audi12 wrote: » who is taklking about friends hes looking for a woman not a friend
ancapailldorcha wrote: » What happened to your Looks, Money & Status philosophy?
audi12 wrote: » if he becomes friends first with her he will get stuck in friendzone and never have a chance with her
Wibbs wrote: » Tickety boo if all you want is notches on your bedpost, but beyond that and into an actual relationship you will require something more and developing a good friendship is a damn good start. Don't get me wrong I am fully behind the idea of going for the woman first. As I have often said in the word "girlfriend" the "friend" part comes secondary. but without that part it's going nowhere. If you both don't connect beyond the gender and nekkid bits it will get old real quickly. I don't care how sexy/gorgeous you think she is, without engaging on a personal level you will get tired of looking at and if I may be so crass, fúcking her. Actually you can see that with married men who have affairs. Very often the women they're cheating on are confused/gobsmacked because the "other woman" is older/less goodlooking/sexy than they are. It's nearly always down to a better emotional connection they don't have with their primary partner.
audi12 wrote: » Women like guys that are ugly and not fit because they can control them it was proven in studies done
Wibbs wrote: » He discovered/is admitting he's lacking in all three mayhap? Yea seems like a bit of a turnaround alright. Oh BTW "leagues" do exist. Hate to break it to some - both those how buy into the PUA BS and those who bought into Hollywood - but there it is. Looks and money are a part of that, but I have found access is most of it. Looks and money gain more access to "higher" leagues, but access itself is what it's all about. IE the plainest fashion photographers assistant will get more interaction and action from fashion models than the better looking dude in some local nightclub. If that's what you're after of course. In reality I have found most men aren't that into that vibe, though may say they are.
Business Cat wrote: » You think that anything Chris Brown said about women, this the charming bloke that slapped around his girlfriend, has any credence whatsoever?
macplato wrote: » The problem is that many (most?) Irish people are very slow to openly, joyously admit that they fancy someone. It's never just an information, like for many other nationalities. For some reason there is a lot of shame and embarrassment attached to sexual desire in this country, and it really messes up the dynamics between men and women here.
Business Cat wrote: » You think that anything Chris Brown said about women, this the charming bloke that slapped around his girlfriend, has any credence whatsoever? Jesus wept. You really need help buddy, seriously, you are beyond deluded.
Wibbs wrote: » +1 if Brown told me the sky was blue I'd double check.
Dial Hard wrote: » +1,000,000 I didn't think this thread could get any more depressing, but it just managed to.
Mike747 wrote: » Depressing how? I think its been interesting.
Dial Hard wrote: » I find it extremely depressing that someone could be so disillusioned with the entire process that he identifies with Chris Brown's opinion of women.
Mike747 wrote: » No harm being a little cynical though.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » I don't get how that's an Irish thing. I would think that that attitude would be fairly ubiquitous among people who fancy someone for more than a quick tumble. It's fairly horrible to tell someone you fancy them when they don't feel the same way. Logically it makes sense as there's no point devoting time to that relationship in the hope that might become more but that doesn't take away from the embarrassment of being rejected.
ongarboy wrote: » Very interesting observations from Macplato that hit the nail on head for a lot of what I see too. I wonder is a lot of how the Irish act in such matters down to an inferiority complex combined with historic Catholic guilt. Anything remotely sexual puts people on guard instead of acting naturally and if there isn't reciprocation, the sense of rejection, embarrassment and anger would only affect someone who wasn't confident or comfortable in their own skin to begin with? I do see some non nationals in Ireland being far more forward in paying compliments and flirting that come across natural but if an ill at ease Irish guy said the same to a girl, it would come across pervy. Example, in Dunnes the other day and the guy in front of me was of Mediteranean region origin (I think) and he told the checkout girl (who happened ot be of African origin and was beautiful) that she had the most beautiful face he had ever seen (sure he was lacing it with charm and flirt) but she just laughed and while it was unusual to witness, it did not seem odd. If John from Tullamore was in front of me and he said the same thing to Deirdre the checkout girl from Blanchardstown, it would just come across comical at best or creepy at worst. It's no-ones fault as I think we are all products of our environment but if we are aware of what is not working for us, then there is no excuse to not change.
Wibbs wrote: » Fair enough, but on the other hand be careful what you wish for as some cultures can go too far the other way. The same Latin "charm" can get real old real quick if it's all the bloody time.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » Care to provide links to a few of these studies?
EdenHazard wrote: » On the subject, American girls are the worst of the lot. Arghhh.