nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Darwin's theory

lanomist

just a question, If Darwins theory on evolution, that humankind evolved from apes, why are there still apes out there ?

Find more posts tagged with

puffins

in limbo

Quick Links

Comments

Brian Shanahan

SaveOurLyric wrote: »

I think so. Their adherence to these old ideas stands out particularly from their ability to reason or be correct about most other matters in modern life.

No it doesn't. Creatards are among the least well able to live in the modern world with modern concepts of right and wrong, an inability to interact properly or accept modern standards of medicine, technology, human rights (especially those of women). Creatardism exists solely amongst the fundamentalist fringes of religions, especially the three abrahamic ones. It is the pet "science" of the charedim in judaism, the likes of al-qaeda and isis in islam and the likes of Westboro baptist church in christianity. Other things all three strands share is a commitment to founding intolerant religious theocracies within their own countries and waging aggressive and genocidal wars against all non-believers (i.e. those who disagree with them to even the smallest degree), a rampant and opressive misogyny which is sanctioned by their "religious laws" (of them all the charedim are actually the worst, they literally treat their women like pack animals), and a fundamental disregard for any aspect of science or technology which shows their religious worldview to be misguided and wrong.

The people who support creatardism are the most blinkered, obnoxious and offensive people around. The most definitely are not able to reason nor are they correct about any other aspect of the modern world (with the exception of their leaders, who are cynically manipulating the backwardness and ignorance of their followers for personal gain and definitely don't follow the strictures they preach).

Is their any other aspect of thought where otherwise sensible people can be so blind to the facts in front of them ? I feel it has a deeper cause.

That's the thing, the people who believe in something so fundamentally wrong have had their minds so warped by religious indoctrination and bigotry that I honestly don't think they can possibly think sensibly in any area. They are so far removed from reality with their fantastical fundamentalist fervour that they are incapable of living in any sort of modern society (if you look at all the fundamentalist churches, one of their main aims is to return the world to a "golden age" buried in the far past, where people were almost universally ignorant and it is supposed that the lower orders knew their place and always kowtowed to their rulers {such a time never having really existed, the poor having almost universally to be kept down by brute force and fear}).

Brian Shanahan

Chunners wrote: »

Angles are alien lifeforms.

That'll come as a suprise to most of the English, a fair proportion of Scots, Germans and Danes too, seeing that their ancestors were from another planet.

Sorry couldn't resist a chuckle when I saw that typo.

SaveOurLyric

Brian Shanahan wrote: »

No it doesn't. Creatards...............by brute force and fear}).

Was not my point. It was not on creationism as you answer it, rather on the general myths of religions.

Plenty of people who are otherwise normal, functional, educated, intelligent, fully integrated members of modern society, holding office and high level jobs, still distinguish themselves on this one topic of following one of the organised myth religions. (They see themselves, and are indeed, miles from the lunatic fringe of Westboro church, ISIS or religious states.) Yet still believe much of the core of their religion against their reason and knowledge, even if parking issues like creationism.

JC01

Chunners wrote: »

And yet again Godwins law is proven

Granted it was a lazy response but my point stands. It's that kind of logic from religious quarters that does my head in.
"Ah sure loads of people beleive and some of them are smart so of course there right" you could use the same logic with Santa.

nozzferrahhtoo

SaveOurLyric wrote: »

Plenty of people who are otherwise normal, functional, educated, intelligent, fully integrated members of modern society, holding office and high level jobs, still distinguish themselves on this one topic of following one of the organised myth religions.

I already gave you a post above answering what such people might still believe in a god or gods or religions. I hope it was useful to you.

However we could add another question to yours. How many of the people, in such positions as you describe, who purport to follow a religion.... actually do believe it at all?

Take the US for example. Those running for office there have to claim to be religious or they simply will not have an electoral chance. Even those who appear to have no religious belief at all really, will gravitate towards SOME religion for political reasons. John Hickenlooper for example aligns himself with the Quakers, but anyone who discusses religion with him, as I have, will find he appears to have little to no actual belief in deities.

