LostArt wrote: » played v Soton but got injured and is out for months now afaik
Nerdlingr wrote: » Did he? Sh*t. Ditn realise he had returned..and got injured...again. Kaboul or Rose so maybe.
SlickRic wrote: » might have to move Krul on before the price fall.
Tim Krul is facing a race against time to be fit for Newcastle United’s crucial clash with Leicester City. The Magpies goalie withdrew from the Holland squad that lost 2-0 to Iceland this week in the Euro 2016 qualifiers. And as reported on Monday on Chroniclelive, Rob Elliot was standing by to take his place between the post against the newly promoted Foxes. After further assessment, and a scan on Tyneside, it has been revealed the elbow injury resulted in ligament damage. A club statement read: “Newcastle United can confirm that Tim Krul has returned from international duty after suffering an elbow injury. “The Dutch goalkeeper has now been assessed by the Magpies’ medical staff and underwent a scan on Monday.”
Lemlin wrote: » When's he due to drop? I've moved him on for Forster. This isn't going to help his cause:http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/newcastle-united-tim-krul-facing-7938585?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
larchielads wrote: » Deleted post
Swiper the fox wrote: » Grammar Nazi alert, can't help myself. Would it have killed you to put the h's at the end of the wits. Eriksen will destroy Chadli over the season but the price difference is considerable. Pottechino seems to drag Eriksen off early every week also for some bizarre reason. In short I'd prefer Eriksen. I'd have to (and I have) go for Wellbeck, it's just the Arsenal vs Southampton thing, and he has gotten off to a flyer with the Gunners.
Lemlin wrote: » In 4 games for Arsenal, Wellbeck has scored 2, 12, 2 and 1. 17 points. He's averaging 4 points a game. He has 1 goal, 1 assist and 1 x 3 bonus. Arsenal have scored 6 goals and he's been involved in 2 of them in 1 game. I wouldn't class that as "gotten off to a flyer with the Gunners" tbh. His CL hat trick has papered over the cracks but that doesn't really effect us on this forum. In that same period, Pelle has managed 13, 5, 9 and 2. 29 points. He has 3 goals, 1 assist and 2 x 3 bonus. Southampton have scored seven goals and he's been involved in 4 of them across 3 games. I went with Pelle as I feel he's the better striker, despite playing for a lesser team. I also think he'll be involved in more of the action at Saints than Wellbeck will be at Arsenal.
larchielads wrote: » Story wit chadli lads? Him or eriksen? Same wit pelle over welbeck what u lot reckon?
P.Walnuts wrote: » Have to take into account opposition if it is such a small sample size imo Pelle's last 4 games were Swansea, Newcastle, QPR and Spurs Welbeck had Man City, Villa, Spurs and Chelsea Big difference imo
Swiper the fox wrote: » Well we have a thread on this forum which is dedicated to these non pl games and I notice that you have 18 posts on it. I'm not sure how his CL hat trick is irrelevant, it's the sign of a player who is in form, isn't that what this forum is all about. Every Premier league game that ever was is history now, we either got the points or we didn't. Aren't we here to pick up more points in future. You can't ignore form wherever it comes, I won't even mention the difference in quality of opposition in the 4 game sample you provided.
Dearg81 wrote: » You cant just discount a hattrick cos it happened to be in a Champions league match. It may not get him any FPL points but it will have given him a lot more confidence which he'll take into PL games and shows what he can do when on form. I've seen most of his Arsenal matches though and I agree that he's hasnt really gotten off to a flyer. He's had 1 great game, 1 good game and a few average/poor ones.
km79 wrote: » I'm STILL debating whether to go the other way and bring in Pelle for wellbeck ! I'd captain Pelle this weekend not sure I will wellbeck...I'm also bringing in fortser or a saints defender though and their fixtures turn nasty in 5 game weeks so not sure I want to have to use 2 more transfers to get them back out.....
Swiper the fox wrote: » My apologies, I take back the statement that a player who scores 4 goals in his first 6 games for a new club in a fixture list that reads Man city, Dortmund, Aston Villa, Tottenham, Galatasaray (piss poor Turkish outfit) and Chelsea could be considered to have gotten off to a flyer. At the time it seemed a fairly innocuous statement, I'll put more thought into my future posts.
RossieMan wrote: » Its a typical person looking at stats and thinking a player has played well. Watching Welbeck is another thing, hes been better than at United for sure, but still think Pelle or even Ulloa are better options.
Lemlin wrote: » I certainly wouldn't take Wellbeck out if I had him. I hope Hull are tighter at the back but they may not be. Saints play Sunderland who have been fairly miserly at the back themselves.
km79 wrote: » is he captain material this weekend ? other strikers are falcao costa
Iused2likebusts wrote: » I have Pellè and will keep him for the next two weeks but if I was on wildcard I'd go with wellbeck over Pellè and get tadic in as saints cover.
km79 wrote: » who would ya lose though from fabregas di maria sterling and siggy........I know sterling is "tired" and has Madrid on the horizon but QPR and then hull.....
Mr.Prodston wrote: » Why do you say these things? I thought I was nearly finished with self doubt for one week :pac: