Doctor DooM wrote: » A new person stands their best chance with a solid, simple, fundamentals based character like Ryu or Guile imo.
Doctor DooM wrote: » One of the main reasons, silly as it sounds, that I play SF compared to other games is because you can be good at it without a massive amount of combo training and because you don't end up in a 1 player game when you get hit. That's something I HATE as a new player in an FG. In SF4 you're always back in control within 5 seconds or so. In something like Marvel it can be 20+. Tekken isn't as bad but it still feels, when I play competitively, that because I don't know a particular string for some random character I have to sit there and get comboed after a high low mix up for a good while. It feels (and I accept that I might be completely wrong here as I'm not good at the game, but you're asking why I don't play) like it doesn't matter how good your FG fundamentals are at all at my level, because you're always going to get caught by these mix ups. To me, with my limited time, that means I will usually pick SF off the shelf first, but doesn't mean I don't accept that I could really enjoy Tekken if I put actual effort into it.
Ixayek_usurper wrote: » @Novi: What specifically are you having trouble with when fighting against Hwo? He certainly doesn't need a nerf man! He's ok in the game, but nowhere near OP.
NoviGlitzko wrote: » Haha. On a different note I remember the first time I went to XGC years ago I overheard a guy saying that Tekken is easy to play and SF takes years to be good at. He then proceeded to play SF and actually wasn't a Tekken player at all. I dunno. xD
NoviGlitzko wrote: » He's certainly better than ok. He probably has the best range in the game and very easy to spam with. It becomes quesswork to just prevent strings from hitting you online.
NoviGlitzko wrote: » Offline? I don't know anyone to play regularly offline so I can't really say.