Dayum wrote: » Compulsory public schooling is child abuse.
miss no stars wrote: » The only one that struck me as being genuinely unfair was that you couldn't bring any OTC medication to school (inhalers and insulin only, basically). Which might sound fine, but they were completely inflexible on it even on a case by case basis and I have a disorder that means I tend to be in some degree of pain (anywhere from mild to severe) most of the time and my treatment consisted of ibuprofen (& paracetamol if particularly bad) as required with 4 hours between doses. But because it was a painkiller the school wouldn't let me carry them (fair enough, don't necessarily trust a 12 year old not to accidentally overdose or OD in deperation due to pain), nor would they allow me to store them in the school office and get them as required. Mum queried it when I was in first year and fainted during assembly and was told that if a pupil is sick they're to see the school receptionist (who's not qualified to dispense medication!!). So when I did go to the receptionist looking for painkillers I was basically told "school policy says I can't give you any painkillers". So I had to option of going back to class (in tears from the pain) or going home. So because of a stupid school rule that students can't carry painkillers on them my attendance never went above 75% until I got old enough that I told them where to go with their rule. At which point I was already getting sick with something else. Making a rule preventing access to medication actually strikes me as really cruel, not just unfair.
The_Valeyard wrote: » wha? How?
Dayum wrote: » Because the model of public schooling is built on our dated view of the Industrial Revolution. I.e - massive factories (schools) churning out products (children) on a conveyor belt having thrown every individual child (with different wants, needs, desires, interests and passions) under one group to be separated into categories based upon some abstract grading system. There have been countless studies done that clearly shows as a child progresses through public schooling his or her creativity, curiosity and individuality diminishes and eventually, inevitably disappears. I have friends that have taught in public schools for the best part of 15 years and they can attest to the fact that the children are bored, but not as bored as the teachers. It's cruelty that we lock these kids up for 6-8 hours, 5 days a week for 18 years to learn something they have no need for in life nor something they wish to learn and then decide their life for them by telling them they're just not good enough, not smart enough, not worthy enough when they get their grades. It's not that these kids are some sub-species of human - it's a broken, outdated system that has destroyed their hopes, dreams and desires. Why should a child on the verge of understanding decimals and fractions be told to put down that arithmetic textbook and take out their poetry book?! Why should a child with curiosity in computers be punished and roared at for scribbling in their notebook because they're bored learning about Irish?! The Department of Education has a lot to answer for. The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development has stated that a massive percentage of Irish males are functionally illiterate and we spend more time (with the exception of Israel) learning about religion in class with biology, physics, chemistry and the sciences given a backseat. And then if you wish to see your child receive a real education, along comes the government (who apparently know better than you as a parent) to punish you for not sending your child to be indoctrinated, to be told he/she is not good enough, to kill any creativity and individuality your child has. Why is it that a child that has self-educated about the human body be told they cannot study medicine because they had no interest in history or art? What an absolute joke. Our education system is built, and designed, to the benefit of the unions - not the children that is, ironically, claims to help.
Lia_lia wrote: » Did anyone else's primary school ban Pokemon cards?
Tar.Aldarion wrote: » A guy shaved his head and was suspended until it grew back. If people were messing with pencil cases or phones etc one teacher would take them, and just throw them out the window, several floors up.
Tar.Aldarion wrote: » I wouldn't put it past him
CrazyRabbit wrote: » Well someone has been watching Ken Robinson.http://youtu.be/zDZFcDGpL4Uhttp://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity
CrazyRabbit wrote: » Well someone has been watching Ken Robinson. ]
Dayum wrote: » I have never, at any point in my life, heard of Ken Robinson.
Whatsisname wrote: » Didn't have any unreasonable rules really myself as my school was easy going but my girlfriends secondary school put a ban on popcorn
The Singing Beard wrote: » Drinking was completely forbidden in classrooms. If you even took a sip from your water bottle in class, the bottle would be seized and not returned until the end of the day.
Wacker The Attacker wrote: » I got suspended for getting my hair cut.
Tin Foil Hat wrote: » I've made up my mind on this. Someday in the not too distant future a court is going to decide that kids' constitutional right - no, obligation - to be educated cannot be interrupted by power-tripping gobsh1tes imposing stupid rules like this.