eeepaulo wrote: » Im getting the idea that water meterers (meterists) are going to start going missing in the back of beyong where fr. ned lives.
BarryD wrote: » A thought though - what if they replace the mains some day.. you'll be snookered then!
animaal wrote: This government has already made it clear that people's pension savings are subject to confiscation.
Fr. Ned wrote: » Na, they can come along if they like. Trouble will come if they try to enter onto my property. I know my rights when it comes to trespass.
Phoebas wrote: » Ah ye see, plan B is to install a secret network of pipes bringing salt water from the Atlantic with a private desalinisation plant on site. There's no way those bastards in IW are getting money out of Ned.
eeepaulo wrote: » A porch, a rocking chair, a piece of grass, a shotgun?
Satriale wrote: edit btw ive no doubt some protestors are just as thuggish as some of the government, both elements need to be rooted out (and we cant send them all to Bruxelles ;0) )
Recondite49 wrote: » That's not quite what I meant. If taxes were raised to pay for water for everyone (which I would support) it's possible to increase your pension contributions to reduce your taxable income.
arse..biscuits wrote: » LOL at all these "hard men"? Go fill out your form and start paying for your water again, well done.
animaal wrote: » Fair enough. As you pointed out, you pay income tax once you start to draw down the pension. But also, there's the "pension levy", which is used to confiscate a portion of your pension savings every year. I.e. if you've already saved €100k in a fund (which is only enough to provide you with an annual income of about €4k!!), you'll pay a levy of €750 this year. That's likely to be more than the water charge (although IW won't yet tell us how much that will be). I'm surprised there hasn't been more of a fuss about the pension levy. It's outright theft from a section of the population that's trying to provide for their own future, but designed so as not to apply to politicians.
Curly Judge wrote: » Interesting post! Can you provide any link proving the the politicians have managed to exempt themselves?
mrsbyrne wrote: » Wether you fill up the form or not your going to be paying for your water. If you don't fill it up you will just be paying more then you needed to.
Banjo String wrote: » This is why they imposed water charges.http://m.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/revealed-the-troika-threats-to-bankrupt-ireland-30621197.html Resistance is your duty.
Banjo String wrote: » http://m.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/revealed-the-troika-threats-to-bankrupt-ireland-30621197.html
suicide_circus wrote: » The fall guys of Europe. Sickening.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Our duty now is it? What about everyone should decide for themselves as you very reasonably stated yesterday?My personal stance, (and I say this as a parent of two kids under 5) I am refusing to engage with Irish Water. I'll not be filling in their contract, I'll not be paying a bill. I have not, nor will not advocate anyone to do likewise Fwiw. Everyone has their own decision to make on this
dxhound2005 wrote: » Get well soon.
Missyelliot2 wrote: » I agree, as am sure do so others here. But, people here are not apathetic - but we seem to be accepting of all the rubbish thrown in our direction. I am not a supporter of any party -(they all seem up their own!), but I did feel there was an air of change 'promised' - we're now delighted that through austerity -we're the best, most-obedient, well-behaved country in Europe! Well yippee for us - we must have the ****tiest hospital care ever! Rant over .....I will pay for my water - I will not hand over my PPS number to 'Irish Water' .............so will I be sued/fined?
Einhard wrote: » Oh FFS, even without the bailout of the banks we were still spending billions of euro more every year than we brought in in taxes. That's the reality, no matter how people want to dress it up. Even if we had refused to pay a single cent to the banks and others, e'd still need the water charges and the property tax.
p_o_s_t_y wrote: » I too won't be paying,there is a massive opposition to this double tax,I live in Ferrybank in Waterford and we have stopped the Irish Water gangsters from putting meters in,the media are not broadcasting any of this as they are owned by the big wigs,opposition is widespread across the country,stick together and oppose this so called taxhttps://m.facebook.com/WatermeteringIrelandLetsfightback/posts/275307282657994
Curly Judge wrote: » The people who adopted this stance on the LPT and the second homes tax have just ended up paying more in the end. My take on it is that if you are receiving a service you should pay for it. As it stands small businesses are being crippled doing all the heavy lifting on their own. All thanks to "Honest Jack" Lynch and that unforgivable muttoner Martin O'Donoghue
Banjo String wrote: » Here you go. Btw. That's not what was asked of me earlier by seamus.https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10203137401698805&set=vb.1319915454&type=2&theater