AntiRip wrote: » Any problems with 3 of you doing fitness apps? I suppose if you are all using different technologies it shouldn't be a problem. Thinking of an algorithm I suppose is the key issue?
siblers wrote: » They want the 3 of us to meet up to make sure we go in different directions. I'll either end up using shimmer sensors to record a person's activities or else come up with a new idea. The lecturers made a big deal about the algorithms alright, seems to be one of the most important elements of the project
AntiRip wrote: » Something like this for Android would be cool.http://www.behance.net/gallery/MeterMe-Fitness-Application/6244843 Not sure about the scope of it, it may not be 'complicated enough' or too advanced altogether. Beautiful and very clean UI though.
JFlah wrote: » some sort of a running feature included - measure speed using accelerometer or some such ? We should have all pitched fitness apps for the craic
siblers wrote: » Yeah I was thinking of someting like that, use GPS etc to log where they ran as well. Think there's libraries availble for a lot of that stuff so it might not be crazy hard to do. There's a few different directions I can take it in at least which is pretty good. That Meter.Me App is pure filth
JFlah wrote: » Cross platform/hybrid app built on html5 is an option too - build once available on multiple platforms is a great angle.
AntiRip wrote: » That's a great idea with the HTML5. Also I think C++ is a cross platform language. Also have a look at thishttp://phonegap.com Really really cool stuff.
siblers wrote: » Sweet. I'm gonna try make a basic app over the summer just to give me an idea of what to do. I kinda like the idea that we get to implement the project straight away instead of having to start in semester 2. Gives more time to focus on the code etc
siblers wrote: » Can any of ye see what actual marks ye got for work experience? I got 30 credits but can't see the breakdown of marks.
Encrypted Pigeon wrote: »
gbro800 wrote: » I'm working full time over the summer so hoping that'll stand to me but on the flip side, I've had very little time to think about the project. It could be a hectic semester ahead! I've noticed the new module list for 4th year is on ITT website. At least we have a better idea of what to expect now.
siblers wrote: » Been focusing on my java repeat so didn't do anything with it. Are ye going to that video bridging thing we have?
JFlah wrote: » If we had got more notice it would have helped .. I am only available for 2 days but I'll go to those. Same as timetables 3/4 months to sort things out and then it ends up last minute How was Java hope it went well.
siblers wrote: » Have it Thursday, every extra day helps :pac:
siblers wrote: » Software was last week from what I gathered and OOAD isn't till next week, i've no idea when the results are out though.
siblers wrote: » Just had it there, if we had that paper back in Christmas i'd definitley have passed. I hope I did enough as we had a very handy question on BST but I thought the same back in Christmas so **** knows :pac:
JFlah wrote: » I'm sure you'll be grand you sound happy enough with it. Hopefully ye get grades back fairly quickly now.
siblers wrote: » Tuesday week. I'll feel kinda daft going to the video bridging without knowing my results!
gbro800 wrote: » I assumed it was compulsory to do the Video Bridge course? I'm going anyway, might be interesting in the TV studio, I'll be a complete noob to that kind of stuff
JFlah wrote: » It is compulsory I think but they left it so late to tell people that I'm not sure if everyone is available ... I can only do 2 maybe 3 days as it is.
