SaveOurLyric wrote: » Yes, yes, yes, but, but, but, but, PPS numbers, some guy from Sligo CoCo, bankers, Phil Hogan, double taxation, water is a human right according to the UN, leaks, consultants fees, protest, all politicians are just in it for themselves, bad water quality, quango, I didnt ask to be a customer, unconstitutional, Troika, Sinn Fein, cut off, austerity, march, allowance, to the pin of our collar, jobs for the boys, where did they get my details, Edna Kenny, Aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh.
VinLieger wrote: » In a poll last week irish people unanimously voted we want more money back in our pockets than in services proving we are really just a bunch of greedy cvnt's who only care for number 1 and irish society is really just selfishly broken
Banjo String wrote: » RTÉ now acknowledge 100k attended the protest. (Miriam referenced the numbers numerous times) Eamon Ryan acknowledges 'we're already paying for water through vat' Pudie acknowledged there's basically Shag all Irish Water can do to none payers. That most definitely didn't go well for the pro side, fairplay to Ruth Coppinger. Tied them in knots, had paudi basically pleading with the public to pay.
smash wrote: » If your engine blew up and your mechanic had the car for a few weeks while you paid him and you got it back with new brakes and tyres would you just accept it? The bottom line is that you paid for a specific service so you expect to get it!
VinLieger wrote: » Yes put it on the long finger and make it someone else's problem, which will be our children, the classic irish politics answer.
smash wrote: » There comes a point when enough is enough. 6 years of crap and people want something back.
VinLieger wrote: » And we weren't getting that service okay? You can cry and complain all you want but it won't change that fact. What do you want? all the money you paid over the years back?
RobertKK wrote: » They can go through the courts to get the money they are owed. A special court should be set up to fast track non payers of utility bills.
smash wrote: » No, continue as we are and allocate the money we currently pay for water to actually fix the water system.
Banjo String wrote: » Promissory notes anyone?
VinLieger wrote: » Fool me once......
smash wrote: » Charge you twice... For the rest of your life... ?
gladrags wrote: » I wonder will Vinno have a go on TV3.
VinLieger wrote: » You weren't paying for water, money you paid income tax or VAT that happened to be used for maintaining our water now it's going somewhere else, you might get a bit back this year probably more next year, things will improve.
VinLieger wrote: » You weren't paying for water,
Banjo String wrote: » 100k were at the protest, many more against the charges weren't for various reasons. The hhc seen 480k non payers, so suffice to say, without Revenue threats we can more than likely assume these same numbers will refuse to pay this. Even fast-tracking people through a court would still coincide with any upcoming general election, FG sure as hell don't need that bad publicity.
RobertKK wrote: » It will be funny if people didn't pay their water bills and it ended up with Irish water not receiving enough money to pay to keep the workers paid and the water service going and the water just stopped...it would be a case of you get what you paid for. It would be a bit like receiving certain vaccines, enough of the people have to receive the vaccine for it to work, but when enough don't it puts all at risk.
RobertKK wrote: » Threats of court action will frighten a lot.