DrPhilG wrote: » The WEC used to have higher weight classes though, they were just amalgamated into the UFC iirc. Simply weren't high profile or high enough quality to really class as a title unification. This was a good while before the WEC merged into the UFC.
Cage warriors calling their champs world champions is a farce,no one thinks they are actual world champions as the standard is so poor. The UFC belt is the world championship nothing else comes close,at best cage warriors is a european level belt at worst its a uk and Ireland title.
MrStuffins wrote: » By the time WEC merged with the UFC, the only overlap with divisions was LW. Pettis was due to fight the winner of Edgar v Maynard in a title unification fight but that fight ended a draw. So Pettis took a fight with Guida in the mean time and lost.
markcahill1985 wrote: » Anone know if the videos of Conors two losses are anywhere online?
MartyMcFly84 wrote: » I was at the event where he had his first loss, I think I was on the card also. It was a leg lock to an Eastern European chap in a community hall. It was quite a while ago before cameras were common on phones so not sure if it was recorded at all, and its always better to have videos of you winning on the youtubes
Yep, that's it but tbh, anyone who has trained for 4 years is a different fighter. It would be like video of Usain Bolt losing a school sports-day race.
dulux99 wrote: » Haven't read back through this thread, so this could already have been brought up,, but I wasn't massively impressed with Conor last week. At the fight live, I thought he was brilliant but when I watched it back the next day, i was shocked at how much he got hit. There was a head kick and a few right hands that landed flush, and he did well to take them, but a better fighter might have really had him in trouble. He looked noticably sucked in at the weigh ins aswell, especially in the face. He's only 26 aswell, so it's going to get much tougher for him. Unfortunately, I could probably forsee one of these weight cuts really affecting him, and it could be the reason for a poor performance in the future, and he'd probably move upto 155. But hopefully not. Poirier is an excellent test for him next. I think it's fair to say that Brimage, Holloway and Brandao were all very good match ups for Conor, but Poirier is very well rounded and can do it all.
Edsonbarboza wrote: » No pleasing some people,didnt see him in one bit of trouble at any stage of that fight pure domination Conor has a serious good chin your going to get hit in any ufc fight its a given cant expect him to perform mayweather type defence tatics,his 3 ufc fights have been flawless imo.
TrafficBug wrote: » Mcgreggor is great, but i will eat my hat if he ever beats Jose Aldo
dulux99 wrote: » When did I say he was in trouble? All I said was that he was very open to being hit, and a more refined, powerful striker could put him in trouble.
Edsonbarboza wrote: » Its a contact sport,if he didnt get hit you'd be complaining hes fighting nobodys who cant hit him,if he gets hit then people complain hes liable to take a shot,its bound to happen I didnt see him getting tagged with anything significant whatsoever so dont know how you arent impressed absolutely wrecked brandao.
CurryFlavoured wrote: » Poirier gets hit a lot but has a very strong chin, no way is Conor KOing him anywhere near as easily as he has other guys if that's the route the fight goes. As long as he can keep this on the feet for long periods and not get subbed I'd fancy Conor though. Poirier was caused trouble by Akira, Brandao and Holloway standing up previously, Conor is in a different league to them when standing up.