Uncle Ruckus wrote: » Oh Lordy, the young of today sure have a mighty sense of Liberal self entitlement. Back in my day we just used our water to hose down hippies. First bath most of them ever had in their lives. Damn, ungrateful beatniks. You give them a free bath and they still want government hand outs...Lord have mercy...
Little CuChulainn wrote: » They will fix your first leak on your property for free. After that it's up to you. Why would you have thought they would be maintaining your pipes?
As far as I am concerned,the approved rate for the supply of domestic potable water INCLUDES any & all support and service work associated with it,other than any problems with the household plumbing itself which I fully accept as MY responsibility as it is now.
FREETV wrote: » You own the foothpaths in front of the houses. It is called frontage and even grass that is growing there beside the footpaths outside is the owners or tenants responsibility to mow it. It is your property that they are forcing installations of meters on without your permission and consent.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » They will fix your first leak on your property for free.
AlekSmart wrote: » The issue,or problem FREETV,is that is exactly what's NOT happening. The vast majority of installations are going ahead with little or no interest being shown by anybody,other than those householders lookin for an extra little bitta concrete here'n there . However,in the past 24 Hours comes yet another example that Irish Water,as currently structured,is nothing more than a shambles.... THAT would be my focus for protest,and I very much hope this latest revelation becomes centre-stage in PR terms,immediately !!!http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/irish-water-call-out-charge-plans-revealed-645848.html As a Citizen who had no real problem with complying with the return of the Irish Water form,today's news had decided me to do the opposite...I shall now wait and see....As far as I am concerned,the approved rate for the supply of domestic potable water INCLUDES any & all support and service work associated with it,other than any problems with the household plumbing itself which I fully accept as MY responsibility as it is now. This latest revelation is yet another reason for the removal of John Tierney AND most of the Phil Hogan appointees to IW's managerial structure. Irish Water,as currently structured,is significantly flawed and does NOT possess Management of sufficent proven competence and application to carry out their task. From what I can see the lowest level of Irish Water Labouers are FAR more adept at performing their jobs than those senior management benefiting from "Performance Related Bonus Payments".
FREETV wrote: » Many more blockades need to happen. You own the foothpaths in front of the houses. It is called frontage and even grass that is growing there beside the footpaths outside is the owners or tenants responsibility to mow it. It is your property that they are forcing installations of meters on without your permission and consent.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » The government will collapse and we'll be using "punt nua"(remember that, sure its stockpiled in the mint) by the start of 2013.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Gave me a great laugh thanks
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » The same buzzwords were trotted out when the LPT was announced :rolleyes:
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » More "election looming" posts? How many years have you been predicting this now?
Banjo String wrote: » When even the monsters creators are plotting against it, it's not looking too good.I don't understand how senior members of the government can change the CEO of a private company. I'm gonna guess that if things advance forward enough, whenever the mass non payment campaign kicks in, and Irish Water start threatening to reduce supplies to a trickle, the government will claim that they can not get involved because it's a 'private company'. (with a general election on the horizon)
Banjo String wrote: » When even the monsters creators are plotting against it, it's not looking too good. I don't understand how senior members of the government can change the CEO of a private company. I'm gonna guess that if things advance forward enough, whenever the mass non payment campaign kicks in, and Irish Water start threatening to reduce supplies to a trickle, the government will claim that they can not get involved because it's a 'private company'. (with a general election on the horizon)
Banjo String wrote: » I don't understand how senior members of the government can change the CEO of a private company. )
Fr. Ned wrote: » There was always going to be a point where we said enough is enough. We're a very passive, even docile, race of people.Breaking point has been reached.
renegademaster wrote: » it's gas how the diehrads here on boards are still debating the merits of protesting and the usual suspects are doing their best to delegitimise all protesting in Ireland, meanwhile our government are $hitting themselves and talking about firing the whole IW board, and probably more. they'd really want to be copping themselves on very lively because there's a rising tide of Irish protestors who are awake and active now
Deleted User wrote: » Jazus, lads. I go out for a day and come back and ye're STILL going over the same old ground! There were peaceful protests around the country yesterday. They are the right way to go about it. Not behaving like thugs, confronting Gardai and IW workers with silly, factually incorrect sh1te and making themselves look like right twats in the process. Compare the following:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=747387101963668&set=gm.1560582260841008&type=1&theaterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEhvP1cg6sw Which gets their message across the clearest?
Streetwalker wrote: » Those Garda looked fierce embarrassed as they should. They should be out fighting real crime.
FREETV wrote: » Many more blockades need to happen.You own the foothpaths in front of the houses. It is called frontage and even grass that is growing there beside the footpaths outside is the owners or tenants responsibility to mow it. It is your property that they are forcing installations of meters on without your permission and consent.
Paulownia wrote: » SF promise Utopia with scant reference to how it would be funded after they have rifled the pot!
Banjo String wrote: » When did public footpaths become private property?
Indeed. Touch of irony about this post. Any examples of protesters charged with acts of assault or criminal damage yet btw