Treehorn2077 wrote: » Firstly thanks to those who replied to my questions, much appreciated. Out of curousity Arquinsiel, what did they say when you refused to sign up? You mentioned interviews you had coming up, did they see that as a proper reason not to stop your payments? I ask because if I get a job between now and when/if I start this scheme, I'm taking it.@Myshirt: I'm well aware I was picked at random and that "no one is out to get me", paranoia is not something I suffer from. My issue however is being forced into doing 20 hours a week of free labour, for little over 1 euro an hour, under threat of having my JA cut if I refuse. Don't get me wrong I'd take a decent paid job right now if it was offered, but realistically my chances of getting anything permanent from this scheme seem pretty slim. Quite simply, why would any employer hire me at minimum wage when he can dump me after my 12 months are up and replace me with another person fresh on the scheme? Business isn't my strong point, but I know all about saving money and cutting costs.@fiestywonder Your discription of people on the dole as those "who sit around all day watching TV" is both naive and offensive. I've faced that same judgemental and narrowminded point of view from people when I was first made unemployed. Things like "you must be so bored" or "how do you fill the time" really annoy me. Sure there are those who choose to sit on their arse all day, but I'M NOT ONE OF THEM! The fact is I've been filling my time as much as I can, I'm out of the house most of the day, rarely watch TV, and have been attending various courses since I started on the dole. It's how you choose to use your time on the dole that matters, I chose to use it wisely. Prehaps you wouldn't have lost your dignity if you didn't sit around all day watching tv and acutally did something with your time.@Pixie326 thanks for the input Pixie. Can I ask, what kind of placements did they offer you? It may have been that those you found doing the minimum and complaining, may have got a worse job than you. I'd imagine not all involved are going to be placed where they'ed like to be. It's been my experience lately that work experience counts for **** on your CV, as most of the time they never bother to read them. I have the skills and experience, but when an unpaid intern is filling that position for nothing, why would an employer pay to hire me? All the experience in the world can't match free labour. You sound quite fortunate in your placement, I hope I'll be as lucky.
Treehorn2077 wrote: » Wow, thats quite a statement to be told from day 1 you aren't going to be hired or kept on after your time is up. No wonder some people were miserable, I'd be pissed off too. This is exactly what I was saying about being exploited, after 1 year you get dumped for another. No chance of a job, no chance of promotion, or decent wage... will someone please tell me how someone is supposed to be thankful for that suitation? Can I ask what you got of it? Were you kept on? What course options were you told about, this is something I would be interested in? I'm aware its 19.5 hours a week, that's half a working week they expect you to do for free, hardly what I'd call fair pay. Not much of an incentive to go looking for part time work either if it has to be less than 19.5 hours, seeing as they will adjust your JA down. If I find a job while I'm on TUS they can shove their scheme up their arse, and I'll be more than happy to tell them that.
toadettee wrote: » But I found a job on job bridge I would prefer and there's no way on this planet the department of social protection is going to let me get off tus.
MouseTail wrote: » Are you sure about this? I would find that very strange.
toadettee wrote: » Damned if you do and damned if you don't seems to be the problem with these schemes. I have been on it 6 months and my supervisor is more than accommodating. But I found a job on job bridge I would prefer and there's no way on this planet the department of social protection is going to let me get off tus. So I have to see my year out in a job I'm gaining nothing from, to go back on the live register in January with a cut social welfare payment now I have drawn attention to myself. I had my reservations about these schemes from the start but of course was threatened with cutting off my dole payment if I ticked no. Before this I went back to college for 4 years rather than do nothing and worked part time the whole duration. I just wish there was someone I could speak to in the department who even cared. Again can't fault the tus supervisors in my experience they do a great job, their hands are tied.
myshirt wrote: » Treehorn2077, I don't see the issue? You are long term unemployed, the state have been paying you during that period, you haven't found a job unfortunately, and here is an opportunity for you. There is no scam. No one out to get you.
Treehorn2077 wrote: » Out of curousity Arquinsiel, what did they say when you refused to sign up? You mentioned interviews you had coming up, did they see that as a proper reason not to stop your payments? I ask because if I get a job between now and when/if I start this scheme, I'm taking it.
myshirt wrote: » You won't be working for €1 an hour. You will be working for €10.40 an hour (208/20 = €10.40).
[Deleted User] wrote: » Are you sure about that? If I was you, I'd go speak to social protection again.
Arquinsiel wrote: » Your maths is off.
myshirt wrote: » Is it?
Arquinsiel wrote: » Yup. You haven't accounted for the Jobseeker's Allowance you'd be entitled to working for any non-scheme 19.5 hours. It moves that number down significantly.
Arquinsiel wrote: » Okay, how about this: it moves the number down illegally.
Treehorn2077 wrote: » Careful there Myshirt, you're starting to sound an awful lot like someone who works for the social welfare :P It's fitting that Arquinsiel brings up the subject of legality. There is currently a case pending with the European courts, taken by a number of people in the UK who were forced onto a similar scheme over there. So far it seems that the courts have ruled in favour of the people who's benefits were cut and the UK Government was acting illegally, when it stopped their payments. As the schemes are very similar, I wonder is it only a matter of time before a similar case is filed here.
toadettee wrote: » I think the department making an administrative decision to cut my payment now when my payment was higher before I started on tus definitely crosses some lines.
toadettee wrote: » The way I feel today a case could be filed. I think the department making an administrative decision to cut my payment now when my payment was higher before I started on tus definitely crosses some lines.
dodzy wrote: » Change in circumstances ? Care to elaborate on the cut ?
[Deleted User] wrote: » It all depends on your circumstances. It's possible that with a qualified adult and a child that you go over the PRSI threshold. If you think not, discuss it with your Supervisor. They'd be well used to dealing with wage queries and would be best placed to guide you.