mozattack wrote: » Very good post, DICE are innovators and yes there has been mistakes but that is through innovation
miju wrote: » No the mistakes have been made through lazy and misdirected programming lets not make excuses for DICE and / or EA here. Answer me this do you call them releasing Second Assault with ALL the same map glitches that they PATCHED OUT in BF3 (so they obviously knew they were there) and reintroduced back into BF4 as innovation or lazyness ????? Good points SIR. Lets call a spade a spade it's lazyness and constant bull**** excuses. How about they are working hard on fixing the game issues ???? So hard in fact they decided to patch in a megladon onto a map and stick a football field onto the CTE. Frostbite 1 was a great engine, then they redone it with Frostbite 2 and it worked alot better but Frostbite 3 and as a result BF4 is a disaster after nearly 12 months of releasing patches (which broke the game more). Call it what you wan't but it certainly isn't innovation and certainly isn't looking after it's community either, but sure you don't need me to tell you that look at Battlelog posts and Facebook posts as well still plenty of "fix the game" and so on.
ktulu123 wrote: » Personally enjoying Dragon's Teeth & rarely get any of these 'netcode' bugs that people complain about. Even with my ****e internet
miju wrote: » No the mistakes have been made through lazy and misdirected programming lets not make excuses for DICE and / or EA here. Answer me this do you call them releasing Second Assault with ALL the same map glitches that they PATCHED OUT in BF3 (so they obviously knew they were there) and reintroduced back into BF4 as innovation or lazyness ????? Lets call a spade a spade it's lazyness and constant bull**** excuses. How about they are working hard on fixing the game issues ???? So hard in fact they decided to patch in a megladon onto a map and stick a football field onto the CTE. Frostbite 1 was a great engine, then they redone it with Frostbite 2 and it worked alot better but Frostbite 3 and as a result BF4 is a disaster after nearly 12 months of releasing patches (which broke the game more). Call it what you wan't but it certainly isn't innovation and certainly isn't looking after it's community either, but sure you don't need me to tell you that look at Battlelog posts and Facebook posts as well still plenty of "fix the game" and so on.
mozattack wrote: » I did say there was mistakes and mistakes come through innovation, e.g .levolution and all that jazz probably caused a lot of trouble.
mozattack wrote: » I read Battlelog all the time and moaners moan so it isnt a fair reflection of the community.
The Red wrote: » If they had released Hardline on the original date, it would bomb and everyone would complain that it wasnt ready and was too weak content and originality wise or whatever. They were right to hold it. At least they are coming around to the notion of trying to prepare a game properly BEFORE releasing it. Too bad it took the massive disaster of BF4 to teach them that lesson. If it did in fact teach them..
mozattack wrote: » Question: If they announced a 6 map DLC called New York invasion with 6 new guns etc would you buy it for €15, even if you have premium? I would and please do as I am not sure Hardline is the game for me and waiting until BF5 will hurt
The Red wrote: » Has anyone tried this yet? Looks like fun, but Itll be probably patched out real soon...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMS5pVbO8Gk#t=56
dreamers75 wrote: » Assault Rifle with Ammo Box and C4 and I would be a GOD!!!!!!!
Tazzimus wrote: » That was the BC2 set up if I'm remembering correctly, was crazy.
spitfireIRL wrote: » Nah if you'd an assault rifle you had a grenade launcher, if you wanted to use C4 you had to use an all kit weapon (shotgun, M1 Garand etc)
Spear wrote: » I still want my Garand back.
aaronh007 wrote: » And me my G3