Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Made me honestly lol
stevedublin wrote: » The only person lol'ing from all this is Denis O'Brien, enjoy paying your water charge, I won't be.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Of course you won't ....... for now
S.O wrote: » They want people to willingly give them their PPS numbers and yet at the same time they are being investigated for possible data breaches.
Banjo String wrote: » But this potentially applies to 75% of homeowners. Not a great incentive for the 25% metered to give their details, not much deterrent for non metered from not paying. Someone, somewhere jumped the gun on the roll out of water charges. I'm 75% certain of it in fact.
Banjo String wrote: » There's a 75% chance he isn't metered. How will they restrict his pressure. .
Ogham wrote: » There is no need to have a meter before the supply can be restricted. It just needs a special flow restricting valve fitting to the supply . Yes it will require an Irish Water engineer to call out and fit it - but they will probably add the bill for that onto the debt as well as the removal of it if payment is made. They will bill everyone they have names and addresses for - ( which they are getting mainly from LP) If they have recieved no "application" form the bill will not include the free allowances. For non metered homes the occupancy will be assumed to be 2 adults - so that will be €424 without the allowance. They will try and contact non payers and agree payment plans etc - but after 2 failures to make plans or stick to plan - they will instigate flow reduction procedures. The proposal is - that after no reponse to minimum of 2 letters and at least 2 other methods of contact - they will restrict flow. It's interesting to see that flow restriction is not allowed in the UK . Only action there is court.
stevedublin wrote: » In summary, a private company is allowed to hold law-abiding, taxpaying citizens to ransom. Thanks IMF and the other clowns who got us into this mess.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » How are you being held to ransom?
stevedublin wrote: » see Ogham's post that I quoted
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » I read his posf I'm asking you how YOU will be held to ransom?
stevedublin wrote: » They will bill everyone they have names and addresses for - ( which they are getting mainly from LP) If they have recieved no "application" form the bill will not include the free allowances. For non metered homes the occupancy will be assumed to be 2 adults - so that will be €424 without the allowance. They will try and contact non payers and agree payment plans etc - but after 2 failures to make plans or stick to plan - they will instigate flow reduction procedures. The proposal is - that after no reponse to minimum of 2 letters and at least 2 other methods of contact - they will restrict flow. Happy now?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Yeah Congratulations you have yet again quoted someone else even when i have said i read that post. I'll ask again, how will they be "holding YOU to ransom"?
Ogham wrote: » There is no need to have a meter before the supply can be restricted. It just needs a special flow restricting valve fitting to the supply . Yes it will require an Irish Water engineer to call out and fit it
Ogham wrote: » but they will probably add the bill for that onto the debt as well as the removal of it if payment is made.
Ogham wrote: » They will bill everyone they have names and addresses for - ( which they are getting mainly from LP) If they have recieved no "application" form the bill will not include the free allowances. For non metered homes the occupancy will be assumed to be 2 adults - so that will be €424 without the allowance. They will try and contact non payers and agree payment plans etc - but after 2 failures to make plans or stick to plan - they will instigate flow reduction procedures. The proposal is - that after no reponse to minimum of 2 letters and at least 2 other methods of contact - they will restrict flow.
Ogham wrote: » It's interesting to see that flow restriction is not allowed in the UK . Only action there is court.
stevedublin wrote: » same as they will be holding everyone else to ransom.
Barely There wrote: » You mean you won't be able to parasite off the rest of us? Jaysus, that's a disgrace Joe.
S.O wrote: » Some people seem to think that they will have an easy time restricting water supplies that residents will just sit back and do nothing , the trouble they re having now installing water meters in various estates around the country is a walk in the park compared to what they will face when they try to reduce peoples water + plus those that do try to fit any restricting device will be photographed and named and shamed on social media, during the Dublin anti water charges campaign in the mid 90s only a small per % were disconnected at the time and anyone that had their water disconnected community/campaign volunteers reconnected them.
stevedublin wrote: » enjoy paying your water charge, I won't be.
stevedublin wrote: » In summary, a private company is allowed to hold law-abiding, taxpaying citizens to ransom.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Won't be holding me to.ransom so there goes your argument straight away. So how will they be holding YOU to ransom?
S.O wrote: » The only real parasites are those that work for Irish water , bonuses for bosses over 100.000, free yogo classed payed for by the taxpayer, 80+ million wasted on consultants and bills for everyone else to pay for all this.
Oscar Gateaux wrote: » Does not compute