emo72 wrote: » Whoever is on the ballot paper minus FF/FG/labour. That's where votes will go.
Chance The Fapper wrote: » What happens when I don't register at my rental address? They chase the landlord?
Little CuChulainn wrote: » So Sinn Fein who plan to privatise IW? Good plan.
emo72 wrote: » Haha. Only 4 choices on the ballot paper in a general election. Have you ever voted?
Little CuChulainn wrote: » So you're ruling out Sinn Fein too? Do you understand how our system works? It's controlled by political whip, for better or worse. If you want to vote for an independent or loony party because you think they will run the country well then thats fine. If you do it as some protest then you'd be better not voting. Fine Gael got in because of your kind of voting.
emo72 wrote: » I voted in the local elections. Sdcc is my area. A mixture of independents and smaller parties have control there. It works fine. Basically the nightmare scenario of independents is not as disastrous as the supporters of the main parties would have is believe. Don't worry about it.
BoJack Horseman wrote: » Cos national level works just the same as a powerless local council.
mikom wrote: » Did someone say Sinn Fein?
Satriale wrote: » I dont think the landlord can be responsible for your bills, and if he gives them your pps number i think he may be in breach of data protection. Write "Chance the Fapper" on the form for the craic and return it.:pac::pac::pac:
Chance The Fapper wrote: » My landlord doesn't have my PPS, and I'm not sending the form back to them at all. Landlord is lovely though, would rather not have them being chased for it
Banjo String wrote: » They wont be chased for it. Al the landlord has to do is prove they are not living in the house/its rented out.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » Implying SF isn't a protest vote.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » They're quite adept at manipulating their target audience into believing in them. Your pps isn't required to bill you.
Chance The Fapper wrote: » But how do they know who I am?
Chance The Fapper wrote: » What if they haven't registered?
Banjo String wrote: » It isn't up to them to register a house they have rented out AFAIK. Only the house in which they live in.
DamagedTrax wrote: » denis has been watching you closely...
Little CuChulainn wrote: » They're quite adept at manipulating their target audience into believing in them..
Little CuChulainn wrote: » Your pps isn't required to bill you.
Banjo String wrote: » I imagine a name would help though, because 'when all these court case come up', its gonna be fierce hard to summons an actual house (address only) or an 'occupier'.
BoJack Horseman wrote: » O'Brien command HQ
BoJack Horseman wrote: » "Don Incognito" will be Ireland's most wanted man.
Banjo String wrote: » Like FG so. Who, not only were against an LPT in the pre election manifesto, but then later introduced one anyway, and went on to tell us more spoofs about where the money would be 100% be ringfenced for. (hint, it wasn't setting up Irish water and their mates)
Iwasfrozen wrote: » Actually Fine Gael stated they would introduce water charges in their manifesto. Sinn Fein on the other had have said they will privatize Irish water.
Banjo String wrote: » Which is why I mentioned an LPT and didn't mention the water charge. And if SF ever get into power and do a similar U-turn, I'll ridicule them.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » Ok so you avoided mentioning water charges in the water charges thread and spoke exclusively on lpt because that suits your argument? Ok.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » They're quite adept at manipulating their target audience into believing in them.
Like FG so. Who, not only were against an LPT in the pre election manifesto, but then later introduced one anyway, and went on to tell us more spoofs about where the money would be 100% be ringfenced for. (hint, it wasn't setting up Irish water and their mates)
Banjo String wrote: » He obviously hasn't noticed that that's exactly where it comes from lol.
Banjo String wrote: » Ok. So if you bothered to read what I was responding to, It would be clear to all as to why you're choosing to pedantic, and not even try to defend the blatant lies, and blatant 'mismanagement' of money for the Local Property Tax , that was to be ring fenced for Local services. It wasn't to be spent on setting up a quango. (ok?) So if you'd like to discuss that, lets play.
