Fescue wrote: » Liverpool and United the big draw for tv audiences in the UK.
NapoleonInRags wrote: » em no actually, on the basis of those figures we've less average viewers than Stoke!
garra wrote: » Fair enough, I don't know ur form and took the comment at face value, I've read similar remarks down the years and they always wreck my head. Stick a smiley in or something. You got a man sent off with that dive.
Fescue wrote: » I think you need to look at the totals. Plus the Stoke average is high due to playing Liverpool.
NapoleonInRags wrote: » Yeah, so I did look at the totals and we're behind Chelsea dude...:rolleyes:
MD1990 wrote: » I wonder what will be our team for the opening day against our feeder club Southampton? i thinking something like this _____________Mignolet________________ Johnson___Skrtel____Lovren___Flanagan _____________Gerrard______________ _______Henderson_____Coutinho_____ Sterling______Sturridge_______Lallana I would start Sakho but with him coming back late i think Skrtel will start.
kevohmsford wrote: » I would hope we play Enrique at left back and bring in a new right back. Johnson was all over the place last season.
GotTheTshirt wrote: » I just got a flashback of the layout of the pull-out fixture lists when I was a kid. Anyone under the age of 30 won't have a clue what I'm talking about.
Hollister11 wrote: » Were still linked with Isco and benzema with skysports reporting that Isco on loan is a likely deal
OwaynOTT wrote: » Poor Charlie Adams gets an awful rap. He wasn't all that bad. On par with the Enrique signing for me.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » That's a lie. He had some good games for us and added something to the mix. His dead ball delivery was of a very high quality, and he is the type of player to make plays. A couple of items I remember are a superb whipped delivery from the left touchline against City at home in the League Cup semi; and there were a few occasions where he had a go at players and would beat one or two creating an opening from nothing. The issue was consistency - he struggled to maintain a level of performance over a full 90 minutes, never mind a stretch of games. Charlie Adam and players like him are the reason Kevin Kilbane has 100 International caps. Adam is clearly talented, a natural footballer. He is also not as fit as he could be; and doesn't bring the same level of intensity to every game he plays in. If he was driven to be all that he could be and all players were the same then it would mean the Spearings and McShanes of this world would be forced to ply their trade at much lower levels. I don't rue his absence, but I'm not going to pretend Adam was awful for us. Downing and Joe Cole - that's what awful is.
i heart chewy louie wrote: » At some point of his Liverpool tenure, he was quite simply: fat. He had a gut. I'd have stopped his wages, it was a disgrace.
mosstin wrote: » Apparently he had a Molby clause inserted into his contract. Stopping his wages wasn't going to happen.
Underpaid Mike wrote: » Would the signing of Isco not hurt the progress of Sterling and Couthino and to a lesser extent Ibe ? All 3 could be wonderful players but will need increasing time on the pitch in the coming 18 months. Isco would be a guaranteed (well almost) starter at #10 most likely if he were to sign. Have seen very little of him in the last 12 months but he was a quality player at Malaga.
Vicxas wrote: » The signing doesn't make sense to me. Loan signings rarely do under Rodgers. I have to agree with your post that this would only hinder coutinho and ibes progress. 2 players I'm very excited about.
Cartman78 wrote: » Don't understand why a club of our stature are even considering loan signings None of the other Top 5/6 are doing it so why are we??
hefferboi wrote: » Best looking squad in the league.
x43r0 wrote: » When it's a player of Isco's quality I don't see the problem What's the point is measuring everything we do against other teams are doing? If it improves our squad then it's a good thing
