cgcsb wrote: » The bus takes three hours, and is subject to traffic at Both ends of the journey where as the train takes 2:30 and is by all accounts a more comfortable journey
cgcsb wrote: » Re: onward connections Cork's suburbs are hardly 'inaccessible' by public transport. Also you are incorrect on cost. Dublin-Cork €15 each way plus cork city bus journey €1.90 each way. That's about €33.80 round trip, which is impossible by car regardless of how efficient your engine is.
LeinsterDub wrote: » My car holds 5 at (basically) no extra cost 33.80 * 5 is 169 euro . At that's the cheapest fair! When I said hinterland I should of said more difficult as instead of inaccessible
The fact that their is no longer a airline route between Cork and Dublin, clearly shows that their is little appetite for a high speed rail line. Pure fantasy stuff, there is simply no economic justification for it.
monument wrote: » Still not sure what your point is -- nobody, not a single poster is saying rail is better for every trip all the time.
LeinsterDub wrote: » My points is the road is better for most trips , most of the time in Ireland .At least in my personal experience.
bk wrote: » High speed train to Cork, Haha!!! Ireland is barely suited to having normal standard intercity rail, never mind high speed. Ireland pretty much couldn't be less suited to intercity rail: - Really only one large city - Small country, relatively short distances between cities - Excellent motorway network The reality is the population of Cork is barely big enough to justify intercity rail, never mind high speed rail. At the moment the journey times are: - Car 2h 20mins - Train 2h 30mins - Bus 3hours Though in my experience the bus and train are about the same when you take into account the time it takes to get to and from Hueston. Car is actually significantly faster as it would be door to door. If you want to add a quicker option to that, then it would be far cheaper for the government to spend a fraction of the €10 billion it would cost to build hs rail and instead subsidise a Cork to Dublin airplane route, along with a priority security lines at the airport. You would then have a 45 minute journey time option at a fraction of the cost. With the remaining €9.5 Billion you could then build actually useful projects like Metro North and Dart Underground and probably even have some left over for an extra Luas line in Dublin and maybe a BRT or two down in Cork. All money far better spent. The fact that their is no longer a airline route between Cork and Dublin, clearly shows that their is little appetite for a high speed rail line. Pure fantasy stuff, there is simply no economic justification for it.
bk wrote: » High speed train to Cork, Haha!!! Ireland is barely suited to having normal standard intercity rail, never mind high speed. Ireland pretty much couldn't be less suited to intercity rail: - Really only one large city - Small country, relatively short distances between cities - Excellent motorway network The reality is the population of Cork is barely big enough to justify intercity rail, never mind high speed rail.
bk wrote: » At the moment the journey times are: - Car 2h 20mins - Train 2h 30mins - Bus 3hours
bk wrote: » Though in my experience the bus and train are about the same when you take into account the time it takes to get to and from Hueston.
bk wrote: » If you want to add a quicker option to that, then it would be far cheaper for the government to spend a fraction of the €10 billion it would cost to build hs rail and instead subsidise a Cork to Dublin airplane route, along with a priority security lines at the airport. You would then have a 45 minute journey time option at a fraction of the cost.
bk wrote: » The fact that their is no longer a airline route between Cork and Dublin, clearly shows that their is little appetite for a high speed rail line. Pure fantasy stuff, there is simply no economic justification for it.
LeinsterDub wrote: » My car holds 5 at (basically) no extra cost 33.80 * 5 is 169 euro . At that's the cheapest fair! When I said hinterland I should of said more difficult instead of inaccessible
monument wrote: » But we're not talking most trips, most of the time in Ireland. We're talking about Dublin-Cork and everything that goes with Belfast-Dublin-(Limerick)-Cork service. 1. The thread has gone beyond talking about the OP's suggestion. 2. The island should be looked at, not just Cork and Dublin. 4. I like the suggestion from Victor of not only including Belfast-Dublin-Cork but putting Limerick in there too.
monument wrote: » 3. Not sure why people can see road projects as a list of priorities but public transport is treated as if they all have to be built within the same few years.
cgcsb wrote: » Uninformed drivel.
cgcsb wrote: » Austria, Denmark, Sweden etc. all serve similar population corridores with electrified railways in excess of 200km/hr running speeds. A City like Cork if locateed in on mainland Europe would have a comprehensive electrified commuter rail network.
cgcsb wrote: » The journey time between Dublin and Cork cannot be achieved within the law under 2h40mins, and that's 120km/h the whole way, with an express toll tag and you'd really want to be flooring it.
cgcsb wrote: » It takes 10 mins to get to Abbey St from Heuston.
cgcsb wrote: » Ridiculous, the subsidy to Dublin-Cork flights was stopped, it is an environmentally unsustainable transport solution. The air route was cancelled due to cancelled subsidy and by virtue of the fact that rail was faster.
