pedro1234 wrote: » Picture of two cupcakes on a plate with the following: "thanks 4 de bunz maura xxxx" The mentality of it. Oh cheers for the gift, I'll just take a picture and put that on Facebook and thank you there, hopefully I'll get a few likes out of it.
thesandeman wrote: » Please nobody quote that.
BaZmO* wrote: » I don't see the problem with that, sure isn't that the point of Facebook? And what's the difference in you posting a snidey comment about it on here hoping for a few likes?
pedro1234 wrote: » 2. The difference is I'm not posting anything for likes. I'm posting about retards on Facebook which is what this thread is for.
RainyDay wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04Ser5wmPSA
pedro1234 wrote: » Hahaha. Go away. N-Word, R-Word, F-Bomb. I completely against banning words. By saying R-Word you're forcing the people listening to you to say retard in their head. That's a mean thing to do. I don't refer to people with mental or physical disabilities as retards, so I have no problem calling someone who I think is an idiot a retard. It's the same, to me, as calling someone slow. The origin of the word (re is back and tardus is slow) contains it's true meaning. Retarded means very foolish, slow, or stupid. If you wish to retard something, you wish to stop it or slow down it's growth. When some bigot starts using a word to belittle a group of people, I refuse to let the bigot own that word. It was our word before they started using it. Feck them! Read this: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2006/12/eschew_the_taboo.html
spitfireIRL wrote: » Lads would you please stop. This is a great thread don't be ruining it!
RainyDay wrote: » So just curious - how often do you use N-I-G-G-E-R, P-A-K-I or F-A-G-G-O-T in polite conversation with workmates or family?
Hatred will always find a way, and will certainly always be able to outpace linguistic correctness.
Simona1986 wrote: » Hello there....... Just a few words if that is okay... Thank you for your time
LizT wrote: » Mod Can we please get back on topic?
Unknown Soldier wrote: » As a non fbibook user, why do people stay "friends" with these people? This, I do not understand. Don't want to hurt their feelings?
Mahogany wrote: » "Is Wales a part o England or waaa" I **** you not.
El Diablo Blanco wrote: » "WHAT SICK BASTARDS GET A THRILL OUT OF STEALING DOGS AND KILLING THEM TO MAJE FOOD IM SORRY BUT DOGS ARE FAMILY PETS THEY ARE MEANT TO BE LOOKED AFTER NOT COOKED AND PUT IN A FCKIN STEW OR WHATEVER. BUT LET ME TELL YOU ALL SOMETHING IF U EVER TRY AND STEAL MY DOGS I WILL CATCH YOU BEFORE YOU LEAVE MY HOUSE AND KICK UR SKULL IN TILL UR DEAD AND MAKE YOU INTO FOOD. CAPUCHE!!"
pedro1234 wrote: » Rarely. If i'm speaking about Nigger Jim from Tom Sawyer, then I'll say Nigger Jim. I'm sure the last time I used that particular word was to say "Did you know they say nigger over one hundred times in 12 Years a Slave?". The article I linked talks about using niggardly, a common word to describe someone who is tight with their money, and how there's a stigma around using this word because it sounds like nigger. This is ridiculous. Faggot is a derogatory term for homosexuals. I'm not prejudice against homosexuals so I wouldn't call a homosexual a faggot, but I have no problems using the word appropriately as I am doing so now. The same goes for Paki. Fagot on the other hand, is a bundle of sticks. I'm surprised you made that blunder. Two g's is a derogatory term, one g is the innocent bundle of sticks which is rarely used nowadays. I think you've missed the crux of my point of view here. Did you even bother to read the article? The last sentence is key:
