"I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale,"
cdoherty86 wrote: » Darwin once said.
smcgiff wrote: » And?
cdoherty86 wrote: » Bears mutating into whales? Did Darwin ever explain why earthworms compost? I mean, why do they do it? People just wonder about the origin of our species, the universe and they cling on to these dogmatic beliefs. Bible, Torah, Quran, Darwin, it's all the same BS to me. Nobody knows why an earthworm composts, it just does.
lanomist wrote: » just a question, If Darwins theory on evolution, that humankind evolved from apes, why are there still apes out there ?
cdoherty86 wrote: » Bears mutating into whales?
cdoherty86 wrote: » I mean, why do they do it?
OSI wrote: » Because they eat food and then **** it out the other end?
cdoherty86 wrote: » Naturally, this is all just done randomly.
smcgiff wrote: » Do what? Why do they breakdown organic matter - it's part of their digestive system. You might as well ask why do horses turn grass into manure (also good as compost)?
cdoherty86 wrote: » The horses mightn't have grass to eat were it not for earthworms, water and oxygen so obviously there's an interdependence on all the organisms and plants, animals that exist. It doesn't strike me as a random arrangement. I'm not religious, but I just don't entirely agree with these atheistic dogmatic beliefs about the origin of universe and everything in it. That it was all just random and evolved without any direction. So, burn me at the stake.
cdoherty86 wrote: » Charles Darwin referred to earthworms as ‘nature’s ploughs’ because of their importance in mixing soil and organic matter, providing nutrients which other plants depend on. Naturally, this is all just done randomly.
cdoherty86 wrote: » there's an interdependence on all the organisms and plants, animals that exist.
KomradeBishop wrote: » Taking this thread to its logically-absurd conclusion: If all creatures have a common ancestor, why is there anything other than humans?
Defender OF Faith wrote: » From a purely Darwinian standpoint though, homosexuality is self-evidently a disorder I dont know how the LGBT community would react to that though
folan wrote: » ok, so you really don't understand evolution. it is a heavily interesting and complex field, which you would find very interesting.
b318isp wrote: » I call troll here. It's 2014 FFS.
smcgiff wrote: » They would most likely react by pointing out the theory that there are benefits in having close family non breeding individuals when rearing offspring.
cdoherty86 wrote: » No, I'm simply stating that everything is interdependent
cdoherty86 wrote: » and must have some intelligent thinking behind it. I believe there was direction, it didn't all occur randomly.
GreeBo wrote: » Taking homosexuality as a persistent, pervasive trait means no offspring though.