G1032 wrote: » I have a new plan which is solid enough I think. Clyne -> Baines Sterling -> Tadic Ideally I'd not bring Tadic in but this will give me Southampton cover which seemingly everyone but me will have and I'll avoid taking a hit. I'll keep Welbeck and have 0.3 itb. Next week if there are no injuries etc I can do Fabianski to Forster if I want Southampton defensive cover back again. Any opinions on this?
evo2000 wrote: » more points?
FHFC wrote: » I wouldn't be gone on Baines. Can never get my head around tying up that much in defence and being heavily restricted on my big hitters elsewhere. This excellent post is causing me to reconsider for the first time.
Swiper the fox wrote: » Sure what would he be doing that for??
evo2000 wrote: » Get rid of hazard and get in fabregas,
jive wrote: » krul/foster baines/bertrand/moore/duff/chambers siggy/hazard/sterling/tadic/marney aguero/costa/welbeck 2FTs this week Any use using a transfer with that team? 0.4 itb, Sterling on thin ice - nice fixture coming up but he could be rested? Tempted to get Eriksen for him but Tottenham looking poor enough although they have 1 top 4 team in their next 9 game including Newcastle at home next
G1032 wrote: » Just read these figures below. Take three very popular premium midfielders, Silva, YaYa, Fabregas and their scores over the last 4 years. Silva (151, 147, 184, 144) -> average of 156.5 points YaYa (241, 142, 139, 146) -> average of 167 points Fabregas last 4 PL seasons (205, 108, 214, 128) -> 163.75 points and then look at Baines (169, 177, 134, 178) -> average 164.5. Yes, I've only picked three players but they are very much all a premium midfielder in FF terms and I haven't all night for further analysis...... Baines is basically a premium midfielder for 7.1m. Very difficult to argue against having him when looking at numbers like those above. My only decision now is who to get in for Sterling as I make room for Baines. It's either Tadic or Henderson. Might go for Tadic. Could get a price rise out of him and ship him off in 4 weeks time.
Lemlin wrote: » I'm not arguing about having him. I was making a point that I don't expect his price to rise rapidly due to his already quite high ownership, expensive price (for a defender) and the fact that alot of players performed well this week.
G1032 wrote: » Just read these figures below. Take three very popular premium midfielders, Silva, YaYa, Fabregas and their scores over the last 4 years. Silva (151, 147, 184, 144) -> average of 156.5 points YaYa (241, 142, 139, 146) -> average of 167 points Fabregas last 4 PL seasons (205, 108, 214, 128) -> 163.75 points and then look at Baines (169, 177, 134, 178) -> average 164.5. Yes, I've only picked three players but they are very much a premium midfielder in FF terms and I haven't all night for further analysis...... Baines is basically a premium midfielder for 7.1m. Very difficult to argue against having him when looking at numbers like those above.
Ziegler1988 wrote: » You could argue Cesc, Sterling, Siggy, ADM, Costa, and Aguero are also season keepers. So that leaves me with downgrading Welbeck to say Sakho or Berahino which I don't think is worth it. I'll just have to watch enviously for now
Lemlin wrote: » Will he rise much though? He's owned by 600k already so about 20% of people and is quite expensive. He's only the 7th most transferred in player today. Jagielka is ahead of him and has twice as many transfers in. I expect Tadic, Pelle and Aguero to see most of the transfer activity. I'd say a good few hits will be taken this week.
Swiper the fox wrote: » I have Baines now but for me a 7m defender at a mid table team will never be a season keeper, I'll take advantage of his nice run of fixtures but I know that as soon as I NEED money to make a pressing transfer he will be the one to get the bullet.
G1032 wrote: » Well Baines well probably be a season keeper and his price will rise a bit so might be best to get him in now
Ziegler1988 wrote: » I don't think I'll be bringing in Tadic, Pelle, or Baines either. Pretty happy with my template front 8 and don't see the need to chop and change after an 8-0 freak result and before Everton are back in Europa action.
manual_man wrote: » i havent done it myself. i can see the temptation with so many doing it, but that was a bit of a freak result yesterday, towards the end S'land capitulated completely and Tadic was the main beneficiary. before yesterday he hadn't scored more than 6 in any game. Stoke next wont be a walkover i think. then Hull away could be tricky. Leicester home there's definitely good potential there. But after that they've probably got the toughest run of any team in the league, all the way until the end of January, when fixtures become a lot more favourable. So no, i'm staying away from the Tadic/Pelle loveboat. i already did Fab and Moore to Chadli and Baines (yesterday) for budget reasons. getting rid of Fab risky i know, but he's probly over-performed slightly so far relative to his position, Chadli has been impressive so far and Spurs run nice for a good while now. Baines has just been on fire lately.
P.Walnuts wrote: » So the most pressing issue this week is whether to bow to the pressure and get in Southampton attacking cover...,. Pelle is the most obvious option, but Welbeck is easily the most cost efficient way into Arsenal's decent fixture list.....Aguero and Costa will permanent fixtures barring injury...so it is really down to Tadic. It will be an interesting week because on one hand Southampton do have some nice short term fixtures, but on the other hand sat could be a freak result. Sterling looking Liverpool's only bright spark makes the decision Swansea have a difficult 3 game run after next week, could be an option Siggy -> Tadic but then it could be a struggle to get him back in Decisions Decisions!
Ziegler1988 wrote: » Mata to Tadic and Falcao to Aguero seems more pressing
Lemlin wrote: » What's the rest of your team?
Lemlin wrote: » Pieters starts today. Luis will play max two games I reckon. Mourinho likes Azpi and Luis was poor for the Palace goal yesterday. He let Zaha skip past him.
KevIRL wrote: » I would think so, but Chelsea's fixtures not brilliant really
