Banjo String wrote: » Apparently there is a meeting tonight in government buildings about Irish Water. Wonder what that could be about?
Banjo String wrote: » That's your prerogative. But, I think your using the term 'sponger' very loosely. It's been rumored (yeah, rumored so who knows) that the reason the deadline is being pushed back is apparently because only 80k packs have been filled in properly. If this is true (and I know it might not) the 'spongers' are most definitely in the majority, and the Govt are in serious difficulties. Be helpful if Irish Water would just come out and say either way.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » What union negotiated the bonuses for staff?
efb wrote: » Paid up tax payer not a sponger.
arse..biscuits wrote: » Gullible fool more like
dxhound2005 wrote: » A lot of slow learners out there. Believe all the nonsense about some mass campaign, don't apply, get charged more. Nonsense from the same quarters who said Don't Register, Don't Pay, it will go away. How did that work out?
darkpagandeath wrote: » Do you know something we don't ? The only recourse they have is taking a civil case to the courts. Enough don't pay or engage there will be serious problems, Courts could collapse under the weight of none payment cases. Some believe a few high profile cases will make people fall in line. I doubt it most people will wait to go to court and pay the fine. That's if it even gets that far. IW cannot dip directly into your wages. People are waking up to the fact that some of us from the start said this was a total sham jobs for the boys outfit.
hiFidelity wrote: » I will ask again, dxhound2005 why are you and Phoebas and the other two guys I mentioned policing this thread? It is unreal, I go back a couple of pages and there you are, I go back 3 or 4 weeks and there you are. Hope you dont mind me asking but what do you do for a day-job? This issue on boards seems to be an obsession with you, Phoebas, and those other two posters I mentioned. I mean what is the story? seriously
gladrags wrote: » Are there any protests in Sligo?
dxhound2005 wrote: » Heard it all before. Ask yourself why 80% plus pay the TV licence. I'll answer that. Because it is a long standing law, the worst sort of tax is a new tax. TV licence is easy to evade and apart from the usual spongers we now have a generation of Freemen deciding that it does not apply to them. T
EazyD wrote: » On the other hand you've been labelling the opposition as hardcore SF looneys. That's fairly pathetic no?
Streetwalker wrote: » The truth is people who oppose the water tax scam aren't supporters of any particular party or political movement at all. They are normal ordinary working people who refuse to be taken for fools anymore by those in power. The rate for returning the water documents seems to be in and around the 50% rate and if true Irish water is finished. Will it drag the government down with it is the only question remaining.
Infoanon wrote: » Expect a lot of IW announcements today btw
Infoanon wrote: » 33% return rate according to this mornings papers, how many of those dont include PPS numbers is another matter. Expect a lot of IW announcements today btw
Minjor wrote: » Indo is saying 500,000 have registered, but quite a few people saying it's a lot less than that.
DamagedTrax wrote: » 500,000 is 33% on 1.5 million households.
Minjor wrote: » I'm aware of that. And it may not be as high as 33 percent, those that have registered.
Andy From Sligo wrote: » ah yeah plenty - there was a bus from sligo up to Dublin last week to protest, and i think theres another one planned 1st nov
Denis O’Brien bought Siteserv for €45.4million in cash. Siteserv bought Sierra Communications. Sierra Communications, was chosen as the preferred bidder for a €50million, three-year Bord Gáis contract – to provide boiler installation and servicing services to Bord Gáis Bord Gáis has bid for and won the task of establishing Irish Water Denis O’Brien, who has a 29.9 per cent stake, is the biggest shareholder in the Independent News & Media................ the indo