MRnotlob606 wrote: » it's not old fashioned, its courtesy.
Wellyd wrote: » I had this conversation recently with someone who said they'd be insulted if their husband to be asked her dad for his permission to marry her. Honestly I'd be very disappointed in my boyfriend if he didn't ask my dad.
lazygal wrote: » My husband didn't ask and I wouldn't have liked it. I was a grown woman and didn't need my father's approval to marry.
foreverandever wrote: » I disagree, I think it is just showing respect to your OH father, it's not about asking permission but only if you have a good relationship with your father. People saying it's treating the woman like property or it's their relationship- that's not what it's about at all and pretty silly if you think that. I agree with the poster above who said sometimes the wedding is all about the bride and her mother and this can be a way to include father of the groom- hadn't thought of that before
cletus van damme wrote: » I would ask her dad's permission. It's a respect thing. I don't get people getting upset saying it turns the girl into property. It doesn't, it's asking for her father blessing. The blessing of the man who reared her, cared and looked after her. Some posters seem to think once the father approves it's a done deal. As far as I know (in Ireland) the lady still gets to say aye or nay. So i don't get the' property' jibes Yeah sure it's a little traditional and some people loves to piss on tradition and find some level of insult in it. But there is none here.
dede12 wrote: » I wouldn't want a guy to ask my father first at all. I think my da would like it because he is rather the old fashioned, strict, & protective type but I'd find it quite disrespectful, as if I was some sort of property who couldn't make up my own mind on it. The way I see it, if I'm agreeing to marry somebody it's between the two of us, not the business of my parents until we tell them. While I don't have problem w/ most wedding traditions like the father walking the bride down the aisle, the asking for permission or blessing just really strikes me a blatantly old fashioned & sexist. After all, I'm not gonna be there asking his mam for permission to marry her son before saying yes! If parents having input is important to the couple, a much better way to go about it imo would be for the couple to go both of the parents together, announce they'd like to get engaged & ask for their blessing as a couple. That way the parents are appeased because they've been given special consideration yet makes it clear that it is the couples decision & that they don't need parental permission to get married.
Wompa1 wrote: » You get that it's just a formality...the guy asks for the fathers approval...he still does what he wants even if he doesn't get it.
Shenshen wrote: » Not because of that one act, but becasue the act would have communicated to me that he regards me as another man's property that he wishes to acquire. I would not want to marry a man like that.
Shenshen wrote: » Sorry, as a female I would find it highly insulting.
psinno wrote: » Except it would literally have been for one act. If one symbolic act changes a relationship that much then I don't think it can be that solid to begin with.
newport2 wrote: » If he said no, what guy is really going to back off and not propose anyway? It's not asking permission, it's just a tradition.
psinno wrote: » I think it matches up quite well with the tradition of the father of the bride paying for the wedding. That one seems well past its sell buy date. Do peoples parents still pay for their weddings?
Gongoozler wrote: » This is what I would have thought previously. Every relationship is different, and depending on your wife and her family, it can be a really nice respectful thing to do. Even though most women probably wouldn't like the idea, some would know that their father is traditional in that way, and would appreciate appeasing him. It's not always about you! And I'd you're getting married your partner should know you well enough to know which is you.
Shakespeare's Sister wrote: » It's a silly tradition IMO - particularly when they're going to get married anyway. And I agree, why not ask her mother too? It's true also that it's not required to ask him for permission for anything else with her (which could be all sorts ) so why suddenly when marrying her? That said, even though I think it's pointless, I think saying "I'd say no to him if he did that" is going too far IMO. It's meant as a nice gesture, it's not really viewing her as the tradition originally did (which was pretty chauvinistic).
newport2 wrote: » I agree. But engagement rings evolved as a level of insurance to the woman, because: "If the groom-to-be walked out after he and the bride-to-be had sex, that left her in a precarious position. From a social angle, she had been permanently "damaged." From an economic angle, she had lost her market value." (http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/04/the-strange-and-formerly-sexist-economics-of-engagement-rings/255434/) Pretty chauvinistic tradition too. No objections to engagement rings though.