ABC101 wrote: » I may be wrong,, but I think you can fit a stove up to but not greater than 5Kw into a room which does not have a external vent. Once you go above this threshold you either require a vent, or you must put in an external air supply source. Otherwise the stove will not work correctly ( due to lack of air / draught) and you run the risk of CO getting into the room. The info you supplied seems a bit contradictory, if the apartment is 10 years old it should be well insulated to a high standard anyway. So why put in a stove? You will have to put in a Stainless steel liner for the flue. Will the fitters be able to gain access to the roof? I mean how high is the building? Two floors, four floors, six floors? Apartments generally do not have much storage space, so where are you going to keep de fuel? Then you have to dispose of hot ash? It all depends on your set up, but in general the majority of apartments would not be suitable for a multifuel stoves. I love stoves, I think they are great! But the govt are taxing fuel more and more every year, I think given the hassle with bunkering coal, disposable of ash etc the advantages over a gas boiler are narrowing. SEAI have a good spreadsheet updated every 3 months giving cost comparisons of fuels, coal is the cheapest, but gas is not far behind.
Robbie.G wrote: » A stove must have a permanent air supply for combustion.If you have a stove with external air supply you do not need a vent in the room for the stove
rarnes1 wrote: » How long approx for the chemically type smell (curing smell) to go from lit fires?
HeidiHeidi wrote: » I had it for about four or five fires. Gave me shocking headaches, had to leave patio doors and room windows open, and the smoke alarm kept going off. Then suddenly one evening it was no more.
pcasso wrote: » Thanks for your reply. Much appreciated. We will get a stove fitted that has an external air supply fitted. The apartment is new to us but we have been told by neighbours that they are in fact very cold and the engineers report stated that the attic space above our apartment is poorly insulated. There is a gas fire in situ at present but we reckon that it wouldn't be safe to use without a vent. To be honest the installation of a wood burning stove is an aesthetic as much as a practical choice. The apartment has a balcony which has some storage space for fuel and would allow us to safely store hot ashes until disposal. Thanks again for all your feed back and feel free to comment on what I have posted.:)
ABC101 wrote: » You need to find out what type of gas fire is fitted. I don't know everything about gas fires, but here is what I do know. 1). Gas fire fitted into the conventional fire place, this is a fire place which used to have a traditional coal / wood burning fire with a normal chimney, but now has a gas burning coal effect fire fitted. 2). Gas hot box, this is a gas burning hot box, with coal effect imitation coals, but it is NOT the same as a normal fireplace, it does not have a high temperature flue, just a spiral wound aluminium uptake vent which goes up to the roof. It is not designed for high temperatures or sooty creosote carbon fuels. 3) Gas imitation fire with catalytic converter, this has no flue at all, no chimney on the roof. This is not suitable for retrofitting of a wood burning or multifuel stove of any type. I would imagine that given your apt is 10 years old, it would be very unusual that you have a traditional flue / chimney. I could be wrong! If you want to keep a place warm, the first and most important step is insulation. After that comes heat source, whether it be solar, stoves or gas / oil boilers etc. If you have a suitable chimney, you need to calculate how often you are going to light the stove, and how many KG of coal you are going to burn a day, because are you really going to hump up 40Kg a week to your coal bunker on de balcony. Believe me you will soon be asking yourself is it really worth all this hassle.
Sanchez83 wrote: » Again to reiterate a point I've made before if it's not a branded stove it is not worth taking the chance.Would you drive a non branded car? Ok the guys you have no connection to are great by all accounts... That doesn't take away the reality that you are getting a stove which has no brand,possibly no genuine certification and in years to come may not be able to get parts for. By the way,that website has no address for that company or landline.....only an email and mobile number.
elastico wrote: » Big difference in a stove for €250 and a car for €25000 though. A stove just sits there in the corner and there isn't a huge amount that can go wrong with them. Whats the point in paying hundreds extra to a shop for something that's called for example Henley or Hamco when its probably imported from China at similar unit cost on day one?
Sanchez83 wrote: » Where do I start re non branded stoves. A poorly built stove with no quality control could emit carbon monoxide and kill you.So comparing cost of stove versus car has no baring as it was safety I was highlighting. This poorly built stove is being ordered via email online,has fake certification and because the Chinese are selling it to a nobody they are normally rejects from big clients who do quality control and refuse them. The importance of having a brand is knowing they are genuinely certified and SAFE.Brands will have vigorous quality control checks and more importantly will be there in ten years time if you need them. That's why you would pay a few hundred euros more,safety and peace of mind.
rarnes1 wrote: » How long is the warranty with the cheaper stoves? Inis stoves all come with a 5 year warranty afaik
Sanchez83 wrote: » .
elastico wrote: » You are grasping at straws a bit suggesting that having a landline makes a business more credible in the age of the internet and mobile phones. Also the stovedeals.ie website is around a few years now so its more than a popup website at this stage.
elastico wrote: » Anyway theres no point arguing over this all night, I have one of the cheap stoves and it works fine, and I know a few others who have them and they are equally happy, each to their own and all that!
macjohn wrote: » Because its so easy set you a website general consumer protection suggests landline and address etc, --> a general point not directed at any company. Not grasping at straws rather making point of what normal companies do and are expected to do.
elastico wrote: » I know we are going off topic a bit but that's absolute rubbish about what companies are expected to do Re. having a landline. Where is this outlined in general consumer protection that you should have a landline. Link please. We don't expect to phone Ryanair to book a flight for example. If a company chooses to go the online route, regardless of what their line of business is, that's their business strategy and we all know its cheaper to buy a plane ticket online than to go into a travel agent and pay for a ticket where staff have to manually take and process your order.