Daniel Dennet speaks at length to this too. He has something called the "clergy project" which is a totally anonymous support group supporting people in roles like Pastors who simply do not believe any more, or never did. He also writes at length about the concept of "belief in belief" which is that a large number of people might not have religious or supernatural beliefs, but for some reason think it is a good thing to act like you do, or to maintain it in others.

So in short: The answer to your question is NOT short. The reasons why otherwise educated and intelligent people think there is a god, or purport to even when they do not, are too numerous to mention in anything shorter than a book.

Tordelback

Brian Shanahan wrote: »

That's the thing, the people who believe in something so fundamentally wrong have had their minds so warped by religious indoctrination and bigotry that I honestly don't think they can possibly think sensibly in any area.

To be fair, people in general trundle through life believing things for which there is no evidence, or which rational analysis completely contradicts: it's only when they get organised and try to impose these beliefs on others that we notice that this is going on (see also: anti-vaccination, anti-flouride, truthers, birthers, climate-change deniers).

Meanwhile people who pass for completely normal routinely act as if that incredibly-safe flight is more dangerous than the comparatively-lethal drive to the airport, or that ISIS' beheadings represent a savage end to our way of life while Saudi Arabia's beheadings are no reason not to go over to work there for a year or two, make a bit of cash like.

Us people just amn't the brighterest.

Squeedily Spooch

J C wrote: »

... and you have an unfounded faith that He doesn't exist.:)

It's about as unfounded as unicorns. Zero evidence in a mythical being.

Thargor

Squeedily Spooch wrote: »

It's about as unfounded as unicorns. Zero evidence in a mythical being.

Yeah that shows what a warped view J C has of how these things work, strange for someone who's always boasting about his scientific credentials (without revealing what they are). Every scientist on the planet will instantly "believe" in unicorns the day a single piece of incontrovertible evidence is recorded for them, same for flying pigs, same for gods.

Squeedily Spooch

Thargor wrote: »

Yeah that shows what a warped view J C has of how these things work, strange for someone who's always boasting about his scientific credentials (without revealing what they are). Every scientist on the planet will instantly "believe" in unicorns the day a single piece of incontrovertible evidence is recorded for them, same for flying pigs, same for gods.

The whole "ho ho! you atheists with your faith in no God!" level of debate is clutching at straws so much he could make a scarecrow and pray to God to magic it a brain out of thin air. It'd probably know more about science than him.

Scientific views have changed a lot over time, from the earth being flat to what causes certain things to happen. Yet there's religion still grounded in myth and magic. If God did indeed create the universe, it still makes little to no sense that he would break all these natural and physical rules for a small group of people in a specific time in a specific part of the world where there were no eyewitnesses accounts until decades after the fact. If he truly was THE God then why don't Native Americans or South American tribes or Aboriginals or any other race of people have any accounts of Jesus or Yahweh? How utterly convenient that the Big Book Of Myth and Magic can explain all the origins of life on earth for it's intended audience only.

Tordelback

Thargor wrote: »

Every scientist on the planet will instantly "believe" in unicorns the day a single piece of incontrovertible evidence is recorded for them, same for flying pigs, same for gods.

I don't think hardcore creationists get this part at all.

If someone popped up tomorrow with incontrovertible evidence of intelligent mammalian life in the Cretaceous, palaeontologists would be electrified - certainly there'd be career chaos and some pretty violent conferences, but once the dust had settled palaeontology would excitedly devote itself to documenting it and working out how it happened - not denying it because their old books said so.

This goes for all science: new evidence, new theories = excitement and purpose.

Vivisectus

SaveOurLyric wrote: »

Was not my point. It was not on creationism as you answer it, rather on the general myths of religions.

Plenty of people who are otherwise normal, functional, educated, intelligent, fully integrated members of modern society, holding office and high level jobs, still distinguish themselves on this one topic of following one of the organised myth religions. (They see themselves, and are indeed, miles from the lunatic fringe of Westboro church, ISIS or religious states.) Yet still believe much of the core of their religion against their reason and knowledge, even if parking issues like creationism.

But then again you have to realize that religious beliefs tend to be carefully insulated from the rest of reality: religious truth and everyday truth tend to get treated very differently, and very few religious people extend their religious beliefs to everyday expectations.

