jimgoose wrote: » Lot of pollock around, whitefish like cod but suspiciously "mushy". Cod is overfished, apparently.
fleet_admiral wrote: » more than likely its Coley
eisenberg1 wrote: » A good cod or ray n chips is hard to beat. But so many places are not using real cod.....anyone notice that? Its usually some grey tasteless sh1t, don't get me wrong, edible after a glass or two of sherry, but not in the cold light of day.
GreeBo wrote: » spice burger batter sausage portion of chips Hint of salt Drowned in vinegar and a bottle of chef spread out all over the bag once at home. Looks like a mob crime scene when Im done.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Long time since i tasted real cod in a chipper
Deranged96 wrote: » stuffing, peas and gravy chip with a chicken fillet burger, coke, onion rings and a battered mars bar. Get it about once a month and promptly fall into a food coma. I always feel like I'm being judged when I order it :pac:
theteal wrote: » Whurley Burger Nah, not really, that sh!t would kill you before you finish it! Over here, if I don't get a chicken shish, I stick with a doner meat and chips - they really don't do the other usual stuff well. I'm back in Dublin on Thursday and the first thing I'm doing is hitting the Borza to get a proper battered sausage and a proper quarter pounder. . . the chips go without saying!
eisenberg1 wrote: » Forgive my ignorance, but what in the name of Valenti, is a Whurley burger? is that the sound it makes when its coming back up?:eek:
rubadub wrote: » There were DNA tests done a year or so ago, the vast majority of "fresh cod" is cod, the vast majority of "smoked cod" is not cod. I think both were in the 90%'s I expect if its smoked it masks the fish more so they chance it more.
“We tested samples of fish products labeled as either ‘cod’ or ‘haddock’ from randomly selected retail outlets from within ten postal districts across Dublin. Within each district, we selected two samples from each of: two ‘fish and chip’ shops, two fresh fish counters, and four samples (two frozen, two packaged fresh) from each of two supermarkets.” Using DNA barcoding, the scientists genetically identified that 25% of all samples (or 39 out of 156) labeled and sold as ‘cod’ or ‘haddock’ were from entirely different fish species, and were therefore considered mislabeled under EU regulations. When the sample only included smoked fish products labeled as cod and haddock, the mislabeling reached 82%.