tolerant from cork wrote: » Yes I will givout to anyone and about anyone accusing someone with untrue stories.
tolerant from cork wrote: » That is not being dishonest.
tolerant from cork wrote: » I didn't accuse anyone.
tolerant from cork wrote: » And again you are not an appointed body or organisation to see any evidence containing personal details. Therefore you won't see it as it would be against regulations.
tolerant from cork wrote: » Yes I will givout to anyone and about anyone accusing someone with untrue stories. That is not being dishonest. I didn't accuse anyone. And again you are not an appointed body or organisation to see any evidence containing personal details. Therefore you won't see it as it would be against regulations.
walshb wrote: » The applicant was asked why she was claiming asylum here. Her answer was fleeing an abusive husband. This is what has been posted. I take it that this is what the applicant actually said. You couldn't make it up.
alastair wrote: » And why would someone granted asylum be still resident in a direct provision centre? Taken at face value, of course.
alastair wrote: » You've some concerns about it's authoritativeness?
alastair wrote: » It must be a cold old world you experience.
alastair wrote: » Ah, it's gratitude you crave?
alastair wrote: » You must have missed the bit about the **** hitting the fan.
alastair wrote: » Is this application approved? No. Is anyone advocating for asylum on those grounds? No.
alastair wrote: » You've nothing to prove the claims aren't true. We've seen that similar prior claims have been considered legitimate by the Integration Centre.
walshb wrote: » This is just it. Ireland has to deal with these kind of bogus and ridiculous claims, and there are people who would advocate her right to stay based on this. "Is anyone advocating for asylum on those grounds? No" How can you know that nobody is advocating asylum on these grounds?
tolerant from cork wrote: » They are still only claims and the person accused stays innocent until proven otherwise.
alastair wrote: » Because you can't point to anyone doing so. So why pretend otherwise? And we are obligated to treat all asylum applications equally - even the ones that fail.
Daisy Dasi wrote: » Refugee: “any person who owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country” (United Nations Convention on Refugees, 1951) quote="alastair;92300516"]So - essentially no-one advocating asylum on the basis of domestic abuse, or any evidence of successful asylum application on that basis. Right so.
walshb wrote: » Nobody's pretending. I'd bet my house on it that the woman has plenty of backers. PI had plenty, didn't she?
alastair wrote: » Aside from your vivid imagination - care to produce a third party advocating asylum on the basis of domestic abuse? Because if you can't - it's provably best not to accuse people of doing so. Straw man arguments and all that.
Daisy Dasi wrote: » I am sorry... why isn't she deported or more importantly...
Daisy Dasi wrote: » why wasn't she turned away at the airport....
Daisy Dasi wrote: » are the immigration officials feeling ok seriously? People like this 'Cecelia' give the genuine AS a bad name...
alastair wrote: » So - essentially no-one advocating asylum on the basis of domestic abuse, or any evidence of successful asylum application on that basis. Right so.
Samson Adeoye, 25, first arrived in Ireland in 2009. He claimed asylum here saying that he had been forced to flee Nigeria after his entire family were murdered by a local tribe. After a romance of just eight months, the happy couple decided to tie the knot. At the time Jacqueline described her wedding day on September 17, 2010, as the happiest day of her life. Following a two-year campaign by Jacqueline, Samson was allowed by the Government to return to his wife and child on December 27, 2012. But just one month later Jacqueline reported her husband to gardaí for allegedly mistreating their daughter. She said: ‘He completely changed when he returned to Ireland. He was always on the computer, he never wanted me to leave the house and he was abusive to our daughter.
When contacted, Samson denied that he had done anything wrong. ‘None of my family is alive. They were all murdered. The marriage is over, she doesn’t want me in the house. He now lives in Carlow on on job- seeker’s allowance.
Posted By : Reprise:- I don't recall anything as sustained since dear Pamela Izevbekhai and her groupies almost wiped out all goodwill for asylum seekers in 2011. God knows if a security guard had burst into her room unannounced - I bet she would still be here and very well rewarded by the State for any inconvenience.
Pamela Izevbekhai, Samson said: ‘I know Pamela from when we were in Sligo.She was at my wedding,she was the one that made the arrangements. To be honest she is a very good woman, she saw that she can help this country and she did everything for my wedding to be in order.’
My marriage was nothing like I thought it would be. People warned me not to marry him but I didn’t listen. He has told me nothing but lies. He told me he used me for citizenship.’
walshb wrote: » Her new friends in the community? Not possible that they could advocate? Get your head out of the ground and face reality. There are legit asylum seekers and bogus ones. It's not ONLY the legit ones who are being supported and backed. Wake up.
alastair wrote: » She wouldn't be deported before the appeals/judicial review process runs it's course. Because, strangely enough, asylum applications aren't judged on the spot at the airport. Something to do with just application of the law. What exactly did you want from these immigration officials?
jank wrote: » Other report seems to see otherwise.http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/07/dublin-regulation-european-asylum-seekers
Daisy Dasi wrote: » Well she has backers... namely Residents Against Racism and the Anti Deportation Ireland members who would protest on behalf of this lady if the State did try to remove her I bet... they have unrealistic requests of the State to completely abolish deportations...
Daisy Dasi wrote: » A buddy of mine (Irish lady) was recently deported from India as her visa expired. Obviously the lady was a not a burden on India and with a population of over a billion and with 2 million orphans you think India has bigger fish to fry... just goes to show....
alastair wrote: » That's only in a court of law. Again - who was accused of a criminal act?
Daisy Dasi wrote: » to ask her her basis in coming to the country and this basis should be basis she is expected to prove in court to claim asylum...
Daisy Dasi wrote: » if she is telling the people of Cork on live radio she came to the country fleeing an abusive husband and sees nothing wrong with that... then maybe, just maybe, she said this on entering the country and turned away...
alastair wrote: » No doubt you'll confirm the support of these groups for asylum on the basis of domestic abuse, with some statements to that effect from them? It shows what exactly? Was your friend seeking asylum in India?
tolerant from cork wrote: » You produced nothing except that report from 2007.
tolerant from cork wrote: » YWhy are you asking everyone to produce a proof for every single word they say?
tolerant from cork wrote: » YYou ask for evidence that people are seeking asylum on the grounds of domestic violence.
tolerant from cork wrote: » YCan you show any evidence that they don't?
tolerant from cork wrote: » YYou are right here, it's not a court, it's a tread where nobody has to show you anything. If you are in doubt that they are telling the truth ... well that's your problem.
alastair wrote: » Asylum applicants don't have to prove anything at the airport - just confirm their asylum application and provide general information for the later interview to determine the merits of the application. She wouldn't be turned away at the airport for an inappropriate asylum application - only for not meeting the requirements for seeking asylum in the state.
Daisy Dasi wrote: » I doubt 'Cecelia' would have to tell RAR and the ADI lot her story to garner support all you gotta say is they want to deport me and they will support her... Just showing deportation is an end process for immigration in every country in the world and should be taken seriously here if its taken seriously even in developing countries.... is my friend back in Ireland screaming "Racists racists!" about the Indian people... funny when Europeans are deported from America or Australia (even India!) the old racism card is never used...
Daisy Dasi wrote: » I never said she had to prove anything... just give her basis for seeking asylum at the airport.. surely this basis HAS to match the basis she applies for in the court or else she is fraudently trying to enter the state by giving false info to immigration officials who have the power to allow her into the State or refuse the right to land...
