?

I would expect reserves to play tbh.

All he need is to show up and take off his shirt for few seconds, though.

I don't expect him to be in the squad tomorrow, but Mourinho is well known for having his players pick up deliberate bookings so they aren't suspended for key matches.

wonski

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Exact move I'm considering. I'd probably captain Hazard as well.
If the conspiracy theorists are somehow correct that Cesc will play against Shrewsbury and deliberately pick up a yellow to be suspended for QPR, it will be Cesc to Hazard instead.

Conspiracy theories are great but do you really think Fab will start this game?

I would expect reserves to play tbh.

All he need is to show up and take off his shirt for few seconds, though.

Ziegler1988

Might as well stick with Aldy. Most people will be looking to get rid of their Southampton defenders in a few weeks anyway

larchielads

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Exact move I'm considering. I'd probably captain Hazard as well.
If the conspiracy theorists are somehow correct that Cesc will play against Shrewsbury and deliberately pick up a yellow to be suspended for QPR, it will be Cesc to Hazard instead.

I like your thinkin;) oh and would i be better off tradin up from alderwerield to clyne in the long run?

Ziegler1988

larchielads wrote: »

Adm to hazard next week lads what you think.?Adm v man city, hazard v qpr.

Exact move I'm considering. I'd probably captain Hazard as well.
If the conspiracy theorists are somehow correct that Cesc will play against Shrewsbury and deliberately pick up a yellow to be suspended for QPR, it will be Cesc to Hazard instead.

larchielads

Adm to hazard next week lads what you think.?Adm v man city, hazard v qpr.

mufcboy1999

I wouldn't get rid of adm, everything is going through him and United will score. My plan is to leave costa up top with ageuro and double up on United attacking cover with adm and Rooney after the city game.

I'll only have the one Chelsea player but costa when back will be on the end of most chances , out and out goal scorer.

My back line will be fairly weak bar baines when I bring Rooney in, I don't believe in playing for clean sheets anyway , very frustrating but baines is essentially a winger so he should continue to score points.

If ramsey hits form il downgrade sanchez to free up some money.

wonski

Copper_pipe wrote: »

I have exactly enough for ADM to Sanchez , would I be mad getting rid of ADM

I did it this gameweek - can't complain:D

It is 50/50. Sanchez is more likely to score while ADM to assist.
Wouldn't be sure who will get more points in next weeks tbh.

Copper_pipe

I have exactly enough for ADM to Sanchez , would I be mad getting rid of ADM

wonski

patmac wrote: »

Thinking ADM and Peile out for Sanchez and Welbeck, and -4 , or Sterling for Walcott and take a chance

Walcott hasn't even started yet. I would wait and see.

Pelle is in good form - not sure if replacing him with Welbeck is such a good idea. With Hull away and Leicester at home next I can see the Saints scoring few goals. And when they score, Pelle is involved.

GiftofGab

Iused2likebusts wrote: »

Stoke actually have the 3rd best defensive record in the league 10 goals conceded. However from a FF perspective they have the annoying habit of conceding 1 goal most weeks without ever getting well beaten.

I have Wilson in defence.

Stoke have a very tough set of fixtures coming up – West Ham (home), Spurs (away), Burnley (home), Liverpool (Away), Utd (Home), Arsenal (Away), Crystal Palace (Away), Chelsea (Home), Everton (Away).

I can’t see them getting many clean sheets at all. Realistically only about 1 clean sheet from the next 9 games.

Thinking of getting Alcarez for Everton. He’s only 4.3m so I can free up 0.2 m from selling Wilson.

Can any Everton fans confirm if he will still get his game?

wonski

kolczastyy wrote: »

Guys...Everybody rushed for Sanchez, but who have seen his goals vs. Hull? C'mon...It was right place right time imo.

I'd say Hazard is more profitable investment than Sanchez.

1. He costs 9,9 and Sanchez 10.3

2. Chelsea schedule:
QPR H
Liverpool A (never knows)
West Brom H
Sunderland A
Spurs H (Newcastle beat them up)
Newcastle A
Hull H

in comparison to Arsenal's schedule:

Burnley H
Swansea A (solid team)
United H (Rooney and Falcao will/could be back)
WBA A
Saints H (the best defence in PL)
Stoke A
Newcastle H

could look similar, but Arsenal has lack of consistency, regularity and a bit of tougher games, when Chelsea looks more and more like machine.

3. I keep Costa and have Fabs on the pitch, anyway consider next Chelsea's player.

4. I worry about rotations

What you guess?

You can't have them all, can you?

Both Sanchez and Hazard are players who can score in any game. Hazard was very close to score last night.

It is only a matter of time when Hazard hits double digits but I already have Fab and Costa so can't see a need for him at this moment.

Sanchez is 10.4 now btw.

Mr.Prodston

patmac wrote: »

Thinking ADM and Peile out for Sanchez and Welbeck, and -4 , or Sterling for Walcott and take a chance

Whatever about anything else it would be might brave to transfer Pelle out just yet.