PhiloCypher wrote: » People will **** on Joe from a great height for that because he earned a fortune in wages off us and contributed sweet **** all , but I do agree with him on one point, the leading questions they use make me cringe to the point I can't watch official lfc interviews with new transfers anymore. That said, to use said interview technique as an excuse for being utterly and completely useless just doesn't wash with me at all.
Pilsbury Doughboy wrote: » Couldn't agree more! Really is bad the way they set the questions up so the new signing has to wax lyrical about the club.
Pilsbury Doughboy wrote: » Ah yeah, I'm not saying it would effect how the player would play, just cringey stuff! Maybe it is standard at all clubs but I can't imagine Stoke City or someone of that ilk, asking a player about dreaming of playing for them!
Agent Coulson wrote: » Jay Spearing was made club captain at Bolton delighted that moved has worked out for him.
Agent Coulson wrote: » Fcuk!!!! Edit:fake account. I fell for it.
Stargate wrote: » Agent Coulson return to base :P
Kirby wrote: » He can use the chappa'ai
mayordenis wrote: » We still have Leivapool too.
murpho999 wrote: » Surprised this hasn't been mentioned here today. But Bob Paisley was appointed manager 40 years ago today. First Liverpool manager I can remember and I think a seriously under rated one having one 20 trophies in 9 seasons including 3 European cups.
mosstin wrote: » I don't think Sir Bob is underrated at all.
murpho999 wrote: » Not by Liverpool fans but he is in the media in my opinion. I always found Man Utd get more positive media coverage, knighthoods etc.
mosstin wrote: » Not sure he was the type who'd have wanted a knighthood anyway. He's always mentioned in the pantheon of great British managers. He was better than almost all of them.
murpho999 wrote: » Well I do find the British Honours system stupid anyway but how Alex Ferguson gets one for winning 1 European cup (albeit in a treble season) and Bob Paisley gets nothing for winning 3 is beyond me.
Soups123 wrote: » It's more to do with the era, Knighting football folk back then was not common where as now a days it is. It's the only reason Fergie has one and Bob and the likes don 't
citytillidie wrote: » Man Utd became England's media darlings after a certain event happened, that's what my dad had always said and he is a Spurs fan
Knex. wrote: » The fact that he's not actually, "Sir Bob", would indicate that his a little bit.
murpho999 wrote: » Matt Busby also got his knghthood after winning European cup in 68.
5starpool wrote: » I don't understand why anyone refers to him as 'Sir Bob'. I know it's because a lot of people think he should have been knighted but he wasn't and use it anyhow, but I don't get it. Even if he was I wouldn't refer to him as 'Sir Bob' anyhow.
Hollister11 wrote: » Apparently Origi deal is done. Announcement on Monday.
mosstin wrote: » Well you'd be wide of the mark in this case. It was used ironically. Paisley's record in the game speaks for itself and a symbolic bauble from the queen wouldn't make a whit of difference to his legacy.
