YbFocus wrote: » Tax on a 3l+ would then be 4.95 daily which doesn't seem nearly as bad
OSI wrote: » Are you using an unofficial app?
YbFocus wrote: » Good luck, they are somewhere there Hint: possibly not at ground level
GvidoR wrote: » I guess I'll have to go back with a shovel and a flashlight in the middle of the night. :pac: Also, I didn't notice the plates was so weird until you mentioned it. :eek:
Sobanek wrote: » http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/bmw/m5/bmw-5-series-m5 1990/2671027 Has been up for a month.... So, so awesome!
quadrifoglio verde wrote: » That's my 25th birthday present to myself. I've wanted one for ages now but need to wait for classic insurance!:( hopefully the price won't go up to much, although that's priced well and looks to be well minded. One of the few non italian cars on my bucket list
toastedpickles wrote: » My wish is to own all the saabs bmws there are :pac:
Sobanek wrote: » BMW w....r :pac:
toastedpickles wrote: » :pac::pac::pac: Anyways, a bit of trim has come away from the side of the 9-5, any idea with what i can stick it back on with?
Bpmull wrote: » Tec 7 would do the trick it definitely wouldn't come of again anyway. Well do you mean like the pieces of trim that run up the side of the car half way up the door ?
MetzgerMeister wrote: » Mildly interesting??? You mean mind-numbingly boring!!!
Bpmull wrote: » I have to say I have always thought the Korean stuff well Hyundai and Kia had seriously unefficient Diesel engine don't know what there like now any Hyundai my parents had they had 3 were dogs on diesel. 05 Santa 25-30 mpg kind of expected bit Stone Age technology wise anyway. 07 Santa Fe auto l 2.2 diesel 25 mpg is all it ever seen. 2010 2.0 diesel ix-35 manual we thought would be good 30-35 max mpg which is just sh!t for a modern diesel. And yes it was always longish trips very little town driving. Relations have had kiss and they seem equally bad there current is an optima auto 1.7 diesel and they recon it never sees 40 mpg more 35 mpg and that gets a good few long runs.
Ded_Zebra wrote: » That's funny. The worst tank that I've ever seen on our optima is 6.2l/100km. That's 45MPG. Can't imagine it being as bad as you say but it's not as good as the Insignia before it. However it's way better to drive than the Insignia and much better spec so not much to complain about really. EDIT: Yes some other cars might have done better but the main thing is that a car I bought for €300, that's 15 years old using, 25+ year old engine technology, with 370,000 miles on it and it did nearly as good as one of these "very modern efficient" cars.
Ded_Zebra wrote: » Yeah you're right. That's all diesel drivers talk about though because there is sweet f all chance of them having any fun! How about this for mildly interesting. I've actually bought the replacement for the Primera. It needs a small bit of work which the previous owner (a friend) is taking care of before I get it. With it I'll be lucky to get 1/2 as many miles to the gallon
Bpmull wrote: » I'd say what ruins the relations optima is the auto box I think it struggles a bit only a 1.7 engine at the end of the day. As for your car that is serious going for its age and what car your comparing it too no doubting that 50mpg I think is good going for any diesel anything over that is a bonus. I recon there Diesel engine are a lot better than they were even a few years ago for economy. I don't know there just something I never liked was Kia or Hyundai cars and I'm fairly open to most car brands.
wonski wrote: » "Stolen" from my brother's FB. That is his old (well - not any more) Beetle. Can't embed this, unfortunately.http://dai.ly/x24uu8d Not an original engine btw;)