Mars Bar wrote: » I finished "More Fool Me" by Stephen Fry last night. Quite disappointing. It starts by rehashing the previous two books and then a whole load of diary entries from the early 90's that show just how much cocaine and drinking he did in the Groucho and then it comes to an abrupt finish.
cloudatlas wrote: » Reading: At Home: A short history of private life by Bill Bryson. So far very interesting especially enjoying the historical origins of the names and phrases associated with domesticity.
Mam of 4 wrote: » Let me know how you get on with it, have read the first two and loved them, so am interested in hearing how this one reads before I buy it. Will probably wait til my brother buys it and borrow his
figges wrote: » The Goldfinch - Donna Tartt 500 pgs in (of 800 !) - v sadly losing the will to carry on with it - characterisation and story becoming a bit unbelievable - anyone advise as whether its worth carrying on ? Loved The Secret History - so long since I read that barely remember the storyline - but the amazing sense of getting drawn into a story so you almost feel part of it remains. For that I stuck 500 pgs of The Goldfinch - its been good in parts but ....
naughtb4 wrote: » Enjoyed it but not as much as the previous due mostly due toNot as interesting a time (Cold War vs WW2) The ridiculously flat portayal of some of the characters (women especially) Serious amount of repitition (was everyone a politician from 1900 to 1980) Still worth a read though
Strawberry Swan wrote: » I am currently reading Writing Movies for (Fun and) Profit. I have absolutely no intention of ever becoming a writer let alone a screenwriter but so far it's an insightful account into the machine that is Hollywood. A very enjoyable funny read.
david75 wrote: » Bringing down the house-Ben Mezrick How a group of students from MIT took Vegas for millions.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » Just started Life after Death by Damien Echols. It's about a former death row inmate. Some of you might of heard of the West Memphis three case in the 90s where three teenagers in Arkansas were convicted of a triple homicide on very flimsy grounds (no physical evidence at all)
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » I should have listened to the warning, awful self indulgent tripe. On further reading of the case I'm beginning to wonder were they innocent at all, I think I was heavily influenced by the biased Paradise Lost documentaries. I was shocked to learn what was left out of these films, the prosecution in reality actually had a strong case against them.
eisenberg1 wrote: » Mother of Jesus, talk about name dropping. I went to this school and that school, I went to this club and that, I know this famous person and that famous person. I know it only cost a couple of quid, but it bored the arse off me and I gave up half way thru............and I am a big fan of his.
Lenin Skynard wrote: » Sorry to go off topic, but any chance you could point me in the general direction of the information that was left out? Not challenging you on it or anything, just genuinely interested to have a look.
FreeFallin94 wrote: » 200 pages into The Cider House Rules by John Irving. Really enjoying it so far, and I have heard such amazing things about it.