MetzgerMeister wrote: » I mentioned the splitter ya blind bastard :P
Foxhole Norman wrote: » I want all of that 6! Give me a tourer though!
Cleveland Hot Pocket wrote: » Can you find one with the EML on and no nct :cool:
Deleted User wrote: » Any of ye folks able to tell me what I should be looking out for on a USB car charger? I have one, and if I attach my phone, it doesn't really charge it. It more just kinda maintains the battery life (which isn't great if your phone is already on it's last legs). Was gonna get this:http://www.7dayshop.com/dynamode-2-port-high-power-usb-car-charger-black Are there certain power ratings or such?
Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » Anyone know if im paying a good price. My focus. New coolant bottle. Coolant Engine cleaned down completely New Rad hose €160 .... is that good ?
Toyotafanboi wrote: » sounds dear by diy standards. you'd comfortably do that for sub €50 yourself and it's a pretty basic diy task. but a garage has to make money and if they are using new parts then yeah i suppose it's fair.
MuppetCheck wrote: » Buy a belkin. Great quality wires with them too. The one I bought was about €35 online, got it with a lightning cable for €15 in TK Max. Hasn't failed even with a close on dead Nexus tablet being used with an OBD II.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » yeah, i mean if the reservoir bottle was only €22 you can be sure the rad hose was only around €5 - 10... then say €20 for a gallon of coolant. we're talking €50 for parts tops. €110 labour for what is maybe 30 mins ish (i assume) to do the work and whatever it takes to wash the engine. easy for a diy'er to say it's dear but if you can't do it yourself and you took the car to a half decent garage then the price is ok ish imo.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » what engine is in it? hard to believe the bottle is cheaper than the hose.
dgt wrote: » Brimmed the car again, 34mpg once more. Perfect! 3 brims so far, 2 with the same result This calls for me to relax for the evening :cool: Wonder will the 156 be as handy if I ever get it finished.... Probably, wait no, definitely not :eek:
Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » 1.6tdci... priced both myself from same place.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » thats cool, is that in the merc? what is it 2.0 petrol? i've been doing the same in corolla over the last month or more, brimming it, recording mileage and brimming it. driving the same routes week on week, getting a consistent 38-39mpg.
dgt wrote: » Yep thats the merc, 2.0 petrol. Mind you I'm driving it very differently than the 406, where I'd put the boot down at every excuse I got. These days I just waft about and go much handier Is your Corolla a 1.4 or 1.6?
Toyotafanboi wrote: » i assumed petrol, sorry!
Toyotafanboi wrote: » 1.4, not being driven very hard. interesting to hear your results because i'd been wondering lately what nicer cars would have similar mpg results. can add a c-class to that list now :P
Sobanek wrote: » Looks like it. Or the suspension is gone :pac: Is there a "no fat chicks" sticker on it? If there is then It's definitely lowered