budsalt wrote: » During the battle of the Somme the 16th Irish Division suffered losses of 224 officers and 4,090 men; despite these very heavy losses the division gained a reputation as first-class shock troops. I think men like these deserve a minuet's silence and a little respect.
wicklowstevo wrote: » its no longer amazing how some misguided people can defend the indefensible ........
budsalt wrote: » Not sure who you are referring to, could you be a little more precise please?
Happyman42 wrote: » Royals would probably turn up at it, if it meant their 'privilege subvention' was continued.
wicklowstevo wrote: » people who jeer and abuse the Irish president at a service for Irish war dead in Ireland . deserve neither respect, acknowledgment or to be defended. and anyone who thinks otherwise is simply wrong , clear enough for ya is it ?
tomwaterford wrote: » hmm....while not agreeing with jeering/abusing anyone....you do have a broad definition of irish war dead
end of the road wrote: » i hardly think the orange order will be let down here again thankfully after what happened last time
Pumpkinseeds wrote: » Sinn Fein would protest the opening of an envelope if they thought it would get them media attention. Bunch of shameless attention whores. The people who voted for them only have themselves to blame. They should have been left in the gutter, where they belong.
Nodin wrote: » It wasn't Sinn Fein.
Jesus. wrote: » Great dodge and way to show yourself up as a hypocrite! Typical narrow-minded armchair Provey
keeponhurling wrote: » Yes. Anyone who doesn't want another orange match in Dublin = typical narrow minded armchair provey
Madam wrote: » For the life of me I don't understand why we need to commemorate a war that happened 100 years ago...
P_1 wrote: » Irish republicans always seemed to have found grasping the precise definition of the word 'republic' a tricky one to master. Lads you don't represent me, you don't represent an awful lot of the people living here, kindly fcuk off.
any1butdublin3 wrote: » I am a republican and I have 4 ancestors who died in the war, they came from a nationalist family and some of the brothers were even in the IRA. In modern Ireland all the British Army WW1 celebrations comes hand in hand with being Anglo-Irish, many of the men who died weren't Anglo-Irish or unionist. I don't agree with the protestors but republicans have a right to be against it.
Young Blood wrote: » Can you believe Theresa Valliers was at this? The same woman who earlier this year denied an inquest into the Ballymurphy Massacre. Shocking.
fleet_admiral wrote: » I tolerated the shinners before today, now I absolutely hate them
keeponhurling wrote: » That's fine that you are now entirely comfortable with British army actions, both in Ireland and overseas. Bloody Sunday, Iraq , Afghanistan etc. Good for you. However some are still not entirely satisfied with their actions, and indeed many civilians are not around to have a view. "No excuse for that attitude now", Are you the thought police ? One of the most condescending posts I've seen for a while
P_1 wrote: » What is the point in defining your life based on the squabbles of past generations though?
any1butdublin3 wrote: » The Bloody Sunday generation are still alive and so are the soldiers who did it, providing he's talking about the 1972 bloody sunday
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Is it not a good thing that our British now want to actively commemorate our war dead?
P_1 wrote: » I'm sorry but I'm not going to hate somebody who happens to live in England because of what happened in Derry years before I was born.