Nodin wrote: » I expect them to fuck off back to their own side of the border. "Natural" my arse. The issue of land ownership is water tight and straightforward, and Israel is illegally occupying those areas. Any people have a right to defend themselves against colonisation.
Buzz Killington the third wrote: » Jesus, it's like trying to convince a North Korean that Kim Jong-un didn't win the Mr. Universe contest.
yortem wrote: » How rocket on cities, exploding cars, killing spree and bomb themselves in a restaurant is "defend themselves against colonisation"? Do you accept this? do you think its ok?
Nodin wrote: » The international community. Are you really this clueless or are you just being obtuse in hope of getting a reaction?
Archie D Bunker wrote: » Give me the names of 3 new Israeli settlements. That's all I'm asking for.
DamagedTrax wrote: » israel was treating palestinians like shyte long before hamas existed.
Buzz Killington the third wrote: » This is 4 years old, it's worse since then.
yortem wrote: » oh. so we get a country by the UN in a land that no one claimed to be his land yet, all other counties around attack us.. we "treating palestinians like shyte" and its a good reason to do all of this: (and its not even 1% of the things they do to us everyday) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_suicide_attacks
yortem wrote: » How rocket on cities, exploding cars, killing spree and bomb themselves in a restaurant is "defend themselves against colonisation"??
yortem wrote: » Do you accept this? do you think its ok?
DamagedTrax wrote: » It wasnt given to you by the UN, it was thru bribery and armed aggression and the ethnic cleansing of at least three quarters of a million Palestinians that created the Jewish state on land that had been 95 percent non Jewish prior to Zionist immigration.
Archie D Bunker wrote: » Nodin, what are the '67 border lines everybody always has the hots for? Nothing but ceasefire lines. They are not recognized border lines. That's a fact. So basically I find it hard to understand how the "international community" can support borders that do not really exist. Now, that said - the international community does support border lines BASED ON the 1967 ceasefire lines, but the actual borders, which settlements stay and which get dismantled, the whole East Jerusalem issue, the refugees, etc - all of these will only be addressed during advanced peace negotiations. If we ever see such a day...
yortem wrote: » 4 years old but only in 2013 the Un recognized the west bank as part of the palestinian territories.
yortem wrote: » O.o ok. now i understand.
Nodin wrote: » Well if you've a better idea..... I don't condone the targeting of civillians. Settlers however are generally armed.
yortem wrote: » ok i need to go to a shelter now.
yortem wrote: » better idea? they can ask the UN for a country and make the UN force israel to back off.
yortem wrote: » by the way, why settlers are armed? because cases like this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itamar_attack
Buzz Killington the third wrote: » Cool, talk to you later. I'm off to move my wall a few foot into my neighbours garden.
yortem wrote: » lucky for me i live far away from gaza so i have a minute and half to find a shelter when the alarm goes on. people near gaza has less than 15 seconds.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Feck that, I am off to attack their property and then move the wall into their garden and then bill them for my time and materials of said wall
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Well the people in Gaza have fcuk all time before Israel blows them to smithereens
"I've checked the Holy Book Of Buzz and it says that it was always yours, so that's ok. Also your neighbours are suspiciously brown."
Buzz Killington the third wrote: » Lucky for you a Hamas missile always gets taken out by your defender forces so you're probably not actually in danger!
