Paully D wrote: » I'd be astonished if he's not. Poyet has probably been waiting for an excuse to give him some game time. If he doesn't start next week, he never will.
Shedite27 wrote: » Watching the Southampton/Sunderland game here, I reckon Pantmillion will be in goal next week - Manone was at fault for 4 of today's goals. Not that anyone is probably considering bringing in a Sunderland keeper today
evo2000 wrote: » Do you really think they pay him the ridiculous wages there paying him to have him as a back up striker?? falcao will be the main man an with the likes of di maria playin up to him he will score a alot,
Ace2007 wrote: » One more time, just because he's been a great striker at other teams, doesn't mean he will be at united, look at Torres for example at Chelsea. How much is Rooney on, or RVP? I had a quick search to see you team, and was only a few days ago you were talking about brining in Welbeck, despite you now claiming Aguero, Costa and Falcao are must haves, so kinda curious as to whom you had in mind to get rid of for welbeck...... Also whether or not Falcao scores tomorrow is irrelevant to your point that he is a must have. Falcao for example is not on Peno's - unlike Aguero, he hasn't completed 90 mins of football in the league.
Dearg81 wrote: » Falcao was the main man at his previous clubs. At United they have at least 3 other attackers who can chip in with goals. He's not central to their style of play play in the way Aguero, Costa, Pelle and even Welbeck are to their teams.
Ace2007 wrote: » "We will see" does not imply a player is a must atm, Falcao is not performing week in week out, I've watched nearly every united game, until his goal, he hit the bar once and didn't look like scoring in any united game. You talk about form saying he has 5,5,7 Sakho has 6,8,12 from last 3 games - go back further and you see he as 4 goals in last 4 games - much better form than Falcao, Dunno if you remember a guy called Torres, top top goalscore - went to Chelsea for 50m - and did Sweet FA, I'm not saving Falcao will be like that, but he has shown nothing at united so far and therefore is no where near a must have yet imo
evo2000 wrote: » he has not been playing bad an looks everybit a goal scorer makin the most out of half chances, after this week i bet most people will be on the falcao, bandwagon! when he hits form he ll hit he ll do damage and wont be long catchin up with the rest just watch!
evo2000 wrote: » We will see, players like aguero costa and falcao, will score regardless of the team there playing, then again im doin my own thing not copying "top players"
Mr.Prodston wrote: » Wow ditching Siggy is brave, even with impending fixtures. Also sound for the tenner I've got a version of the template power 7 and can hopefully eek a cleanie out of my weakening defence. The WC may stay intact for another week yet. My insatiable lust for chaos has been sated a little with today
FHFC wrote: » Thinkin Forster to Fabianski, Siggy to Tadic. I feel longer term Tadic may be the best Southampton attacking cover, esp given the good options up front from other teams, e.g. Welbeck, Cisse, Sahko. So many shiny things, tenner says Prodston plays the wildcard!
PARlance wrote: » I've just pulled the trigger on ADM -> Tadic So I've got the 2 of them now. Also have Sanchez & Welbeck so heavily reliant on the both teams but am happy to do so for the next 3 GW's before starting to move 1 or 2 out. Southampton: Stoke H, Hull A, Leicester H Arsenal: Sunderland A, Burnley H, Swansea A
FHFC wrote: » On general are many people considering going with both Pelle and Tadic?
extra gravy wrote: » The best forward line right now is Costa, Aguero and Pelle. Falcao has Chelsea, Arsenal and City in his next 5. If he scores well in those games, then he could be on his way to being a must have. Very few of the top ranking players have him and I wouldn't call them "foolish."
Liam O wrote: » Tadic has been playing very well for a lot of weeks and playing a very advanced role. Been in my team for a while now and done well enough. Annoyed in a way he had such a big week as he was a good potential differential player that wasn't overly popular and Southampton's current run is something I've been planning for for a couple of GWs now.
FHFC wrote: » Spot of advice appreciated. Have 2 fts this week and want tadic. I think him and pelle justified for next few weeks and both will be great for team value. But I went with double Saints defence on my wildcard which is looking like a good plan but one I may have to sacrifice. Forster, Hamer Clyne, Chambers, Moore, Duff, Hutton Template 4 + Boyd Aguero, Costa, Pelle. 1.7 in bank. Is clyne and Sterling to Tadic and Baines a good move. But. Of my back 5 Clyne is the one I'd rather keep. He's rising well. Good for attacking returns and I'd think he could outscore Forster in this favourable run of fixtures. So I could do Forster to Foster. Hutton to Baines and Sterling to Tadic for-4. Thoughts anyone? Or. Option 3 would be to let the Baines-wagon roll on and do Forster to another viable keeper and Siggy to Tadic. That should leave me flexible to do Sterling to Walcott if I look a bit further ahead....
Lemlin wrote: » I also remember you called dropping Hazard last year superbly. .
G1032 wrote: » So I still can't decide on whether to do Welbeck to Pelle so I'm going to sleep on it and if Pelle goes to 8.1 tonight then so be it. A huge amount of Tadic love here today. 3 assists and no bonus points in 7 games before today is all he got. 25 points in 7 games and 23 today. Granted his price will rocket but I think I'm going to stay clear and if I move for Southampton attacking coverage it'll be via Pelle.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/d9e9c6023fa9f32ea6583c87b5b1c6a5.svg)