housetypeb wrote: » Authors,not author. Do you get anything right?
There are eminent scientists on both sides of this debate ... and as far as I can see Dawinism is a 'dead duck' ... and Creation Science is making rapid strides.
M2M Spontaneous Evolution is impossible ... and I do have the qualifications to say that.
I have a well founded difference of scientific opinion with you ... nothing more or less. I have repeatedly asked ye to tell us what spontaneous mechanism provided the CFSI for NS to act upon ... and I haven't got a satisfatory answer. I have presented the basis for ID .. and again I haven't got any invalidating answers from ye to this either. ... just old guff about me being insane, a fraud, toxic, poisonous and any other word of derision that ye can get from a dictionary to name-call me and my ideas.
Squeedily Spooch wrote: » And Jesus cursing a fig tree? surely the creator of all the universe would know what seasons HE made the tree's bear fruit in?
J C wrote: » I can present the matter at hand.
housetypeb wrote: » You seem calmer,J C, basking in the afterglow?
J C wrote: » He did ... but that wasn't the point ... the tree was in full leaf and wasn't bearing any fruit ... even unripened fruit. ... so it was useless as a fig tree (by not providing food for people to eat) ... and it therefore was selected by Jesus to be destroyed.
J C wrote: » The ultimate Author was God (singular).
Squeedily Spooch wrote: » So he cursed a tree not bearing fruit to...not bear fruit?
Squeedily Spooch wrote: » That's like cursing a snake to forever crawl on it's belly. Wouldn't a snake already have been doing that? unless it...evolved.
Squeedily Spooch wrote: » So then he did want gays to be stoned to death? and women who were raped?
J C wrote: » He judged the tree and it died (physically). He judged Satan and he died (spiritually). ... and He will judge each one of us ... when we have chosen either eternal spiritual life or death.
Squeedily Spooch wrote: » But I won't be judged, you already said the rules don't apply if you're not of the same religion, so I get a free pass
housetypeb wrote: » So you turn the other cheek-but still protest? Logic has no meaning to you.
Supergurrier wrote: » Love how a thread about evolution has become about sexual preference and religion. (Neither of which I could care two hoots about as its none of my business what people do behind closed doors or choose to believe) You really couldnt make it up.
J C wrote: » Ordinary chemistry is an example of a deterministic system ... and it has predictable and certain results. However, DNA is an information containing molecule ... and it isn't a deterministic system.
J C wrote: » God is outside of man-made religions ... He will give each person (of all religions and none) the choice of being Saved or not ... of choosing eternal spiritual life or not.
Brian Shanahan wrote: » We have discovered over on A&A long ago that he is the anti-Spock. And yes that does also mean that he has a large ego which is easily bruised.
Supergurrier wrote: » Any Deity that would present those two options is not worthy of any kind of worship. It would be spite for spites sake. The whole ash and brimstone nonsense is just a control mechanism for people and organisations with agendas to get what they want in this life through fear shame and guilt
J C wrote: » Spock was a bit of an ego maniac know-it-all and a cold-fish. I'm happy to say I'm a warm-hearted Human Being, .:)
J C wrote: » It would be justice or mercy ... with the choice of which we want to receive up to each one of us ... and you can't get any fairer or more loving than that.:)
yellowlabrador wrote: » what exactly would a person be saved for? I think I'll give that one a miss.
J C wrote: » It is the Word of God as its writing was divinely inspired and is a true account of what happened in Old and New Testament times ... 'warts and all'.:)
J C wrote: » Spock was a bit of an ego maniac know-it-all and a cold-fish.:)
Bipolar Joe wrote: » Couple of things I always wondered:Another one is, if I don't believe in God, I don't get "Eternal spiritual life," I get death. If I'm dead, there's nothing? I'm asking because literally nothing seems super relaxing after an entire lifetime, and I don't want to have to go do more shit when I die.
Defender OF Faith wrote: » And why don't you believe in a God? can you give me a good reason why? I understand if you don't believe in religion, but I dont understand how can people reject the belief in god if they dont have a good reason for it
J C wrote: » I have answered all questions posed to me, in so far as time has permitted. You're the guys who haven't effectivley addressed my posting about the basis for ID ... despite a number of half-starts and failed attempts. ... and ye are also the guys now trying to derail the thread by attacking the person of Creationists with unfounded accusations of insanity rather than the addressing their ideas as they relate to Darwinism. Ye are the guys with all the invalid arguments ... and now ye have lowered yourselves and your arguments to the level unfounded name-calling.