Toyotafanboi wrote: » Great to see it on the road :-)
MetzgerMeister wrote: » ...for now :pac:
toastedpickles wrote: » In fairness its more solid looking than most of them
MetzgerMeister wrote: » Yeah, the Titanic was incredibly solid looking when it left Belfast and look what happened that :P
Slicemeister wrote: » That 166 looks like it's ready to cry.
Ded_Zebra wrote: » Thanks
Ded_Zebra wrote: » Here's the new motor :cool::cool: Wonder if anyone recognizes it……
jprboy wrote: » Nice, well wear. One suggestion: put the disk holders on the vertical, better visually that way IMO (this applies to all cars).
Ded_Zebra wrote: » Thanks You mean swap it to be horizontal? Yeah I agree, they look better the "normal" way.
Frankly my dear wrote: » Loved alpha's when I was a young 'un, nice DZ
bear1 wrote: » Still trying to figure out how to remove that piece of metal in the interior shot
Interslice wrote: » 9 inch grinder :pac:. Looks like you'l have to take the radio out. Nice motor. 2.2 diesel?
bear1 wrote: » The seller said the previous owner had a handsfree installed and that that is the remnants of it. So I'm thinking of either leaving it and maybe buy a phone holder or destroy the car so I can get rid of it Yep the 2.2, 117k on it and no signs of chain or manifold problems (yet) only issue for now is the EML coming on at certain times. Keep forgetting to get the codes read.
Hachiko wrote: » Them 2.2 Accords can be troublesome, the 2.4 petrols were very good themselves but tax on them in Ireland like everything over a 1.8 is nuts.
Hachiko wrote: » the 2.4 petrol is not as bad for economy as people make out, its more frugal than a 1.8 mondeo. on the other hand running costs between that and a S class are worlds apart. Has your Honda a documented service history?, i believe they are fickle on bosch filters etc. Speaking of economy i can get well over 400 miles on normal driving and onto 500miles on a full tank on my 2.5 lexus on long runs, people need to banish the notion that any car over a 1.8 is a gas guzzler.!
bear1 wrote: » Males was it?
bear1 wrote: » Way to kill my buzz It doesn't have a documentated service history no but I'll be doing a full service on it next week so at least I know genuine oil and filters have been used. My point about the S Class was that if I could afford to drive around in a 2.4 petrol car then I may as well go for a 2.8 or 3.2 S Class. In other words if I ever go back to petrol then it would be a nice big engine.
Hachiko wrote: » i dont think you appreciate the running costs of an S class, I could probably afford an older one, would i buy it...? nope. back to the honda, they are good cars but just giving you a heads up, if they go wrong they can cost you. best to take to a decent garage who knows his stuff.