EazyD wrote: » I'm not thick, I realise any water you buy/consume has trace elements. That doesn't explain why there is excess amounts of visible particulates floating in the glass.
Barely There wrote: » Get your water tested and see if it complies with EU drinking water regulations. If it does, you've nothing to be complaining about.
EazyD wrote: » So you would have no problem paying for that glass of water which I posted on the previous page?
papu wrote: » Biologically speaking it is better for you. Why are you so caught up with the aesthetics?
EazyD wrote: » You might be one to enjoy a creamy glass of water but I think I speak for most people when I say it isn't acceptable.
papu wrote: » Throw the glass into the fridge , decant the clear water , whatever helps curb your child like fussiness.
Banjo String wrote: » Expecting water to look like water, and not a glass of milk is childlike fussiness. Jesus wept.
papu wrote: » Crying over excess calcium, because of natural processes?
zerks wrote: » Tell that to the people who spend fortunes getting treatment kits or replacing wrecked appliances. IW told the people of Sth. Wexford that treating the water is not their problem,they want money for the water so imo it is their problem.
Barely There wrote: » You opinion won't count for much if the water complies with EU standards I'm afraid.
Going Forward wrote: » but if IW refuse to address the problem, refusing to pay for such water would be the first step in the process.
Going Forward wrote: » If the product supplied is damaging appliances, consumer regulations may apply and recourse should be sought. That was the opinion of a barrister interviewed by Sean O Rourke about a year ago.
Going Forward wrote: » If the product supplied is damaging appliances, consumer regulations may apply and recourse should be sought. That was the opinion of a barrister interviewed by Sean O Rourke about a year ago. I'm not sure how it would fare, but if IW refuse to address the problem, refusing to pay for such water would be the first step in the process.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » If that was the case then why haven't the local authorities been held responsibility in the past?
Little CuChulainn wrote: » IW didn't invent hard water.
Going Forward wrote: » I don't know if it was ever pursued TBH. No, but they'll be billing people for it. And it's damaging appliances.
Going Forward wrote: » No, but they'll be billing people for it. And it's damaging appliances.
Barely There wrote: » If it's such an issue for you, why didn't you do something about it before now?
Chance The Fapper wrote: » How do you know what he did or didn't do?.
Chance The Fapper wrote: » Either way, there's a difference between getting a free inadequate service, and having to pay for inadequate service .
Barely There wrote: » He can't have done much if it's still a problem. You don't pay taxes I assume.
Chance The Fapper wrote: » How do you know what he did or didn't do? Either way, there's a difference between getting a free inadequate service, and having to pay for inadequate service Barely There wrote: » You don't pay taxes I assume. .
Barely There wrote: » You don't pay taxes I assume.
Going Forward wrote: » I'd be interested in knowing why you're so protective of Irish Water and so dismissive of the public experiencing problems with the product?
