Lucy and Harry wrote: » I never saw this Sivern fight but talk of it being a easy fight is harsh as all these guys can have their day every dog has his day and these guys can catch anybody with a punch or fluke kick to the jaw and its lights out.
Doubs wrote: » So disappointed in this matchmaking. We're not going to learn anything about Conor, it won't improve his ranking, so just seems like a waste of time. I'm a supporter of Conor so on the face of it I'm thinking I should be happy because (in my opinion) it's an easy fight for him, but at the same time I really didn't want to believe the stuff about the UFC handpicking his opponents, and I want to see him tested so the critics of his wrestling can be quietened. This fight pretty much confirms they've avoided wrestlers when choosing his opponents - they were talking about giving him a title shot and instead they give him someone who isn't even ranked? As I said in my earlier post, were plenty better options available. UFC protecting their cash cow ahead of a potential stadium in Ireland during the Summer anyone?
MagicIRL wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBfknA9nZro "Live" Q&A. It's not streaming yet but says "Starting Soon..."
EuskalHerria wrote: » Hostile crowd, can't have been unexpected though really. Edit: Who thought just having Conor for the Q&A was a good idea?
ASOT wrote: » Would have been hostile to anyone who isnt Brazilian id imagine but they seem really riled up, first time iv seen someone get to Conor when they were talkign about his parents. Really annoying there not translating the questions to us.
EuskalHerria wrote: » That translator seems like he wants to be elsewhere. Also the microphones look likes hostages in the crowd.
unknown13 wrote: » This is pathetic from Brazilian fans, they give it and go nuts when their fighters all they want but cannot take abuse in the slightest, when it comes back their way.
CurryFlavoured wrote: » Conor saying 'talk is cheap'...Oh the irony. This isn't very enjoyable, I'm enjoying how little Conor gives a fcuk though.
civis_liberalis wrote: » Conor can say that, since he has been backing it up.
CurryFlavoured wrote: » Conor could probably blow up a building full of orphans and people would find a way of justifying it though. I found it funny that he said that.