Hence very few adult Christians pray for severed limbs to magically re-grow, for instance. Divine magic is always indistinguishable from things that sometimes happen by chance, or far in the past. One of the functions of religious instruction seems to be to facilitate this compartmentalization and to allow the believer to hold magical beliefs without too much cognitive dissonance.

floggg

Squeedily Spooch wrote: »

The whole "ho ho! you atheists with your faith in no God!" level of debate is clutching at straws so much he could make a scarecrow and pray to God to magic it a brain out of thin air. It'd probably know more about science than him.

Scientific views have changed a lot over time, from the earth being flat to what causes certain things to happen. Yet there's religion still grounded in myth and magic. If God did indeed create the universe, it still makes little to no sense that he would break all these natural and physical rules for a small group of people in a specific time in a specific part of the world where there were no eyewitnesses accounts until decades after the fact. If he truly was THE God then why don't Native Americans or South American tribes or Aboriginals or any other race of people have any accounts of Jesus or Yahweh? How utterly convenient that the Big Book Of Myth and Magic can explain all the origins of life on earth for it's intended audience only.

It's also pretty ****ty of him not to announce his existence to them, and then condemn for worshiping false idols when they thank the sun for its life giving energy.

Squeedily Spooch

floggg wrote: »

It's also pretty ****ty of him not to announce his existence to them, and then condemn for worshiping false idols when they thank the sun for its life giving energy.

Ah the old do people who are unaware of Jesus get into heaven, why of course they do they just get asked at the gates if they like the cut of his jib. Never mind your sun worship and sacred buffalo and eagles it's all about the Jewish zombie with the magic act. He's your man for eternal happiness.

floggg

Vivisectus wrote: »

But then again you have to realize that religious beliefs tend to be carefully insulated from the rest of reality: religious truth and everyday truth tend to get treated very differently, and very few religious people extend their religious beliefs to everyday expectations.

Hence very few adult Christians pray for severed limbs to magically re-grow, for instance. Divine magic is always indistinguishable from things that sometimes happen by chance, or far in the past. One of the functions of religious instruction seems to be to facilitate this compartmentalization and to allow the believer to hold magical beliefs without too much cognitive dissonance.

I think a lot of the time, beliefs and the benefits become so important to people that they choose to suspend their disbelief.

As even JC acknowledges, if they allow themselves to doubt some aspects they open all of them up to scrutiny.

But if you rely on beliefs to provide yourself with comfort in better times, as a coping mechanism to deal with grief or loss or to give you a purpose you feel you otherwise lack, then a part of you knows that you can't even give voice to any doubts or countenance any criticism in case you end up losing all that.

And there are undoubtedly benefits to believes. I know myself as an atheist I wish I could console others at times of bereavement that their loved one is in a better place, or that they'll be together again on heaven.

While I know it's not true, I know believing that could provide comfort to them.

So the question isn't always how they can believe, its why might they want.

MrPudding

floggg wrote: »

It's also pretty ****ty of him not to announce his existence to them, and then condemn for worshiping false idols when they thank the sun for its life giving energy.

It gets worse. I was having this discussion on the christianity forum. One of the old moderators of the christianity was suggesting that miracles were evidence of the existence of god. I asked 'what about people that don't follow you god that say they have had miracles.' His answer was that his god, the christian one, would occasionally grant miracles to followers of other religions or gods. My view on this is, what an utter cnut. Here we have a guy praying to his god, not the christian god, for a miracle. The christian god grants that miracle, thereby going someway to confirming in this poor chaps mind that he is praying to the correct god, and then when he dies the christian god gives him the big fcuk you for following the wrong god. He is an awful prick this god fellow.

MrP

Squeedily Spooch

MrPudding wrote: »

It gets worse. I was having this discussion on the christianity forum. One of the old moderators of the christianity was suggesting that miracles were evidence of the existence of god. I asked 'what about people that don't follow you god that say they have had miracles.' His answer was that his god, the christian one, would occasionally grant miracles to followers of other religions or gods. My view on this is, what an utter cnut. Here we have a guy praying to his god, not the christian god, for a miracle. The christian god grants that miracle, thereby going someway to confirming in this poor chaps mind that he is praying to the correct god, and then when he dies the christian god gives him the big fcuk you for following the wrong god. He is an awful prick this god fellow.

