hynesie08 wrote: » So are you charging for beer?
TireeTerror wrote: » You know I actually have setup a bar in my house, with draught and pool table and all that kind of thing. My friends got awfully excited about the idea of being able to smoke inside while playing pool. So far its alright seeings as its scorching hot these last few weeks, but I cant wait until the winter and they are standing in the rain greeting to get back in. My smug joy at this will be suitable compensation for about 3 years of my life being called "square" because I was the only one who didn't smoke despite their best efforts to try and humiliate me for not wanting to. Oh how the tables have turned looking down upon them from my ivory tower!
TireeTerror wrote: » I fear incriminating oneself by answering such questions.
Help!!!! wrote: » TireeTerror if you went to some ones house party & they were smoking indoors would you leave? & can you not encourage people to grass on each other If you Scots had of stuck together & not screwed each other over ( William Wallace/Robert the Bruce ) ye would have got the English out years ago
aaronjumper wrote: » So are people incapable of asking the staff to unlock the doors so they can leave? Instead of sticking around and being flabbergasted by all the horrific smoking and general lawbreaking. Best not mention the tv licence, cause all kinds of trouble in here. TireeTerror going by your posts you would make a great judge. "I am. . . THE LAW!"
TireeTerror wrote: » A TV licence, just another example of daylight robbery. Technology is here to encrypt the service, but residents are forced by threat of indirect imprisonment to pay up for a crap service which isnt even capable of operating within that budget and therefore licence payers must still endure commercials all the time. How people pay for it is beyond me. I even baulk at the €80 I pay per year to cardshare Sky tv!
Mr Williams wrote: » Barmen who allow smoking should be taken out and shot. I'd like to ask the OP where the fu*k was the old bill when all this was going on ?
Dr Turk Turkelton wrote: » Haha the law loving Scotsman gets caught breaking the law if not stereotypes by being too mean to buy a TV licence and subscription!
El Weirdo wrote: » You mean you pulled them out of your arse?
Little CuChulainn wrote: » The graph you linked shows a decrease.
porsche959 wrote: » It sounds as though you have strong anti-smoking opinions possibly due to losing someone close to you to lung cancer. If so, I'm sorry. Nevertheless, must ask, I take it you are consistent on this and would favour a complete ban on the internal combustion engine, given the studies strongly suggestive of a link between traffic fumes and the 10% of lung cancers patients who never smoked? I personally don't smoke and preferably don't even being like being around smokers, but consistency is important if one is occupying the moral highground, yes? Otherwise people might that one is being a mite hypocritical? And there are other cancers not linked to smoking, and other illness, that are just as dreadful as lung cancer in the closing stages.
Jumboman wrote: » So the gist of this thread is that it is OK to smoke in pubs and to hell with non smokers.
Pixelbastardo wrote: » Just lighting up now.
Mince Pie wrote: » Bit early for a lock in?
paddyland wrote: » You're jumping the gun a bit there. I have known people who died awful deaths of lung cancer. But that is not why I am against smoking. I couldn't care less if smokers want to kill themselves, let them. But smokers stink. Smokers are stinking people. And I would have liked to think that the human race was moving forward into a more enlightened period of it's evolution. Back in the nineteenth century, people had very little sanitation or hygiene, and everyone stank. Nowadays, with the advancement of the human species, and modern technology, we have hygiene, and people don't have to stink. But some backward people have not moved on. They are happy still to be stinking, and I believe their own impaired sense of smell inhibits their capacity to realise just how badly they stink. I don't even want to be next to a smoker who is not smoking, because they stink even when they don't smoke. So much for washing, or wearing aftershave, or perfume, or nice fragrant things. Maybe I have a heightened sense of smell. Or maybe I just haven't ravaged my sensory faculties with unnatural and unnecessary behaviour. Regarding internal combustion engines, no I wouldn't ban them, no more than I would ban smoking, except where it interferes with my personal space. I would drastically limit the number of internal combustion engines around me, but for a whole load of other reasons than the fumes they generate, which would be well down the list of reasons.
HelenV wrote: » It's people like you who absolutely sicken me. Do you think life is centered around your blasted nose? Your self-righteous attitude has a more pungent stench to it that any cigarette smoke ever had - but then again you'll be oblivious to that smell - others however won't!!