Of course I don't believe that is the whole story, more that Ryanair put totally uneconomical 737's multiple times of the day on the route to kill off Aerlingus/Aerarran. Once they killed off the competition they pulled out.
cgcsb wrote: » you can buy family tickets and group tickets at a discount.
bk wrote: » All are very mountainous and snowy countries where it is hard to build roads and they tend to be dangerous (snow) even when you do. Rail makes a lot of sense in these countries.
bk wrote: » And that's the difference between rail fans and normal people. Normal people don't care about the theory, what they can actually do is what they care about.
bk wrote: » Actually I don't believe Ryanair ever received a subsidy for the route.
bk wrote: » And how was rail faster?!! The flight is about 45 minutes!
bk wrote: » If your argument is based on the environment, then we should close intercity rail and replace it all with bus services instead as intercity buses are actually more fuel efficient and produce less co2 per passenger then diesel trains.
Aard wrote: » For the train service to Cork to be better frequented, the stations at either end need to act more hub-like. If people can't get to the stations easily by public transport, then they're more likely to simply stay in the car for the whole journey. Quite understandable. Heuston is 2.5km from Dublin 2, the business centre of Ireland. It has decent bus/Luas services to the city centre business and retail core. But it has terrible services to most of the more residential parts of the city. People are unlikely to want to take two busses to the train station, yet many direct bus routes to Heuston would be unviable. I've mentioned before about extending the 17 or 46a to Heuston. These might work, but would either reduce frequencies or necessitate more busses on the routes. So in order to make such services (and more) viable -- there needs to be a reason for them to go to Heuston other than to meet the train. This means making Heuston a destination. There are plans for a certain amount of redevelopment in the area in the form of offices. Completing these would ensure the demand for both long distance train and local bus services. Expanding the functions of the city centre westward instead of the prevailing pattern of eastwards (Docklands) would also be beneficial for the city for many reasons irrelevant to this particular thread. This development model of combining land use and transport planning has been absent from Irish plans so far. There is a fantastic example of this in Holland -- the Stedenbaan project in South Holland. An improved (not necessarily high speed) rail service between Cork and Dublin would benefit enormously from the ideas of that Dutch project.
Aard wrote: » I wouldn't hold my breath for Kent-SSG services just yet. But were that to be realised it would be fantastic for both Dublin and Cork. The Docklands redevelopment in Cork is vitally important too. I'm unfamiliar with public transport in Cork, but iirc the train station is close to many bus routes, which works in Cork's favour.
Aard wrote: » I'm unfamiliar with public transport in Cork, but iirc the train station is close to many bus routes, which works in Cork's favour.
zetalambda wrote: » I'd agree with you pretty much on all points except that Dublin is a big city. If you think it is, you need to get out of the country a bit more. Or do you mean in an Irish context?
Idbatterim wrote: » Also why cant you get a tram on the green line to tallaght direct? say every second tram would go to broadstone? Having to change is PITA! particularly if weather is bad...
bk wrote: » I suppose I meant it in more of the terms that most economists say that it is only economically worth running intercity rail between two cities when each city has 1 million+ population. We have only one such city. Thus the reason (amongst others) that intercity rail struggles so badly here.
Idbatterim wrote: » with the luas at stephens green, could they put a glass box in effect over it, so that you could stay under constant cover when changing between it and MN or DU?
Idbatterim wrote: » Also why cant you get a tram on the green line to tallaght direct?
Idbatterim wrote: » say every second tram would go to broadstone? Having to change is PITA! particularly if weather is bad.
Idbatterim wrote: » Likewise with metro north, would it not have made sense to made the current green line, the same guage?
Helsinki-Tallinn tunnel proposals look to bring cities closer than ever Drifting apart since the first Bronze Age fortifications were built, the Baltic Finns populating opposite sides of the Gulf of Finland were for centuries separated by empire, ideology and cold sea. Now, the historic brethren of present-day Estonia and Finland could be directly linked, as plans accelerate for a 50-mile tunnel running between their capital cities.
BoatMad wrote: » Seeking minute decreases in the passangers total journey time
Victor wrote: » No, people are seeking material decreases in journey times. It means things like trains leaving on time (trains have often left Cork 5-7 minutes late for no obvious reason), removing individual speed restrictions (often a short bridge that imposes a speed limit for several miles), removing pathing conflicts on single-track sections, having appropriate stop patterns and appropriately-timed and meaningful connections. Running at 250 km/h probably isn't needed, but 160km/h for most of the journey is eminently possible for InterCity. Not much use crying over Mark 3s, because they are all gone.
marmurr1916 wrote: » What is the distance by rail between Cork and Dublin?
Victor wrote: » 165.5 miles (266 km) Heuston to Cork Kent. A little bit more to the respective city centres.