MrP

What absolute waffle, it's right in the 10 Commandments to not worship other gods, so why would he grant people who break a rule he holds more serious than rape (not a Commandment), miracles?

He works in mysterious ways or some other such nonsense I bet.

It's pretty self evident that Christianity as a whole is just a self contradicting belief. If we didn't come from a guy magicked out of thin air and a woman magicked out of his rib (we didn't) then there was no original sin. No original sin means no reason for Jesus to "sacrifice" himself (for like..a weekend) so no need for Christianity. That's why Creation loons cling desperately to beliefs they know deep down can't possible be true. Because the notion we didn't come from two people in a garden means their entire belief system is build on a falsehood.

God creates man and woman, gives them free will to do what he knows they'll do anyway, negating their own choices. God condemns all of mankind forever more because they used their choice he granted them to disobey him, sends his son Kal-el..I mean Jesus, to Earth to perform magic tricks and curse at fig trees. Dies for a whole long weekend, comes back to life not a bother, returns back to God/himself as some great sacrifice. People told to believe in all this or spend eternity in a lake of fire, but only because God "loves" you. No wonder childhood indoctrination is the preferred method of religions for latching onto people's spiritual wellbeings. If anyone went through life and heard all this as a grown adult for the first time they'd think it was lunacy.

looksee

I don't recall the 'cursing a fig tree' bit?

Delirium

looksee wrote: »

I don't recall the 'cursing a fig tree' bit?

Link

12 The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. 13 Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. 14 Then he said to the tree, “May no one ever eat fruit from you again.” And his disciples heard him say it.

Brian Shanahan

SaveOurLyric wrote: »

Plenty of people who are otherwise normal, functional, educated, intelligent, fully integrated members of modern society, holding office and high level jobs, still distinguish themselves on this one topic of following one of the organised myth religions. (They see themselves, and are indeed, miles from the lunatic fringe of Westboro church, ISIS or religious states.) Yet still believe much of the core of their religion against their reason and knowledge, even if parking issues like creationism.

But you see, they don't. How many Irish catholics follow church teaching on divorce, contraception or homsexuality, to name just three current examples? Even in more general terms what the churches teach and what the well adjusted members of society (even if they profess belief in a specific religion) are poles apart.

irish coldplayer

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

Would it not have been easier to just miracle some fruit on the tree

He is one third of the being that created the universe, all knowing and omnipotent.
Yet somehow he doesn't know the time of year when fig trees bare fruit?
And then he curses the fig tree? It wasn't the fig trees fault that it was the wrong time of year...

Squeedily Spooch

irish coldplayer wrote: »

He is one third of the being that created the universe, all knowing and omnipotent.
Yet somehow he doesn't know the time of year when fig trees bare fruit?
And then he curses the fig tree? It wasn't the fig trees fault that it was the wrong time of year...

And then because he got the hump over it being the wrong season, the tree was cursed to lose it's purpose in life, to bear fruit and multiply. Jesus was an asshole is the moral of the tale.

Tordelback

irish coldplayer wrote: »

He is one third of the being that created the universe, all knowing and omnipotent.
Yet somehow he doesn't know the time of year when fig trees bare fruit?
And then he curses the fig tree? It wasn't the fig trees fault that it was the wrong time of year...

It's probably a waddayacallit metaphor. For something or other. Bible's full of 'em, just a mess of allegories, parables and koans. Except for the bits about the Flood. And homosexuals. Those bits are absolutely literal.

Funny way for an omnipotent being to write a world history/rulebook/guide to life all the same.

looksee

Well there's a thing! I thought I had a pretty good knowledge of the bible, being brought up a protestant and being a Sunday school teacher and studying it (as a subject) in school. But I never came across the little strop about the fig tree! Maybe all the huffing and puffing in the temple might not have happened if he had not been so irritated by the unfortunate tree!

Squeedily Spooch

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

Its God-given purpose at that. So basically he designed the tree to act in a certain way, then threw a huff because it obeyed the rules he placed on it (as its creator).

