essem 6590 ganne wrote: » We'll only ever be able to travel back to the time when the time machine was invented, so the person who invents it won't be able to go anywhere. (well, when he turns it on, steps inside, and waits 60 mins, he'll have travelled an hour into the future, but then he can go back an hour from there)
smcgiff wrote: » What scientists are you talking about? Physicists?I'd say most would say travelling into the past was practically impossible. In theory yes but would involve all the energy in the universe type of impractical theory. It may be possible to travel into the future by using close to the speed of light travel, but some people would not consider that true time travel.
smcgiff wrote: » I meant impossible even in the far future or any future. That far into the future is hard to fathom. Maybe consider a time beyond Ireland winning its next eurovision song contest.
Bongalongherb wrote: » But we are at this time oblivious to future technological advances, so how can we fathom the realistic possibility of this in the future ?. But we can. I hate boxes.
smcgiff wrote: » But we can suppose/accept the laws of physics will not change.
Spunge wrote: » If time travel to any point in the past was ever possible in the infinite future surely we would have records or proof of this in the past or to the extreme level we'd already have crap loads of time machines coz so many people already travelled into our past from our future.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Just think how different the world today would be if you went back 60,000 years and shot a few early humans!
Bongalongherb wrote: » That's a very good point. But who's to know it didn't happen, or happening now ? as is said...never interfere with the space time continuum ? surely that would be upheld by any visiting persons from the future from destabilising a world ? who knows but it would make sense. Maybe there is a prime directive not to interfere with the past in any way, makes sense as a protocol regarding the seriousness of doing such a thing. And who's to say it hasn't happened in our past ?. We have a strange history of which is not all known.
Yeah but the people who do this prime directive would have to police an infinite amount of time, or at least the length of the universe.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » The general theory I've heard, which has some convincing scientific basis to back it up, is that if a time machine was built, time travel forwards and backwards would be possible but for a quantum reason I can't remember, it would be almost impossible to build a machine which could go back to a time before it was built. So in other words, once a time machine exists, travel in both directions will be possible but only as far back as the moment of that particular machine's creation. If this is indeed the case, I can foresee a scenario in which time machines are aged like wine and become more valuable as they get older, whereas brand new machines will be considered junk.
JustAddWater wrote: » It wouldn't be any different. It's already happened as far as we're concerned so life doesn't change for us
AnonoBoy wrote: » I don't believe in time travel.