Wile E. Coyote wrote: » No really technical/scientific reasons. I went with Gerrard because he's always good for points. He should start each game, scores goals, gets assists and nearly always puts in a MotM performance. Barkley and Coutinho I think are two young players who are going to have very good seasons and I've Siggy on the bench. Leaving him there for the United game as I want to see how Zarate does. Nothing against Ramsey or Eriksen I just went with who I think will do better. In saying that my whole team could change 20 times by Saturday morning.
OneColdHand wrote: » Fair enough. Everton have a nasty start so I think Barkley is poor choice early in the season.
Lemlin wrote: » Looks good to me as we've the same front 7! I don't particularly rate Monk but a lad I know supports Swansea and reckons he's a great coach and that the Spanish players like Michu have been cleared out because they were causing problems last season. My friend watched every game of theirs last year and has both Siggy and Bony in his team. He reckons Bony was the first name on his team sheet. I'd have no worries except your subs. Albrighton could be out for a few weeks and Wisdom may not start. I've also gone with Fab over Hazard for reasons outlined above.
Ziegler1988 wrote: » Someone on FFS said that Mourinho gave an interview on ChelseaTV and named Costa as the penalty taker. Don't know how true it is
average_runner wrote: » Toure played more in the attacking mid three last year as Aguero was injured and was on pens. Same for Ramsey as Arteta and Wilshere played the central role. Hazard will take the pens and set pieces.
Dearg81 wrote: » Why are so many people going with Luis? Mourinho has said before how much he rates Azpilicueta(soemthing about wishing he had 11 of him!) and he had a great season. I know Azpilicueta is a natural right back but I can see a lot of rotation between the Chelsea full backs this season.
Ziegler1988 wrote: » Costa and Cahill or Studge and Evans? (I have no other Chelsea or ManU defence/GK as well) Leaning towards the latter since I think Southampton could be in for a hiding GW1 and I would want Studge in my squad eventually anyway. But I would probably captain Costa GW2 and Chelsea's defence is much more proven at cleanies than ManU's
roryc wrote: » Coutinho out for Eriksen is the obvious change Raf32. Your DF is very weak too.
Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: » Hazard or Fabregas for Chelsea? Both should get high no of assists and goals
Mr.Prodston wrote: » Ok so now I'm very much toying with this.... The forward line is utterly glorious and I don't think the defence suffers an awful lot, just no Chelsea coverage. Instead of having 3 heavy hitting mids and Siggy, I have 2 and more importantly the 3 best options up front. If one of the front 3 isn't working out then I can easily downgrade and bring in a mid. QPR and Chelsea rotate so Hoilett and Matic could play every 2nd week or whoever the best fit is. I'm still trying to see if there's a better combo of those 3 mids but for now that's where I'm at.
roryc wrote: » Wayyy too top heavy. Matic and Hoilett shouldn't be near anyones team, not even the bench! Sacrificing far too much.
LostBoy101 wrote: » Would anybody go for Lukaku at 9.0?
