Mint Sauce wrote: » Maybe they were waiting till after The Fleadh. Traffic was already bad enough on the releif road was parts of the town centre closed to traffic.
BASHIR wrote: » Ah ya forgot about that! That makes more sense all right. Not gonna be fun driving home for a couple of weeks.
rizzodun wrote: » At the risk of sounding pedantic can't someone point out to me where sligo city is exactly? It'll be interesting to see the final layout, this is badly needed but I wonder will there be some sort of bottleneck where it'll narrow back down to one or two lanes. As a frequent user of the bridge for years I never got over the amount of oneupmanship where the lanes merge closer to statoil, I've had a few close calls there. While the bridge is not the greatest landmark, I hope the cycleway/footpath they hang off the side don't blight it too much.
dingding wrote: » Inside the city loop near the city core.
Vlove wrote: » They should really do the JFK Bridge as well!
Mint Sauce wrote: » Lol at Ocean FM reporting continuing work on the bridge. I have seen no evidence yet. Think they only signed contracts this week.
Bodidly wrote: » On Tuesday there was around 6 guys in yellow jackets standing around feehilys funeral home and along the bridge. Looked like they were assessing the amount of traffic or something like that. Would say this is going to be a long drawn out pain in the backside!
Mint Sauce wrote: » SatNav was showing works in progess and moderate traffic this evening only about an hour ago. Would have thought works started, would have actually meant machinery, noise, and congestion. Not fellas during survey work and signing contracts.
rizzodun wrote: » this may be wishful thinking though.
Corvus Maximus wrote: » Maybe? I'm afraid it probably is wishful thinking.
rizzodun wrote: » Isn't probably just a synonym of maybe? :P
rizzodun wrote: » Maybe they're taking the 'measure twice, cut once' approach, I have no problem having them stand around with clipboards and laser pointers for weeks if it shortens the overall time spent actually causing the disruption, this may be wishful thinking though.
sligono1 wrote: » They were locating and marking the services important part of the start up folks you just don't drop in track machines and breakers and go hell for leather. Some people hinting that they were wasting time.The job will have a tight time line had to be finished by the end of July. And there will be a lot of whining about traffic disruption and there will be a lot of that.but you have to expect disruption to get these improvements and there never is a right time to these type of road jobs.
rizzodun wrote: » Like I said, I have no problem with all plane prep if it minimises disruption, let's hope the finish it in the timeframe given. As a thought, is O'Connell st still being closed? Wouldn't it be worth holding off closing the street as it is one of the alternative routes across town?
Mint Sauce wrote: » Looking at the work so far, I'm still wondering how this will finally look. Are the new foot paths going to be joined on to the exsisting structure, or are they going to be a totally seperate structure? It currenlty looks like they are putting in some kind of foundation on the south bound approach on the bundoran rd side.