RasTa wrote: » What?! You can't be happy if those 3 turn out to be your strike force this season. Granted Suarez and Sturridge were the only 2 strikers last year however 4 is a must.
Iused2likebusts wrote: » In the modern game 4 strikers is no longer a must your remembering the days when teams played 2 up top. Of the top 7 only utd and city really had 4 strikers last year one of those won the league and the other finished 7th so I'd imagine 4 strikers is no longer a must.
RasTa wrote: » So the team with 4 strikers won the league? How about the past 10 years?
Fescue wrote: » Man City only had 3 strikers.
Soups123 wrote: » Negrado, Aguero, Dzecko & Jovetic But only sugar Daddy clubs have this many the way Pool play 3 is enough
Soups123 wrote: » City would consider him a striker although he can play AMC or in the wing. Normal self ran clubs cannot afford 4 established strikers
Augmerson wrote: » I reckon we will sign one more striker and then BR will start concentrating on the D-FENS.
Fescue wrote: » Three is ample if you intend to play one up front. Sturridge and Remy offer pace in behind which is essential in my opinion. Lambert offers something different.
Underpaid Mike wrote: » Liverpool scored 53 goals last season of which suarez didnt either score or assist. He was a huge player for us but Tottenham scored 55 goals all season and still came 6th in the league. We have plenty of goals throughout the side. The priority for us should be to tighten up our defence.
DDC1990 wrote: » Reus is nearly done and Vidal in the pipeline.
Sheepy99 wrote: » Copying the boys from the united thread now ay? Judging from the amount that thanked it there seems to be plenty in this thread crying out for an original joke
woodyg wrote: » I'm turning off notifications on this thread till September 1st. it's gone nuts in here lately!
5live wrote: » Looks like you're not alone.
Augmerson wrote: » You're Not Alone
Will I Amnt wrote: » Sir Gerry Remix FTW. One of my all time favourite tracks.http://youtu.be/HMCGwy88ZlU Was there that night too, in body but not in mind :pac:
Augmerson wrote: » Was the Temple the place in North Dublin? My sister's boyfriend at the time worked on the door and once we went to it. Fairly mind blowing experience at 17. I saw things I perhaps should not have seen at that age.
Will I Amnt wrote: » North side of the City. Fairly crazy place alright, I went there every Saturday night for about 2 years back in the hedonistic days.
hangballlouie wrote: » Started off in the mid 90s in the Asylum, then the Ormond for a couple of years, then the temple, which was the last great clubnight imo. Some nights back then. lots of water drank
Will I Amnt wrote: » I just missed out on The Ormond days, I tried one night, unsuccessfully, with the baby face on me Ended up sitting in the cousins car for the night waiting on them to come out. Still can't believe we got home in one piece, the absolute state of us all.
Maldjd23 wrote: » My first post in the Liverpool thread and it's about nothing to do with Liverpool! Used to always go there aswell, nearly every Friday and Saturday for a few years! Ah, the memories...kinda...:pac::pac::pac:
