dublin runner wrote: » No offense but this is not a training log.
TFBubendorfer wrote: » You don't say!
Stazza wrote: » But if you are running 6 min miles, you'll probably sneak into the 'runner' category If you decide to run and need anything, let me know.
dublin runner wrote: » A stair lift for the Barrow Hill please :pac:
W.B. Yeats wrote: » Can we move on from the Heaney debacle? I'm intrigued at who's number 1. Kavanagh? Clarke? Wilde's work surely hasn't enough depth.
Stazza wrote: » This morning, during my run (this now makes it running related and ok to post on this log), I was thinking about your question. You're like a teenage boy who's just realised that 'it' can do more than pee. If you don't slow down, this will get messy and embarrassing. We have to talk about Heaney and Yeats and I suppose, give clues to Ireland's number 1 poet and, world number 3...
W.B. Yeats wrote: » It took you until your teenage years to work that one out? I suppose there are pros and cons with negative capability- the creativity and ingenuity to allow us operate beyond traditional bounds-but it may also be responsible for you creating a league of Ireland of poets and poetry. and worse again it seems you are hell bent on creating a world cup extravaganza. You may need to up the speed of some of those miles you're doing to take your mind off such flights of fancy
Stazza wrote: » Haha - good man - I take it you're a man. So we're pretty much about the same standard given y(our) pb's. If you're still running, then maybe we could have a wee chat. I'm open to hearing what you've got to say about masters marathon plans etc. And just to be clear, I didn't say everybody in Ireland was a hobbyjogger. I said, my definition of a hobbyjogger was somebody slower 2:40. It's important to get these things right otherwise some might not take you seriously. Although, I think I'd call it more in the, slower than 2:37 range. I stand by that. But remember, it's just my definition/thoughts. And regarding elites in Ireland - we'll have to differ again. For me, 2:15 or quicker is the bottom end of elite. That's not to say somebody running 2:18-2:24 isn't a good runner. That area is what I'd call sub elite to decent club runner.
ultrapercy wrote: » Anyone who runs competitively but whos primary source of income is not derived from the sport of running, is by definition, a "hobbyjogger". That term is demeaning to many on boards like these who train and race with pride regardless of their level or ability and see it (quite rightly) as snobbery. The term "hobbyjogger" is used a lot by the pimple squeezing, rasist, sexist, self pleasuring pond life that frequent Letsrun, it may even have been coined by same and is surely beneath a man of your literary aspirations ?
Chivito550 wrote: » This log is a bit rubbish tbh. Far too much talking, not enough racing!
Stazza wrote: » The plot thickens and the characters get thicker:pac::pac::pac:
TFBubendorfer wrote: » Well done Jake! http://jkrong.fastrunningblog.com/blog-08-23-2014.html Stazza, can you take credit for that?
pa4 wrote: » Good to see you back with some consistency. What will you be peaking at with your mileage?
ThebitterLemon wrote: » If you stopped to "water the flowers" on mile 3 of your Saturday run, what were you doing on the second last mile? Fertilising them TbL Ps I only count 13 splits!