Ronan|Raven wrote: » Managed to get the auld rape buzzword in there too, good stuff keep going, you are getting better the longer you keep going.
steddyeddy wrote: » The thing that strikes me about the whole conflict is that half the world seems to accept that Israel, a modern country are justifying a lot of their actions by citing a 2000 plus year old book.
end of the road wrote: » truth hurts doesn't it
Ronan|Raven wrote: » That is the best you can come up with, seriously? Whilst I may have enjoyed watching you slobber across your keyboard for the best part of today I must get a few points across. I am a strong believer in the rights for a Palestinian state, I believe the settlements and encroaches that continue in the West Bank et al to be wrong. I have major issues with Israeli policy and their carry on over the years however I also have major issues with the bull**** of Hamas and their ideals of what is right. One can go on about how XYZ happened in the past but as the majority, whether rightly and a lot of the times wrongly realise the possibilities of changing the past are most definitely not easy if not impossible. Look at this small country. I get pissed off when I see incursions into Palestine and see the death of Civilians, I also get highly pissed off when I see Hamas et al lobbing rockets without a care in the world into Israel and then act surprised when they get a hammering. In an ideal world diplomacy and a realisation by both sides than A) Israel is not going anywhere anytime soon no matter how much certain parts of the world may like it. And, the Palestinians need to be given a right to a state with the security of not worrying about an Israeli bulldozer coming over the hills. I am sorry if this post goes against your impeccable views.
end of the road wrote: » Hamas while no angels were democratically elected by the people of gaza
Nodin wrote: » A large element of the pro-settler lobby and movement, as well as sections of Likud do. While pointing out that the shower next door are a bunch of religious nuts that justify anything with religion with a straight face.
Ronan|Raven wrote: » And? So what? The Israeli Government were democratically elected too?
dj jarvis wrote: » matters not its a un fair "fight" on a trapped population , **** how they got to this point or who stared what i dont condone hammas - but i tell you this much , if i was in their position , i would be doing the same Israel has the right to defense - no doubts on that one but when 1 life from their side is worth 100 on the other , then its not justifiable country's with a backbone should be telling the ambassador for Israel to take a hike , as country's go , they have a neck like a jockeys bollix its hard to feel sympathy for Israel
Ronan|Raven wrote: » So you do condone Hamas.
dj jarvis wrote: » i think i said i dont
Ronan|Raven wrote: » But if you are saying you would do as they are doing then does that not mean you agree with them?
woodoo wrote: » As far as i'm concerned any adult living in an illegal settlements is fair game.
wazky wrote: » Where are all those Israelis supposed to go though?
Rhys Essien wrote: » Obama gave a very good speech to Israeli students last year with his own views on the conflict. Worth a watch.(only 8 mins)
davmol wrote: » So,the isralies had some of their citizens murdered and as usual have to kill 10-20 palestinians for every 1 israelie they lost.Scores of innocents will be murdered including a few littel girls already killed and Garth brooks gets teh headline of each newspaper. what kind of world is this that a plonker who sings sh1t songs can get the headlines while innocent people are murdered by the Israeli war machine?!1:mad:
...__... wrote: » You should try reading up on republian history the narrow water ambush was from the republic also lots of times there was bombs planted along the rail line with the tracks used as a command wire down south. Many gun battles across the border with the ruc/army.
Conmaicne Mara wrote: » Post strangely devoid of mention of rocket fire from Gaza into Israel.
