steddyeddy wrote: » Complete two tier system. You're treated according to the money you were born into.
Turtwig wrote: » I don't agree with this at all. The only thing private does is get's you to see some consultants faster. Pretty much everyone is treated the same, and often time waiting lists are such that being private makes not one jot of a difference especially when it comes to diagnostics. (Though obviously don't tell the expensively paying patrons that.)
steddyeddy wrote: » I was an intern biochemist in a hospital I won't name but I have to say the waiting times make a huge difference. How would they not?
Turtwig wrote: » You misunderstand me. Waiting times can indeed make all the difference. However, the order of many waiting lists are rarely if ever determined by who's private and who's not. The order is determined by who is likely to be the most urgent patient.
suicide_circus wrote: » Have an older relative going through the motions with the hse at the moment. Most are very well meaning people but the levels of inefficiency and incompetence we see daily are breathtaking. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Any time my relative sees anyone, the whole saga has to be gone through again, despite the fact that they have his medical file beside them the size of two phonebooks. The hospital is cleaned once per day by disinterested agency staff, your average shopping centre is cleaner. It's only really when you see first hand the medical facilities and care available in the germanic and scandanavian countries that you realise how badly behind we are in primary, secondary and tertiary care. It's scary.
Sociopath2 wrote: » Your mistake is thinking the health service is run for the benefit of patients. In this country it's run for the benefit of the people who work in it.
steddyeddy wrote: » This. The HSE is a complete waste of money. We need to tear up whatever agreement is preventing us from getting rid of inefficiencies in the system.
Dozen Wicked Words wrote: » What inefficiency would you start with.
Sleepy wrote: » Yes, I'm sure this could be done privately for a few grand but, frankly, it shouldn't have to be. I pay more than enough tax to cover it. I'm not one for big government but free, single-tier healthcare and education are two things I passionately believe in. If you want a fancy room and an a la carte menu, fine, use a private hospital but the level of care you receive should be the same whether you're a dole-scamming junkie or the president.
hairyslug wrote: » For myself (meningitis) Suppose you have to take the good with the bad
Deleted User wrote: » Waiting 2 years for a referral, got a call about it 5 months ago. "Hello is this Buttonftw?" "It is yeah." "I'm someone from the HSE, I have it down here that you're waiting to see an ENT specialist." "That's right yeah." "Well we're just calling around to make sure everyone on the list still wants to be on the list." "Okay..." "Do you want to stay on the list." "Yes..." "Alright that's fine." "Any ideas how it's going to be?" "No we're just updating the waiting list." Haven't heard anything since.
Deleted User wrote: » Similar for us, granny hasn't been well on-and-off for a few years. Constantly switching medication then finding out from another doctor she shouldn't because of something else she's on. Getting 3 separate appointments for one thing. It's not just the hospitals either, chemists are useless, rarely having everything needed and when they do the brands and dosages change month-to-month which is annoying for my mother to figure out every month, very unfair to someone in their 80s trying to figure it out alone.
suicide_circus wrote: » If you're an old person with no one to help you or vouch for you in this situation you're fcuked. Scary.