dxhound2005 wrote: » I think it's a bit mad myself to base the charge on the number of people in the house and give so called free allowances to everyone. Much too much administration. But if that is the system then establishing who is living at the address by PPS numbers is logical. It should just be a charge for whatever is on the meter or where there is no meter a charge linked to the property tax. Just my opinion of course but that's how it is done in England for instance.
Banjo String wrote: » Here's a mad idea. Irish Water could check with the Department of Social protection as to how many children are registered to an address, they should have them details already of they're paying child protection to the house. I get your point on how England charges for its water, but they have a lower rate of vat than us (which was increased here in a response to the abolition of rates, then raised again). Add to that, the cost per unit here seems to be among the highest in Europe, despite us being one of the wettest countries in Europe. I have 2 children, I will not be giving the info they request from me to Irish Water. The whole pps number, and what they 'might' do with it is legally questionable.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Are you some sort of solicitor or barrister?
dxhound2005 wrote: » What legal questions are you referring to?
This is a matter for the Department of Social Protection in the first instance. It is an offence for any person or body to request or hold a record of a PPS number unless they are permitted by law (the Social Welfare Acts) to do so. It is the duty of all bodies to ensure that they are specified in law as being so entitled before they request or hold a record of any person's PPS number.
dxhound2005 wrote: » You can have as much as you like of that wet water for free, it's in your local river or lake and all you need is a bucket.
Banjo String wrote: » Well under the data protection act, it would seem they're not even entitled to be asking for it, never mind passing it on to a third party.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Make a complaint to the Data Protection Commissioner.http://www.dataprotection.ie/ViewDoc.asp?fn=/documents/rights/2f.htm&CatID=21&m=r
Banjo String wrote: » Yes. Well under the data protection act, it would seem they're not even entitled to be asking for it, never mind passing it on to a third party.http://www.dataprotection.ie/docs/Use-of-PPSN/1247.htm Brilliant response. Although I notice you ignore the fact I pointed out how we have had 2 vat increases that apparently went towards water. Also the fact that the department of social protection already have details of children in a household, therefore making Irish Water request for details unnecessary. Why would that be?
delw wrote: » Is Irish Water a private company or a public body?
chasm wrote: » Why aren't they entitled to ask? The Social Welfare bill passed through the Dail in July which allowed IW to process these detailshttp://www.moneyguideireland.com/irish-water-to-use-pps-numbers.html
EunanMac wrote: » Did you not have to give your PPS number for the recent home tax anyway ?
Ogham wrote: » But that was Revenue - and they are the main users of PPS numbers anyway. People are more unsure about giving it to Irish Water for some reason.
dxhound2005 wrote: » That reason is that they want to avoid paying out money. They would have no problem giving their PPS number to anyone to claim money .
Banjo String wrote: » Yet they don't want to give it to claim for a 'free allowance'. Go figure. The whole thing stinks, and after Hogan being caught out lying about his knowledge of the millions of euro spent on consultants, the people are right to be wary of giving their details to a utility company.
Ogham wrote: » Revenue used an outside firm to handle maost of the LPT registration etc (Abtran) - no one worried about them getting PPS numbers and all the rest. I hope that Revenue's data protection policy mentions giving data to third parties working for them. Abtran are also working for Irish Water - handling a lot of the registration etc - so there's not much difference really . Just people trying to find anything to moan about that's connected to Irish Water.
dxhound2005 wrote: » I know you are some sort of barrister or solicitor. Were you one of the "high powered" CAHWT legal team that was supposed to smash the Household Charge? I think these people refusing to supply PPS numbers are just a new version of the Don't Register Don't pay brigade.
Ogham wrote: » I hope that Revenue's data protection policy mentions giving data to third parties working for them.
Ogham wrote: » Abtran are also working for Irish Water - handling a lot of the registration etc - so there's not much difference really . Just people trying to find anything to moan about that's connected to Irish Water.
geeksauce wrote: » Banjo a simple solution for you is to not give them your PPS Number don't get any allowances and pay the full amount, that way this whole issue can be avoided.
Banjo String wrote: » Doubtful. Wouldn't they have just handed it over to IW already if requested?
Barely There wrote: » No, no, no, you seem to be getting very confused. He only believes in taking a principled stand where the situation requires him to pay less tax, not more.
niamh.foley wrote: » Now should i fill it out and leave my PPS Number blank or should i inc it or should i just sent it back with like some people are doing.
Also there is not a hope in hell they are getting my Bank Details i'll be happy to pay in the post office if i have to..
Now back to filling my 10ltr bottles of Water and storing them.
geeksauce wrote: » Wonder why they are bringing in charges, is it something to do with wastage etc.
niamh.foley wrote: » Wastage maybe if they didnt sign off on 180million on some semi-private company starting up. and spent that money upgrading the Water Systems around the Country we wouldnt have so many water leaks around the country.. this chrage has nothing to do with wastage it all about getting more money off people just like the Communication tax that is coming in all cos RTE want more money.