masculinist wrote: » You have no valid counter argument. You are grasping at straws now. You oppose democracy if you support forcing water charges upon the population. That is a simple fact.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » It's possible. It would help save Labor seats imo. But the Labor leaders are probably betting on a recovery before the next general election.
KERSPLAT! wrote: » The government implementing these charges were democratically elected into the government, by the people.
awec wrote: » The people outside the GPO on Saturday don't represent the public so there is no way you can make that assertion. They are not elected - they represent nobody but themselves. There are probably others who are against the charges, and many more who are ambivalent. I doubt there is anyone actively for them - nobody wants another bill but some people can see the reason behind it. There's no point sitting here pretending that Saturday is proof that the public have had enough.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » For it to be a fact you would first have to prove undeniably the majority oppose water charges.
masculinist wrote: » That's a Republic , not a democracy . The purest form of democracy is when you look to how many people oppose this . The reality is an overwhelming majority oppose water charges. Nobody can sell this as a popular move. If someone supports the forced imposition of water charges then he cannot call himself a democrat. [by the way , democracy sometimes gets jammed and twisted by those in power. Hitler was democratically elected as a rather infamous example.]
Banjo String wrote: » The only way to do that irrefutably, would be via a referendum.
Sir Arthur Daley wrote: » What with all the youtube videos.
awec wrote: » The people outside the GPO on Saturday don't represent the public so there is no way you can make that assertion. They are not elected - they represent nobody but themselves. There are probably others who are against the charges, and many more who are ambivalent. I doubt there is anyone actively for them - nobody wants another bill but some people can see the reason behind it. There's no point sitting here pretending that Saturday is proof that the public have enough.
Highflyer13 wrote: » I fully expect these clowns to throw some sweeteners at us tomorrow. Sorry lads but its too little to late.I for one won't be buying it. The beast has awoken and the resilient Irish are rising up. On a side note it shows how out of touch Labour are when they send one of their consistently weakest performers Lorraine Higgins onto Vin B. Obviously she is still rated within the party somehow.
gladrags wrote: » The marchers are representative of the public. Just as,for example,the silent majority or minority,are representative of the public. It is clear that a large section of the public represent the view that the w charges,should be scrapped. There was no vote to apply w charges,so democratically (as a poster just pointed out) it’s undemocratic,and divisive.
bubblypop wrote: » OK so I haven't read all of this thread, its just too big!! I Apologise, seriously. I have a question though, is it true that there is only one allowance for one adult per household? I have four adults in my house, is it true I will only receive one allowance for me? Nothing for the other adults? For what its worth, I haven't sent back my form yet, I have a serious problem with these people getting my info. Where from? How dare some other company give them my info, and I'll be f##ked if I send them my pps so they can sell it on ( which I reckon they will!!)
masculinist wrote: » I'd like to see who turns up if ''The Occupant'' gets summoned to court. Over a million of us This is one unpopular move which will never be accepted by the Irish people.I hear them extremely angry about this everywhere I go.
Grandpa Hassan wrote: » Except that tenants opposed to the charge will find themselves in a difficult position when their LL makes registering for the charge a condition of the lease. I want no come back on to me, so have already included that clause in leases that my tenants have signed. And will be checking to ensure they've registered. That is going to force a certain level of compliance by tenants I think
dxhound2005 wrote: » That started off OK but it went a bit weird at the end.
FREETV wrote: » The question is are you all going to let these liars in suits who live like Royalty compared to the common man and woman on the street dictate to you against your will? Over one hundred thousand protested in Dublin alone last Saturday and still they try to enforce this immoral and unethical Tax on people and ignore the vast majority of Irish People's voices who are vehemently against water charges in order to follow the wishes of The Troika and Nazi's controlling the EU. Yes, they have infiltrated the EU. I thought that this Country was supposed to be for and about we the People? Show them who's Boss, vote them out of power and never vote again for those Parties or Fianna Fail or you will get more of the same. By the way Hitler didn't commit suicide either, he used many doubles, he and Eva Braun fled to Argentina, many Nazi Scientists joined/formed NASA. The F.B.I know this, they have files regarding this so go read them. RTE News and Current Affairs Programmes are all screened by the Irish Government so don't fall for all of their crap also please. We are living in Tyranny and not a Democracy!
MadYaker wrote: » When was the last time you went outside?