munchkin_utd wrote: » nope, I'm simply saying that the money a venue makes on drink is massive. The wastage just means they are making an even tidier profit from drink sales. But the point in general is that sales of drink are so lucrative in the first place that theres little excuse to ride you on the food cost on top of it. If there was no culture of drinking loads, and/or drink was cheap, then you'd understand the crazy cost of the food. But the venues want to make insane cash on the food AND the drink. Mad stuff. Anyhow, despite the pair of us being irish and having a wedding in Ireland could be considered an option, we got married abroad. There was a number of factors, but the cost for a reception in Ireland with fairly mediocre food was definitely one of the main reasons.
clint_silver wrote: » what wastage? If someone doesnt finish their drink are you suggesting that the venue makes even more profit? That doesn't make sense.
clint_silver wrote: » what wastage? If someone doesnt finish their drink are you suggesting that the venue makes even more profit? That doesn't make sense. If venues make so much insane money, why are so many hotels in the country in receivership/nama/for sale?
wexie wrote: » But don't they collect all the leftovers and save them for the punch for the next wedding?
munchkin_utd wrote: » So for 3 pints bought, I'll drink 1 or 1 1/2 and dump the rest (and get a fresh one in an hour) So now the hotel has cash and profit for 3 pints, when I've only really wanted or needed the one
munchkin_utd wrote: » regarding wastage, that point is very simple - but maybe you arent a pint drinker so its an alien concept. If I have a half pint in front of me, then being a wedding and knowing half the people there someone buys me another, and before I move another person lands yet another pint in front of me, then I suddenly have 2 1/2 pints in front of me in various levels of coldness and freshness - which later in the evening when youre drinking slowly I'd never drink it before it goes flat or warm - so the first 1/2 pint, if not most of the second one, will not be drank. So for 3 pints bought, I'll drink 1 or 1 1/2 and dump the rest (and get a fresh one in an hour)So now the hotel has cash and profit for 3 pints, when I've only really wanted or needed the one
ahayes84 wrote: » But this isn't the hotel's fault. Instead if someone wants to buy you a pint say no as you have one already. This is what i do if i don't want a drink at that moment i say no thanks. The hotel still has to pay the drink suppliers for the wasted drinks
munchkin_utd wrote: » Nama is a property related issue. Many hotels were drawn into it thanks to bigger residental and commercial property issues that the hotel owners were dragged down by. Maldron is now running many of the Nama hotels and is doing a great job, and from personal experience with some hotels they are now a MUCH better place to stay in than at the height of the boom. regarding wastage, that point is very simple - but maybe you arent a pint drinker so its an alien concept. If I have a half pint in front of me, then being a wedding and knowing half the people there someone buys me another, and before I move another person lands yet another pint in front of me, then I suddenly have 2 1/2 pints in front of me in various levels of coldness and freshness - which later in the evening when youre drinking slowly I'd never drink it before it goes flat or warm - so the first 1/2 pint, if not most of the second one, will not be drank. So for 3 pints bought, I'll drink 1 or 1 1/2 and dump the rest (and get a fresh one in an hour) So now the hotel has cash and profit for 3 pints, when I've only really wanted or needed the one
munchkin_utd wrote: » a lot of folks missing the point here. What I'm simply pointing out is that they are doing well on having a room full of thirsty customers PLUS they have an added bonus that they then sell more drink than is needed or wanted due to the happy form of round buying uncles and the likes. So, essentially the drink side of the business at a wedding venue is a nice money spinner which means that they dont need to ride you on the cost of the actual meal. But still they do.
wexie wrote: » [SARCASM] But don't they collect all the leftovers and save them for the punch for the next wedding? [/SARCASM]
sweetie wrote: » i've heard they can put them back in the keg and send back to the brewery as a spoiled keg? When I worked in a bar many moons ago the owner would as us to keep the dead/abandoned pints for some reason and not tip them down the drain.
barneyrubble46 wrote: » church weddings are a total con and a total waste of time. Just go to a register office cheaper and the end result is the same. Then go have a big party somewhere totally cool. I did and I have been married over 27 years, my total budget was €450 and I had the time of my life.
Milly33 wrote: » No I don't think they put them back in the keg. It is more to track waste from what I know anywho, to see how much of the keg went down the drain.. The biggest burn I think is the whole wedding band. Heard someone mention they spent €3,000 again I just do not see why. Chatting to a few musicians at the weekend and they are all the same saying tis crazy what they are charging
xpletiv wrote: » The church we are getting married in only does Saturday ceremonies so we have to have it on a Saturday.
What I cant believe is the absolute greed of venues meaning a wedding costs MINIMUM 10000 euros.
Now, call me cynical, but are we in Ireland not still in recession!?
And most importantly, with the lovely new budget that just came out, new house buyers have to have 20% of their mortgage (thanks older generation!)
pwurple wrote: » I wouldn't run down a place that can turn around a good wedding at all. They are big undertakings.
Effects wrote: » Pick a different church or else don't get married in a church. You probably aren't a proper Christian so the church is just for show.
Saoirse Rough Menu wrote: » We got married in the carnegie court hotel in swords. Had the ceremony there with a solemniser. We had 66 for the meal and used the restaurant. The early bird gave us a choice of 5 dishes and 3 courses for €19 a head. People just ordered what they wanted and we had wine and soft drinks for those who wanted it. The tables were set out properly and everyone was happy. I think the bill came to about 1800. We know of numerous couples who have done the same since.The alternative was Turkey and ham or fish for 45 a head in the function room. We had a dj for the evening and food which went to waste as everyone was so full from dinner.
clint_silver wrote: » I cant resist. Why would you go to Turkey for ham or fish? Carnegie great spot for a wedding
Toots wrote: » Please don't make assumptions like this about the OP. You have no idea how religious or non religious they are.
xpletiv wrote: » I have been engaged for 6 months and have been looking around Ireland for a nice venue. The church we are getting married in only does Saturday ceremonies so we have to have it on a Saturday. What I cant believe is the absolute greed of venues; MOST cost about 100 euro a head, for basic enough package of canapes, 3 course and evening food and wine, but they also have insane minimum numbers of 100 people and sometimes more (140 ive found) meaning a wedding costs MINIMUM 10000 euros. Now, call me cynical, but are we in Ireland not still in recession!? Are people actually paying this crazy amounts?! And most importantly, with the lovely new budget that just came out, new house buyers have to have 20% of their mortgage (thanks older generation!) so I would now assume people are going to spend less on their wedding, yet we cant get past the minimum numbers part, and no where seems to be negotiable for price or numbers. Any tips? Also, to vendors out there that may read this, consider that the generation that is currently getting married is being destroyed by tax and costs as it is and now have to save 20% for houses. I really think the minimum numbers thing is a joke. Especially for the prices you are charging!
Effects wrote: » I'm not making assumptions. I'm basing it on the definition of a Christian from the bible.
Toots wrote: » Again, you have no idea whether or not the OP is a practicing catholic. Also, have a read of the forum charter, particularly the bits about 'Keeping It Civil' and arguing with moderators on thread.