Bible logic :pac:

There's a nice parallel to Adam and Eve there too, God designs something to act a certain way (be it growing fruit at a particular time of year, or a species with free will and the ability to disobey) then throwing a hissy fit because his creations act like how he designed them to. So cursing a tree to not do it's one intended thing anymore, and condemning all mankind becaue of the actions of two people.

You'd wonder why if God just craved unconditional love and worship he didn't just start over, ah crap these two aren't gonna act like how I think they should, I better just make new, obedient people instead.

Ever see the Matrix sequels? when the Architect talks about how the original Matrix was a paradise and humans rejected it, tons of religious symbolism in those films.

floggg

Tordelback wrote: »

It's probably a waddayacallit metaphor. For something or other. Bible's full of 'em, just a mess of allegories, parables and koans. Except for the bits about the Flood. And homosexuals. Those bits are absolutely literal.

Funny way for an omnipotent being to write a world history/rulebook/guide to life all the same.

Sure isn't all part of gods mysterious plan.

I think that was tge real genius - doesn't matter how sloppy, contradictory or plain wrong you are when giving us uour holy word as long as you have a plan to hide behind.

And sure if worst comes to worst, you can just get a Virgin up the duff and then sacrifice the poor sprog as a diversionary tactic!

Squeedily Spooch

floggg wrote: »

Sure isn't all part of gods mysterious plan.

I think that was tge real genius - doesn't matter how sloppy, contradictory or plain wrong you are when giving us uour holy word as long as you have a plan to hide behind.

And sure if worst comes to worst, you can just get a Virgin up the duff and then sacrifice the poor sprog as a diversionary tactic!

Ah the virgin birth, or how one woman's attempt to cover up a child born out of wedlock spiralled wildly out of control.

Skylinehead

Squeedily Spooch wrote: »

Ever see the Matrix sequels?

Yes.

Unfortunately.

J C

irish coldplayer wrote: »

Just for a laugh I'll hypothesize another way UPB could have been overcome (if it actually existed, which it doesn't) and the great thing is like your ID/creator theory, mine cannot be observably verified, so straight away my theory is at least as plausible as ID.
However unlike your ID theory mine will actually have a basis in science and string theory.

You are probably aware of the Multiverse theory put forward by scientists like Stephen Hawking, Steven Weinberg, Brian Greene, Max Tegmark, Alan Guth, Andrei Linde, Michio Kaku.
You've most likely heard of many of these guys before.
Well this theory postulates that there are an infinite number of universes in existence in addition to the one we experience. This would easily allow for the UPB bounds to be overcome as every possible combination happens at the same time an infinite number of times.

Prove me Wrong...

I am very much aware of the Multiverse Theory.
However, even if an infinite number of multiverses existed ... the inability of non-intelligently directed systems to locally (in both time and space) assemble systems with components with sequences that each occupy combinatorial spaces in excess of the UPB means that multiverse theory doesn't allow all possible things to happen (as is sometimes claimed).

There are also exponential 'run-away' issues where the more changes that are made to CFSI the worse the non-functionality becomes ... because of the great disparity in the ratio between the damaging non-functional sequences (equivalent to the UPB) and the functional sequences (which can be as little as one sequence, where it is a critical sequence for a particular function).
The putative organism must also survive when all of this is going on ... and because it only takes one critical system (or even part of a system) to be 'wrong' to kill something and literally thousands of systems must be 'right' to continue living ... the spontaneous production of CFSI would continue to be impossible, even if multiverses existed ... even an infinity of them.
This can best be summarised by the truism that an infinity of dead things will remain an infinity of dead things ... without an input of intelligence.

kingchess

And yet here we are:D. that link that was posted earlier -the physics of the universe-has a section called the "Beginnings of life"(I do not know how to link it here) that answers your question.Life started off basic and then became more complex.

SaveOurLyric

nozzferrahhtoo wrote: »

The reasons why otherwise educated and intelligent people think there is a god, or purport to even when they do not, are too numerous to mention in anything shorter than a book.

From a medical perspective can they be classed as delusional or even insane ? Or is it that a tendency to 'simple minded' religious belief is innate and natural, but which side of the fence people fall on is decided by the opposing forces of the strength of this natural tendency in an individual on the one side, and their intelligence, education, and sophistication of cultural environment. Some fall on the natural side despite the seeming strength of the force against it.